Do you want to discuss boring politics? (20 Viewers)

wingy

Well-Known Member
The flavour is abhorrent
Nah it's delicate .
I love it's mushiness when it's overcooked Lol
Food for old folks ,will take on flavours be that introduced or alongside other ingredients .
How about celeriac, fantastic to introduce it's subtle flavour on other ingredients.šŸ˜‹šŸ˜Š
Ā 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Nah it's delicate .
I love it's mushiness when it's overcooked Lol
Food for old folks ,will take on flavours be that introduced or alongside other ingredients .
How about celeriac, fantastic to introduce it's subtle flavour on other ingredients.šŸ˜‹šŸ˜Š

You can have it all Wingy!
Ā 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
My mate who works in Sweden and he's been on it for years. Says it makes a huge difference. Don't think its mandatory or anything like that, down to individual companies. But as it seems to lead to increased productivity, less sick days and increased employee retention why would companies resist it?

I've wondered if we could do a system whereby each position has two people, each doing 3.5 days (or 4+3) paid pro-rata so we have an economy that works all the time. The idea of a weekend is an antiquated one now. Also many sectors where you could get 3 people on 8hr shifts a day to enable round-the-clock working.

Of course there's a problem with filling positions - if they're jobs people don't want to do you do end up without enough people to implement it.
Ā 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Again, I am not saying Johnson is a fascist, but he does keep doing the sorts of things fascists like to do.

Also: The Eton educated former Mayor of London talking about metropolitan elites. šŸ™„šŸ™„šŸ™„

You missed out 'and Oxford' and member of the Bullingdon Club.
Ā 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I've wondered if we could do a system whereby each position has two people, each doing 3.5 days (or 4+3) paid pro-rata so we have an economy that works all the time. The idea of a weekend is an antiquated one now. Also many sectors where you could get 3 people on 8hr shifts a day to enable round-the-clock working.

Of course there's a problem with filling positions - if they're jobs people don't want to do you do end up without enough people to implement it.

There was talk of something similar during the high point of the pandemic with people dropping a day to create jobs and the government subsidising the lost day.
At work but I'll try and find the article later. Worked out well economically if I remember correctly.
Ā 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Don't agree with it, bu if they oppose it accussations of assisting corruption will inevitably be made. Rich coming from a government that's given billions on T&T/PPE to their mates but some people will just lap it up.
Oh yes I'm sure an accusation from the minister *checks notes * Robert Jenrick cannot be easily rebuffed. Why aren't whey going on the attack about it instead?
Ā 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Oh yes I'm sure an accusation from the minister *checks notes * Robert Jenrick cannot be easily rebuffed. Why aren't whey going on the attack about it instead?

But it'd be like the anti-semitism thing. Brought up every five minutes on the news but any mention of the Tories anti-Semitism an Islamophobia report was just brushed aside or had them being accused of deflecting from their own problems. Same would happen here, fully aided and abetted by the many rags that are owned by Tory donors.

Every time, even on the supposedly leftie BBC, it's maybe asked once every five interviews so as they can't be accused of ignoring it, it gets deflected away and not followed up on in further questioning.
Ā 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Don't agree with it, bu if they oppose it accussations of assisting corruption will inevitably be made.
The article says 'Anderson has consistently denied wrongdoing and has not been charged'. Is that not been charged as they can't find anything to charge him with or not been charged and the investigation is over as they are two very different things.

Either way I don't see much benefit in Starmer supporting the government taking over. Its only a few weeks since this:
not convinced this is going to go down well with Labour voters in Liverpool.
Ā 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
But it'd be like the anti-semitism thing. Brought up every five minutes on the news but any mention of the Tories anti-Semitism an Islamophobia report was just brushed aside or had them being accused of deflecting from their own problems. Same would happen here, fully aided and abetted by the many rags that are owned by Tory donors.

Every time, even on the supposedly leftie BBC, it's maybe asked once every five interviews so as they can't be accused of ignoring it, it gets deflected away and not followed up on in further questioning.

The evidence (some might say circumstantial) against Jenrick actually exists though. The evidence against Liverpool cllrs is supposition so far.

What is the Labour objective in supporting it? If it's just about avoiding being seen to be uncaring about corruption then it really is pathetic.
Ā 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
The evidence (some might say circumstantial) against Jenrick actually exists though. The evidence against Liverpool cllrs is supposition so far.

