Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Wycombe Ratings (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter SeaSeeEffCee
  • Start date Mar 20, 2021
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

SeaSeeEffCee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #1
Wilson 6
Dabo 6
Rose 6
Ostigard 7
Hyam 6
McCallum 4
Kelly 4
James 4
Hamer 5
O’Hare 4
Biamou 3

DaCosta 2
Pask 6
Sheaf 6
Walker 6
Godden 5

Robins 2
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #2
Biamou woeful has cost us plenty of points
Sam mac woeful, looks half arsed

Do you know what I cant be arsed

Just woeful
 
Reactions: ccfc92

Blind-Faith

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #3
Wilson 7
Dabo 6
Rose 7
Ostigard 8
Hyam 7
McCallum 4
Kelly 5
James 5
Hamer 5
O’Hare 5
Biamou 2
 

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #4
Evo1883 said:
Biamou woeful has cost us plenty of points
Sam mac woeful, looks half arsed

Do you know what I cant be arsed

Just woeful
Click to expand...
He’s been woeful for weeks but mate ask yourself who picked him ?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #5
cc84cov said:
He’s been woeful for weeks but mate ask yourself who picked him ?
Click to expand...
I'm not on the robins out train mate... You'd be shouting into an empty room here
 
Reactions: letsallsingtogether

edgy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #6
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3

Subs
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3
<insert name> 3

Manager
<insert name> 3
 

lifeskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #7
Apart from ostigard the rest were poor.
Really felt Robins would shake it up at h/t...bitterly disappointed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: KersleyDigs

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #8
The telegraph have given biamou a 6

Just no fucking helping some honestly
 
Reactions: Cov kid 55, Marty and GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #9
Wilson 5, one save to make and spilt it, nowhere on crosses into his 6 yard box
Rose 6
Ostigard 6
Hyam 5 distribution woeful, so ponderous, too many touches
Dabo 7 was looking good before he went off
Mccallum 6
James 5 not sure what he's offering
Kelly 5 was busy but him and James do the same thing
Hamer 6 showed a bit of urgency, miss was awful but he was the best of the central midfielders
O'Hare 6 poor game by his standards but we still have no ideas when he's not on the pitch
Biamou 4 just pathetic

Subs
Walker 5
Godden 5
Da Costa 4
Sheaf 6
 

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #10
Wilson 6
Dabo 6
Rose 6
Ostigard 7
Hyam 6
McCallum 4
Kelly 5
James 5
Hamer 5
O’Hare 4
Biamou 4

DaCosta 4
Pask 4
Sheaf 5
Walker 5
Godden 5
 

BigadamL

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #11
Not one player gets more than 5 we were poor today and I’m normally a positive person. DaCosta was pointless Sam can’t be arsed and max was poor today
 
C

coop

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #12
MR 0
OSTIGARD 7
REST 0
MR has some serious team selections coming up Max Ohare not good enough we need two up top
 
D

Deleted member 2477

Guest
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #13
Why are the drama queens shouting for Max to never play again when it was Hamer who wasted the best chance of the whole game.
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSam01, StevieM and BigadamL

skyblues83

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #14
Wilson 4
Dabo 5
Ostigard 6
Rose 5
Hyam 4
McCallum 3 - keep him away from set pieces
James 4
Kelly 4
Hamer 4
O'Hare 4
Biamou 4
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #15
Wilson 6
Dabo 5
Rose 6
Ostigard 7
Hyam 6
McCallum 4
Kelly 5
James 5
Hamer 5
O’Hare 4
Biamou 4

DaCosta 4
Pask 4
Sheaf 4
Walker 4
Godden 4



Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: mark82
S

SAJ

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #16
Thought the only players that deserved in credit were Osti and Dabo. The rest were either poor or very poor.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #17
Hope some people have some perspective when they’ve stopped screaming

Osti hyam and rose played well
Dabo good

We missed 3 good chances and didn’t look bothered. Gonna leave my phone in another room

You doomsters and gloomsters are too much today

Good night

See you in 2 weeks
 
Reactions: steve cooper, AOM, Deleted member 2477 and 1 other person
D

Dimi_Konstantflapalot

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #18
We are unable to deal with any team that presses us. Players aren't good enough to play around a well organised high press

Our decision making becomes rushed and we play longer and usually into the opposition's hands more often than not

Been a common theme all season, we are far better when teams sit off us ( Brentford result is a case in point)
 
Reactions: stupot07

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #19
All 2, and that’s just for showing up
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #20
coop said:
MR 0
OSTIGARD 7
REST 0
MR has some serious team selections coming up Max Ohare not good enough we need two up top
Click to expand...
MR 0 sounds like a Bond villain.
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #21
Sky Blue Pete said:
Hope some people have some perspective when they’ve stopped screaming

Osti hyam and rose played well
Dabo good

We missed 3 good chances and didn’t look bothered. Gonna leave my phone in another room

You doomsters and gloomsters are too much today

Good night

See you in 2 weeks
Click to expand...

Nah, Hyam and Rose do not play well. By any stretch.
 

