Wilson starting on the opening day (2 Viewers)

Happy with Wilson for the start of the season?


  • Total voters
    205
  • Poll closed .

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Be in tune with the elite tactician we have as manager and know that we would sign a replacement!

What other changes are happening for the first game then? Let's us all know.
 

Gint11

Well-Known Member
5 keepers on the books. Surely we need to offload. If we can’t sell them then surely it’s a mutual termination no?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
It was pretty obvious that we weren't going to start the season with Wilson in goal.

But didn't know who or when the transfer would be completed. Which could have easily been after the first game.

I don't recall anybody suggesting Rushworth as a candidate?
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Hopefully now Wilson will start the season where he belongs on the bench and Collins starts it elsewhere.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
No Wilson is no2 and Collins is No3 it's just that the No1 Dovin is injured. You can't knee jerk and sign someone Everytime your first choice player in a team gets injured.

If and when Wilson or Collins gets moved on then that is different.
@Hobo you didnt want to sign anyone unless we got rid of Collins or Wilson.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Hopefully now Wilson will start the season where he belongs on the bench and Collins starts it elsewhere.

Was never a fan of Collins. But shifting him will be difficult I think. Can see him sat in the background just running his contract down.
 

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
Now the other option isn't Collins or a child I'd change my vote to 'no' but I found it a bit of a worry that in the signing article on the website, Lampard saying Rushworth will learn a lot by sitting on the bench and watching Brad do his stuff. Doesn't bode well
He meant sitting on a bench in the changing room watching DVDs of how not to do it.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
5 keepers on the books. Surely we need to offload. If we can’t sell them then surely it’s a mutual termination no?
Mutual termination isn't ideal as that means we're paying at least part of the contract up but its hard to see someone coming in and offering Collins the wages he's on at the moment so that seems the most likely outcome.

Thats assuming there's anyone out there lower down the leagues that wants him, if not he can just happily stay here collecting a wage.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Give it a rest. At the moment we have Dovin Injured. Wilson, Collins and Bell. If that doesn't change before the first game who are you picking?

Thats like saying we have 3 strikers

Roy O Donovan
John Gayle
Graham Withey
 

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
Got to love the certainty now it’s happened that we won’t be starting with Wilson. Negotiations with Rushworth don’t go well and we do start with Wilson.
 

Gint11

Well-Known Member
Mutual termination isn't ideal as that means we're paying at least part of the contract up but its hard to see someone coming in and offering Collins the wages he's on at the moment so that seems the most likely outcome.

Thats assuming there's anyone out there lower down the leagues that wants him, if not he can just happily stay here collecting a wage.
Yeah and that’s the thing. It appears as though clubs aren’t interested and any lower down the pyramid probably can’t afford the demands. It will have to be a mutual. Even a loan will likely mean we pay towards it.
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
Is it too late to change my mind? :ROFLMAO:

I don't need to change my mind, I voted No, Frank Lampard could see what we all could see and he's sorted it. Thank you Frank, thank you Doug. 😎
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top