OffenhamSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
How about putting a headline like "Ecclestone named among Wisden cricketers of the year" under Women's Cricket, and have this article (unchanged) under Cricket?
How about putting a headline like "Ecclestone named among Wisden cricketers of the year" under Women's Cricket, and have this article (unchanged) under Cricket?
It is on my BBC app. First article in 'Cricket'.How about putting a headline like "Ecclestone named among Wisden cricketers of the year" under Women's Cricket, and have this article (unchanged) under Cricket?
Think its a reference to the fact that on the cricket home page the story is categorised as women's cricket.It is on my BBC app. First article in 'Cricket'.
Yeah, it should just be tagged "Cricket"! No England Women will be on the 2025 list given the absolute hiding they got in the "Ashes", so this won't be an issue next year!Think its a reference to the fact that on the cricket home page the story is categorised as women's cricket.
View attachment 42705
Think that's a quirk of the website. Those labels are essentially tags so this story is categorised under mens cricket, womens cricket and cricket.
View attachment 42706
But the website doesn't seem to really cope with that and only displays one category against the story on the cricket home page.
Sky sports football keep posting shit about it as well. Proper gimps.I use Livescore..... i see they've started showing the scores of that awful Baller League now.
wtf is the baller league?I use Livescore..... i see they've started showing the scores of that awful Baller League now.
Watched it and I still don't know!wtf is the baller league?
Football for people who struggle concentrate through a whole tik tok videoWatched it and I still don't know!
From what I can see, A glorified 6a-side with some you-tubers(?) apparently (?) commentating and managing teams.
Players are non league players, a few ex pro's with a sprinkling of FL appearances between them, and a fat Troy Deeney, who in his first game belly bounced an opposing player and got sent off.
It is shite!
Fully expecting Brad Collins to rock up next season..... As a back up!
Wow![]()
Aluko accuses Wright of blocking opportunities for female pundits
Aluko, 38, took aim at the Arsenal legend - who has been a major advocate of the women's game - pointedly saying he should be aware of how much space he takes up.www.dailymail.co.uk
What an absolutely nasty and difficult piece of work she is
WowI'm not sure she has any self awareness.
I don't think they really have much self awareness either then.The problem with Womens football is that it has franchised itself to the Premier League. Many of the teams do not play at the grounds they are badged to.
It has created an illusion that the top league has equal status to the mens
There was a complaint about the Final played on Derbys pitch with the players saying it was disrespectful as the players are elite athletes and although its OK for lower league mens football premier players should not play on it - the irony that many games are played at non league stadia seems lost on them
probably not as being transgender is still protected under the EA 2010,Wonder if they will apologise to girls like this? Girl with suspected autism banned for asking transgender opponent: ‘Are you a man?’
I did not appreciate that of the millions of amateur players registered with the FA, fewer than 30 of them are transgender women. Not that it affects the merits of the decision itself, but you wouldn’t have guessed that number from looking at the coverage of this story.FA bars transgender women from women's football - FA says transgender women cannot compete in women's football from 1 June
From the scale of the coverage, I would have thought we’d be talking about thousands if not tens of thousands, rather than dozens and hundreds.I disagree. Each one affects dozens of opponents and team mates. Many hundreds of women have been affected, some injured, some displaced and many self-excluding.
I okay co-ed football over here and on our 8 a side team we have two women on as a minim at all times. no problem as they are above average for our team! give as good as they get and go full steam into tackles you absolutely love to see itI have personally received a broken wrist from a ball hit very hard by a male player when I played mixed walking football for seniors. I have personally witnessed at least four broken bones sustained by women caused by male players. Now, clearly, these women should consider no longer playing mixed football and go to the women's category. They have a right to expect that they will encounter no males in the women's events.
I okay co-ed football over here and on our 8 a side team we have two women on as a minim at all times. no problem as they are above average for our team! give as good as they get and go full steam into tackles you absolutely love to see it
not disagreeing with your point though, just saying don’t think every time men play with women women get injured, by any means.
i absolutely support the push for equality in sport, and it's great to see women's football finally getting more attention. But don't think the answer has to be retrospective apologies, expecially when there are major gender equality issues today around pay, healthcare, and autonomy that should probably go above football apologies on the listThe scale of coverage is about righting a wrong, which should always be big and welcome news.
Of course, an interesting question is why it took so long and why we are seeing no apologies to women and girls who have been discriminated against all this time. Perhaps a few lawsuits will focus minds.
I don’t think the timing of the announcement is any great mystery. I also think apologies are unlikely given this appears to be mostly about the FA moving to comply with the law now they have (welcome) legal clarity on the issue, as opposed to some kind of moral stance.The scale of coverage is about righting a wrong, which should always be big and welcome news.
Of course, an interesting question is why it took so long and why we are seeing no apologies to women and girls who have been discriminated against all this time. Perhaps a few lawsuits will focus minds.
This is a poor excuse. I suspect the FA will use it anyway. The FA has ignored legal arguments which have told them they have been failing to use the existing law to protect the women's game for at least a decade.I don’t think the timing of the announcement is any great mystery. I also think apologies are unlikely given this appears to be mostly about the FA moving to comply with the law now they have (welcome) legal clarity on the issue, as opposed to some kind of moral stance.