Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Got the pen and red spot on
Ref (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Sky Blue Pete
- Start date
Terry_dactyl
Well-Known Member
I really don’t think he did. The red I reckon was probably right but never a pen for me. Despite what all those pundits, including Robins say. I suspect Robins can afford to be magnanimous about it but had we lost he’d be livid.
Their player did not have the ball. It was a clearance by Thomas and not a slide tackle/challenge.
Their player did not have the ball. It was a clearance by Thomas and not a slide tackle/challenge.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Fair
skyblue1991
Well-Known Member
Both decisions are 50/50 and can understand both sides of the coin
For me though, not a pen and not a red but completely get why the ref and others think the opposite
Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
For me though, not a pen and not a red but completely get why the ref and others think the opposite
Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
Both wrong for me.
Manchester_sky_blue
Well-Known Member
Agree with this. I reckon he knew the pen was iffy too which may have influenced his decision form the red.
I've no idea what Tatsu's yellow was for though.
It was after the pen so I assume descent but that's odd given the language barrier.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Watch them again
pusbccfc
Well-Known Member
Disagree on both. Not a pen, not a red.
slowpoke
Well-Known Member
Definite pen, had that been in the Premiership var would have said red card
hill83
Well-Known Member
pusbccfc
Well-Known Member
The Leicester player handled it before Thomas made contact!
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
MR says definite penalty. Red aswell
hill83
Well-Known Member
Fair enough didn’t know that ha ha
Their pen was an odd one given he got the ball cleanly then they clashed I thought it shouldn't have been given but I obviously don't know the laws of the game as much as MR who says it was. I did think it shouldn't have been a red though as he's clearly got the ball. Their red was borderline I did think it was reckless and no chance of getting the ball but no studs showing although he was off the ground. Two very difficult calls you probably could argue either way.
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
I have.
Saw replays of both, their pen Thomas gets to first (but is hellish reckless). Their red card is a 50/50 as far as I can tell.
When I say replays these are something I saw on someone's phone in the row below so could well be wrong.
Skyblue_LDN
Well-Known Member
Think it was a harsh red, yellow would have been fine. Pen is a funny one, we would have been screaming for it even though he did get the ball, would be a foul anywhere else on the pitch I guess
The watchmaker
Well-Known Member
Both wrong for me. Thomas has cleared it. The Leicester man is late and has taken his studs out after the ball has gone. Free kick Coventry. 
The red - it's again very late and it's not a clever challenge but he has kept it low and I'm not sure anyone would have argued with a yellow. I don't think he sends him off if he hasn't given the pen.
The red - it's again very late and it's not a clever challenge but he has kept it low and I'm not sure anyone would have argued with a yellow. I don't think he sends him off if he hasn't given the pen.
no_loyalty
Well-Known Member
I agree.
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
Yea, that was bizarre
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
I think by the laws of the game both are right, but it brings up the debate about the rules running the game again.
Thought the ref had a bad game in general though. Big decisions yes right by the book but he went against the laws when not giving out some early yellows to a couple of the Leicester lads, clearly trying to let the game flow but undermines him as well.
Thought the ref had a bad game in general though. Big decisions yes right by the book but he went against the laws when not giving out some early yellows to a couple of the Leicester lads, clearly trying to let the game flow but undermines him as well.
The watchmaker
Well-Known Member
If you are giving it as a foul it has to be a red so... either way the ref got it wrong.Most of the game I was bemused to be fair.
Having that said, I saw a replay of their pen and I somehow thought it wasn't a foul and a red car for Thomas
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
Fair point.
stupot07
Well-Known Member
You can't give a handball for that, it was whacked at him from about 2 foot away.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
slowpoke
Well-Known Member
Absolute definite red, hope you ain’t a referee.
Nuskyblue
Well-Known Member
That's what I thought live, the replay tho, it looks as if Thomas is trying to snap the c**t in two (fair enough, Dewsbury-Hall is a rat).
hill83
Well-Known Member
Come on pal. I’m saying it was a definite red keep up
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
I hope he is and he’s got little gifs on cards that he shows players.
SeaSeeEffCee
Well-Known Member
I think it was a pen personally and I think English football as a whole needs to get away from the idea that a challenge can't possibly be a foul if the defender wins the ball. There is nothing at all about winning the ball in the laws of the game. It was reckless from Thomas and he could have done Dewsbury-Hall some fairly serious damage. That being said, the referee still had an appallig game. His defintion of a yellow card varied massively throughout and, first half especially, he seemed to want to give every decision he could to Leicester. Red card was a correct decision, poor challenge.
jordan210
Well-Known Member
Plus the foul on Sheaf to stop him shooting just after wasn't even a booking
