Do you want to discuss boring politics? (22 Viewers)

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I happen to agree with on the Starmer/Saville stuff. The point is more about ‘judgement’ or the people in Starmer’s government who have represented terrorists, like Lord Hermer. That’s also questionable judgement and these people are running the government.

Nonetheless, you’re dragging up a prank and presented it as if it was obvious that it referred to the Lost Prophets frontman. Most of public would see it for what it is: a prank that’s caught him out and made him look daft.

Barristers represent upholding the law, it's one of the functions of what is a word renowned legal system. I thought somebody who calls themself a traditional conservative would have the deepest respect for that.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Barristers represent upholding the law, it's one of the functions of what is a word renowned legal system. I thought somebody who calls themself a traditional conservative would have the deepest respect for that.
Yes but I don’t respect when these human rights lawyers go out of their way to defend Britain’s enemies then expect me to believe they’re willing to defend Britain’s national interests.

By all means, if you want to defend criminals and terrorists, it’s every persons right to do so. Are they fit for public service? No.
Lord Hermer defended suspected Iraqi bomber
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Yes but I don’t respect when these human rights lawyers go out of their way to defend Britain’s enemies then expect me to believe they’re willing to defend Britain’s national interests.

By all means, if you want to defend criminals and terrorists, it’s every persons right to do so. Are they fit for public service? No.
Lord Hermer defended suspected Iraqi bomber

You are a child.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
It could have been Innocent,he can say it was and he'd get away with it , but there's an angle that should be examined as there is a trend forming with the attitude to it In the USA,hot topic right now,Musk and the president trying to normalise the abuse of women and children.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
It could have been Innocent,he can say it was and he'd get away with it , but there's an angle that should be examined as there is a trend forming with the attitude to it In the USA,hot topic right now,Musk and the president trying to normalise the abuse of women and children.
He did one a while back that expressed support for the IRA.

I assume MMB will say nobody in Britain knows what that stands for or something.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
I happen to agree with on the Starmer/Saville stuff. The point is more about ‘judgement’ or the people in Starmer’s government who have represented terrorists, like Lord Hermer. That’s also questionable judgement and these people are running the government.

Nonetheless, you’re dragging up a prank and presented it as if it was obvious that it referred to the Lost Prophets frontman. Most of public would see it for what it is: a prank that’s caught him out and made him look daft.

Embarrassing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SBT

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
What has the attachment I posted got to do with this?
It shows Harriet Harman a Labour MP when this picture was taken, later Deputy Leader of the Labour party and now Baroness Harman actually advocating for the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) an organisation that wanted , a group that campaigned for the legalisation of sexual relations with children and sought to lower the age of consent to four, that was in the 1970's.

That is far more outrageous than the picture you posted.
1768597457302.png
More recent image of Harman
 
Last edited:

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
It shows Harriet Harman a Labour MP, later Deputy Leader of the Labour party and now Baroness Harman. at the time actually advocating for a paedophile organisation. That is far more outrageous than the picture you posted.
So its a "Yeah, but..." post?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top