shmmeee
Well-Known Member
He was front post. This guy started about ten yard behind him. He was Kitching’s man.
Match Thread Sunderland - Coventry City Match Thread - Tuesday 13th May (19 Viewers)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
He was front post. This guy started about ten yard behind him. He was Kitching’s man.
Watching the highlights back and there are multiple occasions when Kitching fails to deal with the threat, including their goal. I’m fine with keeping him, but I really think a better starting CB would do more for this team than any new LB, ST or even GK.
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
Ok but you never answered my question, who was Haji Wright supposed to be marking?
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
Ok then, basically he's not marking anybody just fresh air.
SkyBlueAussie
Well-Known Member
It's over, and we move on.
Only way, otherwise we dwell on something for years on end, like stupid Sunderland supporters.
And we ain't like that.
BTW, I was at that match in 77, it was roughly 12 minutes extra, and we did like any other team would do, especially Sunderland, and we played for time.
Hypocrites, the lot of them. Also, what a lot of people don't know, is that near the end of those 12 minutes or so, the scoreboard announced an error to the score, and we all thought it would say Sunderland had equalised, (it was announced as 1-0 to Everton originally), which would have meant we were down. Turned out they lost 2-0
Hutch got two, then we let in two soft goals. Nothing changes much I guess.
Only way, otherwise we dwell on something for years on end, like stupid Sunderland supporters.
And we ain't like that.
BTW, I was at that match in 77, it was roughly 12 minutes extra, and we did like any other team would do, especially Sunderland, and we played for time.
Hypocrites, the lot of them. Also, what a lot of people don't know, is that near the end of those 12 minutes or so, the scoreboard announced an error to the score, and we all thought it would say Sunderland had equalised, (it was announced as 1-0 to Everton originally), which would have meant we were down. Turned out they lost 2-0
Hutch got two, then we let in two soft goals. Nothing changes much I guess.
Last edited:
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Same as Sakamoto and several others. That’s how a partial zonal marking system works.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Someone should have cut it out and kitchen should have marked his man
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT
Well-Known Member
Obviously didn't work, oh for the days when Center Forwards like Dion Dublin and Mick Ferguson can defend against the opposition Center Halves.
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
In zonal you 'mark' a space or an area.
I don't like it but lots of teams do it.
I don't like the hybrid idea either
Simpson
Active Member
That wasn't the issue, it was the fact that it was orchestrated before the game kicked off.It's over, and we move on.
Only way, otherwise we dwell on something for years on end, like stupid Sunderland supporters.
And we ain't like that.
BTW, I was at that match in 77, it was roughly 12 minutes extra, and we did like any other team would do, especially Sunderland, and we played for time.
Hypocrites, the lot of them. Also, what a lot of people don't know, is that near the end of those 12 minutes or so, the scoreboard announced an error to the score, and we all thought it would say Sunderland had equalised, (it was announced as 1-0 to Everton originally), which would have meant we were down. Turned out they lost 2-0
Hutch got two, then we let in two soft goals. Nothing changes much I guess.
But, as you say, it's the present that counts.
SkyBlueAussie
Well-Known Member
The train with Bristol City supporters was late, hence the delay. There was no intention.
Le overpriced Fee
shepardo01
Well-Known Member
Sunderland paying him £67k p/w apparently.
DazzleTommyDazzle
Well-Known Member
Simpson
Active Member
Just my opinion, based on being around then, not worth going into it all tbh.