Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Why did Waggot leave City ? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Ashdown
  • Start date Apr 11, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #36
Grendel said:
You can't actually set a budget on crowd numbers - it's conceivable the assumption on revenue at 11,000 assumed an incorrect percentage of full payers v concessions.
Click to expand...

So what would you set a budget on for CCFC?
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #37
Nick said:
This whole break even thing.


I'd suggest the financial side was Brookfield wasn't it?
Click to expand...

He played a part in it Nick but left at the start of the season. I suspect he left because he had very little to do and what was needed to be done could be done at a much lower pay grade.

The thing about budgets though is that they dont have to be set in stone. They can be flexed or adjusted weekly even daily if necessary. A lot of the extra costs were added after Brookfield left. Therefore the managers and more importantly the directors and owner should have been very aware and at an early time of any budget over run or even a need to change base assumptions.

But of course it is always easy to blame someone no longer there
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #38
Edit:

My shit joke....removed as it was embarrassingly shit....even for me....even for Otis...
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #39
oldskyblue58 said:
He played a part in it Nick but left at the start of the season. I suspect he left because he had very little to do and what was needed to be done could be done at a much lower pay grade.

The thing about budgets though is that they dont have to be set in stone. They can be flexed or adjusted weekly even daily if necessary. A lot of the extra costs were added after Brookfield left. Therefore the managers and more importantly the directors and owner should have been very aware and at an early time of any budget over run or even need to change base assumptions.
Click to expand...
So there wouldn't be anything strange about the break even figure changing?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #40
oldskyblue58 said:
So what would you set a budget on for CCFC?
Click to expand...

Does the average ticket price vary much from season to season?

I guess the thing that could have impacted this year was the introduction of the match packages, if they were more popular than expected the average ticket price would drop.
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #41
oldskyblue58 said:
He played a part in it Nick but left at the start of the season. I suspect he left because he had very little to do and what was needed to be done could be done at a much lower pay grade.

The thing about budgets though is that they dont have to be set in stone. They can be flexed or adjusted weekly even daily if necessary. A lot of the extra costs were added after Brookfield left. Therefore the managers and more importantly the directors and owner should have been very aware and at an early time of any budget over run or even a need to change base assumptions.

But of course it is always easy to blame someone no longer there
Click to expand...

In other words, all this needing 11k-14k figures are a load of BS?
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #42
Nick said:
So there wouldn't be anything strange about the break even figure changing?
Click to expand...

no not as such but the changes would be minor. To be out by a factor of 25% is not what I was saying is normal. It means they under budgeted the costs of the business despite all the staffing and operational cuts in cost...... it is not about under budgeting turnover

The budget sets the pot to be operated within and you spend accordingly. We actually exceeded budget in terms of income. The income as explained by SW in the SCG minutes was based on 6000 STH sales and 5000 walk up. I dont think we were too short on the STH and the walk up exceeded the budget and brings in more per person than STH. It is not a difficult calculation and there are no great assumptions to be made. Othere incomes are relatively fixed or as in terms of F&B known to be relatively small.

Our current crowd average is around 12800. Of that 6000 STH are set and known

To then turn round and say we were 3000 people short per match (or say at least £20k per match ) implies to me that they lost control of the costs. Now costs should in our position be monitored weekly by comparing to budget and therefore any expenditure above budget should be quickly identified and action taken to rectify.

That implies mis management at club level but to think that the owners do not keep a keen eye on things I think would be naiive. So that implies mis management higher up or an approval of overspend. However overspend has consequences with the FL and may well have influenced the sale of Maddison both restoring things to budget and in repaying short term finance from the owner

Just my take on things, it may of course be wrong
 
Last edited: Apr 12, 2016

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #43
Sky Blue Kid said:
In other words, all this needing 11k-14k figures are a load of BS?
Click to expand...

No they are assumptions behind which will be percentage assumptions on the type of purchasers we have.

People fixate on budgets too much as a guide anyway. It's clear we have overspent now in some areas and other clubs could have a larger budget but not spend it all.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #44
chiefdave said:
Does the average ticket price vary much from season to season?

I guess the thing that could have impacted this year was the introduction of the match packages, if they were more popular than expected the average ticket price would drop.
Click to expand...

Yes it would affect it but this is not a new business and these are not inexperienced financial people. There is plenty of historical data that would help model the budget and allow it to be flexed
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #45
oldskyblue58 said:
But of course it is always easy to blame someone no longer there
Click to expand...

