I think with the exception of one or two the main thing is the security of the club rather than losing face on a semi literate football forum
your beloved acl ... (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter rob9872
- Start date
I think with the exception of one or two the main thing is the security of the club rather than losing face on a semi literate football forum
Check:claping hands:
<br />
<br />
The club, meaning messers Robinson and McGinnity, trying to clear the mess that Brian Richardson left. Now the rental deal alone is somewhat crippling to any club and its owners who reside at the arena. The fact that the local labor councillor Robinson was also on the board when this deal went through doesn't sound like a slight conflict of interest?
All I'm saying is the council have and are crippling this club, with the pretense of getting rid of SISU, long n short they council chose SISU as the only people to deal with rejecting another party
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
I thought it was the co op bank that were calling their money in that had the say so as to who took over in 2007/08 ? The directors of the club of course could have rejected the deal as the club wasnt in administration at the time. The councils influence was some what further away and they didnt actually make the decision.
so the fact we ran for years on the basis of paying out more wages than we had income never came in to the equation then ........ its all the councils fault.
where in actual fact there are plenty of contributors to our plight including the council etc BUT .......
The biggest single reason for our predicament is the decisions made or not made by the people who ran the club as directors or owners over the last 20 years...... the accumulation of which is the single most significant reason why the club is "crippled" and could be on the brink of extinction
