CWR… Shite (29 Viewers)

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
So it is something he actually said then?
A perfectly reasonable comment but the point is that CWR have taken out of context.
 

Last edited:

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
I don't really see what the issue is here to be honest. It is true he hasn't been playing much, and it is true that he isn't happy about it.

I watched the interview and he does talk about the team as the priorty, which is great, and what you have to come expect from our players who seem to uphold good standards and be professional. I suppose they could have gone with a better headline to reflect that, but equally if he hadn't said anything here I wouldn't have even noticed. I feel as if this reaction is a little bit over the top from him, which has now made it about himself.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
He wasn’t trying to upset the apple cart.

It was a very measured interview by him.

CWR interviews are poor. I know Lorna Bailey is a fan, but her stint on the City games was poor. She was too close to her emotions and was negative even during games we won.
Sorry to say that having watched the interview back, Woolfy is being a bit precious here. His mentions about the season being difficult for him and not being the season he imagined are obviously some of the most noteworthy/unusual parts of what is otherwise a pretty bog standard interview. So you can understand why someone else at CWR picked it out, because that’s their job.

I can also understand Woolfenden being frustrated at that being the takeaway from the interview, but ultimately if he wants the focus to be on the team then he shouldn’t be volunteering stuff about himself - the players literally get trained on how to do this.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Agree with the misrepresentation bit about Woolfy, but there are a lot more amateurish local radio stations than CWR, when it comes to footie coverage. Some of the stuff from opposition stations on ifollow has been hilarious in the past (both quality and bias)
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Agree with the misrepresentation bit about Woolfy, but there are a lot more amateurish local radio stations than CWR, when it comes to footie coverage. Some of the stuff from opposition stations on ifollow has been hilarious in the past (both quality and bias)
As I said, if Woolfy is upset about overly negative and sensationalist coverage now, good luck to him next season!
 

tskezz

Well-Known Member
A lot of hate towards CWR here but it looks to be a post from BBC Sport at a national level, I'd guess the CWR team who have the relationships with the players and club have nothing to do with it.

Yours sincerely,
CWR employee.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
It's not really about the content. This is our local station who are funded from a national level and resorted to a cheap clickbait headline. They absolutely should be called out for it and it should have been by us rather than the player having to do it himself.

One major attribute of our sustained success has been the togetherness of the squad, all rowing in the same direction, whatever the contribution and we dont want anything to derail that. They knew what they were doing by choosing that soundbite. Lampard has other priorities, but I wouldn't be surprised if they've been told more formally by Doug.

Shit station anyway who work for paedos.
 

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member
CWR coverage is on it's arse - As I imagine most local radio coverage of every team in the country is due to the major cuts to BBC Local Radio services

Personally I think it is a massive shame that Clive's tenure couldn't culminate in this season
 

AOM

Well-Known Member
The focus on negativity drove me mad earlier this season as well when they'd be asking other players after the game what they thought of Haji Wright's goal drought. What are they expected to say?

Saying that, I think the questions Rob asked to Woolfenden in this instance were fairly reasonable, and it's just the socials have decided to run with a negative angle
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
When I stream games when I can't go, it seems to be pot luck whether you get Gurney/Oggy or the oppositions commentary.

I have to say, I always hope its Gurney/Oggy because as some have mentioned, there's comms from other clubs, whose coverage is dreadful. There have been some decent ones as well to be fair but on the whole, they seem to be more 'un-balanced' than Gurney and Oggy and some of them are simply OTT on their support for their own team (which I get).

Gurney and Oggy do seem calmer and more balanced.

Granted, I don't have to listen to either on local radio (Gurney, I guess more than Oggy) than you lot up there.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
The focus on negativity drove me mad earlier this season as well when they'd be asking other players after the game what they thought of Haji Wright's goal drought. What are they expected to say?
It’s not the local media’s responsibility to be happy clappy about the club all the time, especially when the fans themselves are asking ridiculously negative questions of the team.
 

