Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (30 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Could also be that younger people don’t like the government or politicians in general, can only speak for me but when I was younger I would have had zero interest whatsoever an anything a politician said.

70% have taken a dose
 

COV

Well-Known Member
I’m hardly prickly - Hungary used the Sputnik vaccine as the EU procurement policy was so negligent they had no supply - they broke ranks and used an inferior vaccine

I’m sure as Ring of Steel you were very scathing we didn’t go the Eu procurement route didn’t you? I’ll try and find it

But who is talking about Hungary? You should look at the info on the link, Hungary are way down the list with Malta and Iceland top. I’m saying that when you have a population of under a million you’re very likely going to have a higher rate than a country with 60m- way harder to influence so many people. I don’t think the UK will be highest in Europe, although we may well be higher than the other ‘big’ nations. As for the rest of it no problem, I’ll be someone else tomorrow 👍
 
Last edited:

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I have the right to be protected against people who are willing to put me at risk as much as people have the choice to be vaccinated. If I go to the cinema I want people in there with me to have done as much to protect me as I have to protect them.
The people who are refusing the vaccine are selfish, is it unfair on them to exclude them or unfair on everyone else to be put at what is at the end of the day avoidable risk?
I think selfish is unfair. But more importantly you reduce the trust in the vaccine by coercing and manipulating people to take it that’s my point
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
There isn’t one. We have never forced MMR we have never forced flu vaccines. You encourage take up not force. Democratic societies don’t force or then victimise those concerned about it

The choice is to take the vaccine or not. The argument needs to be won on the grounds of being right not manipulation and coercion. I’ve changed my mind now having seen the vitriol. Science and evidence wins not threats. It’s not about slippery slope it’s just wrong to coerce people to take vaccines. I may change my mind again if someone can show me facts about the issues the minority are causing

But in the past it's been easier to encourage take up because it wasn't as easy for the nutcases opposing it to interact with and influence millions of people almost immediately via the internet and being given as much publicity as those qualified to talk about it. Take this woman ranting in London. Beforehand such a thing would have never got much further than those few nutters listening in that park, and where it did it would spread slowly and be manageable. Now everyone around the country knows about it in the space of a few hours and it can cause far more widespread damage much more quickly

Now you've got that problem you've got to stamp down to stop these unfounded rumours and conspiracies, but that's going to take time. We don't have that time to deal with a healthcare emergency so you're going to have to use as much carrot and stick as you can to get people vaccinated. I think forcing people can be counter-productive and, in this society, will see people push back against authority because they don't like being told what to do. It just adds to the conspiracy theories because if they're forcing you what is it they're not telling you.

But even if you use a soft approach like offering incentives, tax breaks or even cash to get people on board it won't stop those theories. Again if anything adds fuel to the fire. A harder approach, such as telling people refusal of the vaccine will lead to restrictions on your ability to work, travel, recreation or at an extreme level refusal of treatment for Covid complications should they arise, would be the same but are seen as authoritarian, callous and uncaring.
 
Last edited:

Sick Boy

Well-Known Member
They’re also making doctors and nurses who refuse vaccination to take unpaid leave here.
Anecdotally these are those who don’t believe the virus is real and the vaccine is related to a global conspiracy to control people.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
This happened today also.
Morons

Arrest the lot of them. Or section them

Had it with these pricks now. Freedom of speech is fine, when it spills over into this shite it’s no different from Abu Hamza spouting shot that makes people commit terrorism. Lock the fuckers up for inciting violence.

If you couldn’t be arsed to pay attention in school and can’t parse info on the internet that’s your look out. They’re not babies and we need to stop mollycoddling them.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I think selfish is unfair. But more importantly you reduce the trust in the vaccine by coercing and manipulating people to take it that’s my point
The opposite of that is you reduce the trust in the vaccine when we can’t reach a point of heard immunity because selfish adults are refusing it. They’re the ones holding us all to ransom. Like I said, I want to go to a cinema safe in the knowledge that everyone in there has done everything that they can to protect me as I have to protect them. It’s up to them. I shouldn’t be put of from going anywhere because heard immunity hasn’t been achieved thanks to a minority. Selfish is absolutely the right word if you ask me.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
They’re also making doctors and nurses who refuse vaccination to take unpaid leave here.
Anecdotally these are those who don’t believe the virus is real and the vaccine is related to a global conspiracy to control people.