What is the Labour objective in supporting it? If it's just about avoiding being seen to be uncaring about corruption then it really is pathetic.

To be fair the report is pretty damning about the everyday running of Liverpool council and it is accepted by Liverpool council themselves.


Why would Westminster Labour oppose something that the local party have already accepted?
Ā 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
To be fair the report is pretty damning about the everyday running of Liverpool council and it is accepted by Liverpool council themselves.


Why would Westminster Labour oppose something that the local party have already accepted?
Replacing one corrupt organisation with another perhaps?
Ā 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
To be fair the report is pretty damning about the everyday running of Liverpool council and it is accepted by Liverpool council themselves.


Why would Westminster Labour oppose something that the local party have already accepted?

If I wanted a whiter than white minister in charge of a corrupt local council, I'd support the employ of Robert Jenrick, he of the government that is currently subject to multiple legal challenges over giving contracts to mates for non-existent PPE etc without comment.
Ā 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
As I said what do they gain for opposing in Westminster something that the local council have already accepted?
Ā 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Got some people in the City making complaints that they're having to work 95 hour weeks. Want to have that maximised to 80, which is still a ridiculous number but those in the industry are fighting it.

That's what happens when you get people utterly obsessed with money in charge. Couldn't give a fuck about the toll it takes on people mentally and physically - the Ā£Ā£Ā£ makes it all worthwhile.

Latest on this is that the Goldman Sach's boss thinks it's 'great' they've brought it up with management, but 'if we all go an extra mile' it makes a big difference to performance. Basically, shut the fuck up and get on with it. If anything it sounds like he's asking them to do even more.
Ā 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
As I said what do they gain for opposing in Westminster something that the local council have already accepted?

Not looking like they're accepting an alleged corrupt council in an area that traditionally votes Labour being taken over by an (alleged) corrupt government of a party that has traditionally done a lot of harm to the place.
Ā 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
One for the Starmer haters. Labourā€™s polling vs a year ago. Closed the gap by 15 points during a time the government are handing out free cash to stay at home. Could be worse.

What's more accurate historically, Britain Elects or YouGov? Because YouGov looks very different. This isn't an argument starter, I can't be arsed with that anymore. Just putting it out there for anyone interested.
c10cb1e997407dc4b10af1c50d2908dd.jpg


Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Ā 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
What's more accurate historically, Britain Elects or YouGov? Because YouGov looks very different. This isn't an argument starter, I can't be arsed with that anymore. Just putting it out there for anyone interested.
c10cb1e997407dc4b10af1c50d2908dd.jpg


Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
I think Britain Elects report all polls, they sometimes do an amalgamated tracker of all polls but not seen one in a while.
Ā 

Philosorapter

Well-Known Member
The report into the Liverpool City Council isn't the report most people are waiting to be published.

The Labour Party at the moment is like watching a slow-motion car crash.

However, I do like the idea of putting current and former MPs and councilors on tags to protect the public until they can prove they are not a danger to society. There seems to be a very high rate from this group going through the court system.
Ā 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
Labour really are a bunch of wet tosspots ...do they ever not abstain from a vote ever ? Its their favourite thing these days ...have no say on absolutely anything

Embarrassing
Ā 
Last edited:

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Labour really are a bunch of wet tosspots ...do they ever not abstain from a vote ever ? Its their favourite thing these days ...have no say on absolutely anything

Embarrassing
Apparently itā€™s forensic... what the electorate secretly want.
Ā 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Yea , we all love trying to guess what our opposition is really about

An abstention is generally ā€œIā€™m not supporting this but i donā€™t want campaign ads saying I voted against it for the next five years.ā€

Thereā€™s been a bunch of trollish bullshit legislation put through recently portrayed as something itā€™s not. Anti protest bill as ā€œtough on criminalsā€, etc. Itā€™s the same tactic Corbyn used: using the Commons as a backdrop for Twitter vids and Facebook ads.

The average non-political person wonā€™t hear about this unless itā€™s out in front of them on social media Iā€™d wager. Itā€™s similar to Bidens strategy of just ignoring the culture war bullshit and trusting the public to do the same. Time will tell how well it works when youā€™re not up against Trump.
Ā 

PVA

Well-Known Member
With Tory donors in now in charge of BBC and Ofcom, cancelling TV shows which mock the government, and now this shit with the Sun, we can look forward to never ending propaganda and constant stream of how brilliant the Fuhrer Dear Leader Prime Minister is.

Fuck this government.
Ā 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top