AOM

Well-Known Member
It’s not the local media’s responsibility to be happy clappy about the club all the time, especially when the fans themselves are asking ridiculously negative questions of the team.

I agree that his drought is something worth discussing, but I don't see what is to be gained by bringing it up with the players post-match?
I appreciate CWR isn't there for the clubs benefit, but the doubling down on the same negative aspects in the phone ins/fancasts/etc week in, week out can be tiring
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
I agree that his drought is something worth discussing, but I don't see what is to be gained by bringing it up with the players post-match?
I appreciate CWR isn't there for the clubs benefit, but the doubling down on the same negative aspects in the phone ins/fancasts/etc week in, week out can be tiring
What would you ask the players after the game?
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
CWR are burning their bridges each season with King.

It started with how they handled the fans forum after the Robins sacking. Note Kimg tends to use the clubs own resources now for set piece interviews.

CWR need City and City need CWR …. Gurney isn’t essential to either.

I don’t mind Rob actually, he’s a fan with a mic. You won’t get insights but you do get raw emotion.
 

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member
CWR are burning their bridges each season with King.

It started with how they handled the fans forum after the Robins sacking. Note Kimg tends to use the clubs own resources now for set piece interviews.

CWR need City and City need CWR …. Gurney isn’t essential to either.

I don’t mind Rob actually, he’s a fan with a mic. You won’t get insights but you do get raw emotion.
The fans forum after Robins was sacked was embarrassing and turned into a farce, I am amazed Doug never walked out of it - There lies the drawback of having Rob and Lorna who are obviously fans on the mic as they let their emotions override their professionalism
 

AOM

Well-Known Member
What would you ask the players after the game?

About the game, how they think their season is going personally, what barriers they've had to overcome, etc.
It's why I think the Woolfenden question was fine in context, but I wouldn't ask other players what they think of Woolfenden not playing
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
I don't really see what the issue is here to be honest. It is true he hasn't been playing much, and it is true that he isn't happy about it.

I watched the interview and he does talk about the team as the priorty, which is great, and what you have to come expect from our players who seem to uphold good standards and be professional. I suppose they could have gone with a better headline to reflect that, but equally if he hadn't said anything here I wouldn't have even noticed. I feel as if this reaction is a little bit over the top from him, which has now made it about himself.
Think he’s probably just frustrated that he’s come in to the team, kept a clean sheet and won and the headline is about him not playing.

I suspect there’s a bit of a rift between the squad/club and CWR. Don’t think Frank likes them.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
When things like this happen you can see the appeal of social media and people having the avenue to get their message out directly rather than have it edited and misconstrued by someone else.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Doug is such a professional with the forum
He will always answer questions he fronts up any difficulties and is adamant that ccfc deserves to be at the very top of the game and is setting everything up for this to happen
Look at his recruitment of Frank and top level coo’s and ibbotsons pedigree
He’s done a bloomin good job
 

Dougin

Well-Known Member
CWR used to be class back in the day. They used to let the right charcters on the phone in.

They wont let them on now its gone all woke, like this forum.

Ones its woke there is no fun in anything.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
I thought CWR's handling of the Doug King appearance after Mark Robins got sacked was very poorly handled in truth.

I think CWR needs a shake up in truth.
 

CovValleyBoy

Well-Known Member
I can't listen to the match coverage on CWR anymore. It's dumbed down, lowest common denominator shite probably manufactured for the 15,000 happy clappers who supported Liverpool before 2023. Alos, Bailey and Gurney are irritating beyond belief. Who on earth thought it was a good idea to get rid of Clive and replace him with these 2 clowns?
Calm down Maff , I didn't go Northampton either or League 2 matches very often. Clearly most of us didn't. We still cared deeply.
Like many, I think we were waiting for a team & a club to support.
Now we have one.

PS can't stand Liverpool.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top