That’s different. Doctors and nurses have had to take vaccines as a condition for their job - does it apply to the biggest spreader of interest though - the domestic carer?
 

Sick Boy

Well-Known Member
That’s different. Doctors and nurses have had to take vaccines as a condition for their job - does it apply to the biggest spreader of interest though - the domestic carer?
The culture around domestic care is quite different and most live with families or the individual permanently and the contract is managed by the family.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The culture around domestic care is quite different and most live with families or the individual permanently and the contract is managed by the family.

I’m sure there are plenty of domestic caters in Italy employed by private contractors.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I’m there are but the majority won’t be.

Which is the same as every country but again isn’t the point - your Sterling nationalism for your adopted homeland though is charming

Shame you didn’t some here from Italy - you’d be spreading your legs for Boris every 5 minutes on here
 

Sick Boy

Well-Known Member
Which is the same as every country but again isn’t the point - your Sterling nationalism for your adopted homeland though is charming

Shame you didn’t some here from Italy - you’d be spreading your legs for Boris every 5 minutes on here
What a bizarre post.
No one spreads their legs for Johnson as much as you.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
The much heralded Australia looks like it’s zero Covid policy was not a smart move


Why? Because there's been protests? Like there have been here, despite the fact we were never under anywhere near as heavy restrictions as they have been. Only they haven't suffered from Covid anywhere near as badly as we have.

You have this obsession with populism. Just because people believe or want something doesn't make it right. For centuries popular belief fought heliocentricty and people were killed for it. They were wrong and it put the progression of knowledge back centuries. We had a popular belief that witches were the cause of disease etc and popular opinion wanted them discovered and killed. It was complete bollocks.
 

COV

Well-Known Member
Which is the same as every country but again isn’t the point - your Sterling nationalism for your adopted homeland though is charming

Shame you didn’t some here from Italy - you’d be spreading your legs for Boris every 5 minutes on here

err.. have you checked your avatar?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Going forward, you'd assume it will increase as a %age however.

And FWIW, surely it's in government's interests to include it, as what it then does is make %age of infected people suffering seriously from Covid... lower? Going forward, if people get reinfected but do relatively OK, that's surely a very valuable thing to know, and also to see playing out?

The likelihood is though that a reinfection will be milder due to vaccine and / or prior infection.

I think the issue is that we're in the transition from epidemic to endemic and some of the previous reporting becomes a bit less relevant. We don't report all other endemic virus to the same extent.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
The choice is to take the vaccine or not. The argument needs to be won on the grounds of being right not manipulation and coercion. I’ve changed my mind now having seen the vitriol. Science and evidence wins not threats. It’s not about slippery slope it’s just wrong to coerce people to take vaccines. I may change my mind again if someone can show me facts about the issues the minority are causing

The government has a duty of care to people and is well within it's rights to say "Feel free to not have a vaccine but there will be things you will need to be vaccinated for".
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Why? Because there's been protests? Like there have been here, despite the fact we were never under anywhere near as heavy restrictions as they have been. Only they haven't suffered from Covid anywhere near as badly as we have.

You have this obsession with populism. Just because people believe or want something doesn't make it right. For centuries popular belief fought heliocentricty and people were killed for it. They were wrong and it put the progression of knowledge back centuries. We had a popular belief that witches were the cause of disease etc and popular opinion wanted them discovered and killed. It was complete bollocks.

I'd say that the zero covid policy attached to a frankly awful vaccine program has meant that the have a scarily low amout of immunity at the moment so outbreaks will spread like wildfire
 

COV

Well-Known Member
The government has a duty of care to people and is well within it's rights to say "Feel free to not have a vaccine but there will be things you will need to be vaccinated for".

I don’t see a problem with this, you wouldn’t leave car insurance or buying fags & booze under 18 to individual choice would you
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Don’t see the problem with workplaces making requirements TBH. I’ve had to remove piercings and cut/change my hair to keep different jobs. It was my choice whether I wanted the job more than I wanted my freedom of expression.
 

Hertsccfc

Well-Known Member
I don’t know why you get sensitive - I’m pointing out acts of this diet can’t be ignored. If 80 cities in the U.K. say had thousands protesting against the Johnson government and its handling of the pandemic you would just dismiss them as cranks?
So why didn't we listened to the substantial greater numbers who protested against Brexit?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
So why didn't we listened to the substantial greater numbers who protested against Brexit?

Well they weren’t the majority anyway just a bunch of cranks. Also they had a democratic vote and lost
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top