SeaSeeEffCee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #22
Sky Blue Pete said:
Hope some people have some perspective when they’ve stopped screaming

Osti hyam and rose played well
Dabo good

We missed 3 good chances and didn’t look bothered. Gonna leave my phone in another room

You doomsters and gloomsters are too much today

Good night

See you in 2 weeks
Click to expand...
Pete, we’ve just drawn 0-0 at home to bottom of the league and their keeper didn’t have to make a save in the second half. Missing good chances early on isn’t something to be applauded, we don’t get any extra points for nearly scoring.
 
G

Garryb80

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #23
Sky Blue Pete said:
Hope some people have some perspective when they’ve stopped screaming

Osti hyam and rose played well
Dabo good

We missed 3 good chances and didn’t look bothered. Gonna leave my phone in another room

You doomsters and gloomsters are too much today

Good night

See you in 2 weeks
Click to expand...
So can you honestly say that was acceptable? If the answer is yes then it's probably best you take a little break
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #24
Otis said:
MR 0 sounds like a Bond villain.
Click to expand...

He certainly did an Oddjob of the team and tactics today.
 
Reactions: AOM

AOM

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #25
Thought Sheaf looked okay when he came on. I'd imagine Kelly is out now, so would start him next game
 
Reactions: BigadamL

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #26
Wilson 4
Dabo 5
Ostigard 6
Rose 5
Hyam 4
McCallum 4
James 4
Kelly 4
Hamer 4
O'Hare 4
Biamou 3
 
S

steve101

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #27
Wilson 6 (one good save. Kicking poor)
Dabo 7 (looked a threat. Worrying injury. Looked like hamstring)
McCallum 5 (caught out defensively and poor crosses)
Rose 7 (good game. Important block for their first half chance)
Ostigard 8 (motm. strong performance again against physical battles)
Hyam 7 (best game for a while. Not really troubled)
Kelly 7 (defended well and his passing was better than recent. Injury didn't look good)
Hamer 7 (should have scored. Unlucky with late run and shot. Looked the one that might get something)
James 6 (the type of game I would have expected him to have controlled but didn't happen. Would have been a hero if he put late chance away)
O'Hare 7 (they had far more time when he went off. Missed his tempo. Made wrong choices again including his chance that he squared)
Biamou 5 (did great with his flick for O'Hare chance and won a number of free-kicks in good areas but finishing was so poor)

Dacosta 4 (absolutely no composure defending or attacking. Continually over commits himself)
Walker 5 (didn't contribute)
Pask 6
Godden 6 (did well to create late James chance)
Sheaf 6
 
Reactions: stupot07

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #28
Dimi_Konstantflapalot said:
We are unable to deal with any team that presses us. Players aren't good enough to play around a well organised high press

Our decision making becomes rushed and we play longer and usually into the opposition's hands more often than not

Been a common theme all season, we are far better when teams sit off us ( Brentford result is a case in point)
Click to expand...
Brentford was because we took the initiative
 

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #29
These people giving Godden and Walker 5's and Biamou 4s is beyond, absoloutly clueless.
 
Reactions: mark82, letsallsingtogether and stupot07

skyblueeyesrevisited

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #30
Lack of desire throughout
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #31
Wilson - 6

Dabo - 7
Rose - 6
Ostigard - 7
Hyam - 6
McCallum - 5

Kelly - 4
James - 4
Hamer - 6
O’Hare - 5

Biamou - 3

Dacosta - 6
Walker - 6
Pask - 6
Godden - 6
Sheaf - 7
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #32
SBAndy said:
Wilson - 6

Dabo - 7
Rose - 6
Ostigard - 7
Hyam - 6
McCallum - 5

Kelly - 4
James - 4
Hamer - 6
O’Hare - 5

Biamou - 3

Dacosta - 6
Walker - 6
Pask - 6
Godden - 6
Sheaf - 7
Click to expand...
Dacosta better than McCallum and most of the team? I thought he was really poor.

Sheaf did ok for the brief period he was on but wasn't joint motm.
 
Reactions: steve101

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #33
Deleted member 9744 said:
Dacosta better than McCallum and most of the team? I thought he was really poor.

Sheaf did ok for the brief period he was on but wasn't joint motm.
Click to expand...

To be fair, I will admit I got carried away when I got to the subs. That said, Dacosta pushed us up the pitch which was so important in my opinion, so I suppose I’m rating the game plan rather than him. Sheaf I thought was good when he’s on but maybe drop to a 6 then - was just getting that he was demonstrably better than a lot out there.
 

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #34
Wilson 6 not a lot to do but some poor kicking thrown in
Dabo 7 fear that’s him out for season
Rose 7 ok
Osti 7 ok
Hyam 7 ok
McCallum 6
Kelly 6
Hamer 6 got to score
James 6
Ohare 6
Biamou 4

Dacosta 4
Pask 5
Walker 6
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Mar 20, 2021
  • #35
SBAndy said:
To be fair, I will admit I got carried away when I got to the subs. That said, Dacosta pushed us up the pitch which was so important in my opinion, so I suppose I’m rating the game plan rather than him. Sheaf I thought was good when he’s on but maybe drop to a 6 then - was just getting that he was demonstrably better than a lot out there.
Click to expand...
Fair enough although Dacosta frightens me defensively.

Agree Sheaf did look much better than many starters.
 
Reactions: Cov kid 55
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?