It's not just CCFC of course, but I do wish those higher up would take responsibility. They choose who to employ, after all. They set the terms of employment, and they sign off if things are to be done or not.

It's easy to blame someone lower down the chain, when they're basically carrying out orders.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #46
Deleted member 5849 said:
It's not just CCFC of course, but I do wish those higher up would take responsibility. They choose who to employ, after all. They set the terms of employment, and they sign off if things are to be done or not.

It's easy to blame someone lower down the chain, when they're basically carrying out orders.
Click to expand...

Budget setting is a difficult and complex process as is forecasting.

It requires much talent, skill and experience and even then things can go rather awry.
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #47
Grendel said:
Budget setting is a difficult and complex process as is forecasting.

It requires much talent, skill and experience and even then things can go rather awry.
Click to expand...


hmmmm.....I don't think its rocket science to be fair.......if it was a brand new venture with a product straight off the CAD machine & an untested market it would be far more tricky.....but a big chunk of CCFCs costs & revenues are known & fixed....
 
S

SkyBlueZack

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #48
Reda's medical bill?
 

singers_pore

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #49
The club should have been able to accurately estimate the break even figure as it has historical data on the composition of discounted vs full price tickets and it should have budgeted for ticket giveaways and special offers. To be off by such a large margin is gross incompetence.

On the other hand SISU and CA would find it difficult to justify another budget cut next year if we had exceeded our budgeted break even figure. I think the new figure of 14,000 is bollocks and the true break even figure is still 11,000. Bear in mind that they came up with that 11,000 estimate at a time when it looked unlikely we could get average crowds over 11,000.

If we ever look like exceeding the new "break even" figure of 14,000 they will probably revert back to McGinnity's old breakeven estimate which was 21,000. Basically they have to come up with a breakeven that exceeds our crowds otherwise the fans will realize that the excuses for selling our best players are bullshit.
 
S

SkyBlueZack

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #50
Why did we sell Maddison then? I thought it was because he was the next big thing and was destined for the premiership? Or am I way off? And really it has paid for Joy's end of January holiday?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #51
oldskyblue58 said:
So what would you set a budget on for CCFC?
Click to expand...

Estimated facts.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #52
singers_pore said:
The club should have been able to accurately estimate the break even figure as it has historical data on the composition of discounted vs full price tickets and it should have budgeted for ticket giveaways and special offers. To be off by such a large margin is gross incompetence.

On the other hand SISU and CA would find it difficult to justify another budget cut next year if we had exceeded our budgeted break even figure. I think the new figure of 14,000 is bollocks and the true break even figure is still 11,000. Bear in mind that they came up with that 11,000 estimate at a time when it looked unlikely we could get average crowds over 11,000.

If we ever look like exceeding the new "break even" figure of 14,000 they will probably revert back to McGinnity's old breakeven estimate which was 21,000. Basically they have to come up with a breakeven that exceeds our crowds otherwise the fans will realize that the excuses for selling our best players are bullshit.
Click to expand...

Hmm, I've got no problem seeing it as anything other than a massive cockup tbh. 11,000 doesn#'t seem entirely stupid to put your budget at. It's attainable, and possible to go over, and if we were way down we had a bunch of loans we didn't need to extend.

My only thought is someone worked out the budget at 11,000 based on 'normal' ticket prices, forgetting we were reducing them for this season...
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #53
Of course there's always the possibilty that some of the interest on the "not real" debt has been called in and this has risen the break even a few 1000?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #54
skybluetony176 said:
Of course there's always the possibilty that some of the interest on the "not real" debt has been called in and this has risen the break even a few 1000?
Click to expand...


You are so slow..
Captain Dart said:
I thought it could have been like this...

Anderson : 11,500 crowd is break even
Seppala: Great, with my interest on ARVO loans?
Anderson: Err, no that doesn't include the interest
Seppala: I want my f***ing interest paid
Anderson: Err OK, that’s 14,000 then

* Conversation imagined & bares no relationship to actual events or persons.
Click to expand...
 

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #55
Captain Dart said:
Estimated facts.
Click to expand...

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
 
A

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #56
Deleted member 5849 said:
Hmm, I've got no problem seeing it as anything other than a massive cockup tbh. 11,000 doesn#'t seem entirely stupid to put your budget at. It's attainable, and possible to go over, and if we were way down we had a bunch of loans we didn't need to extend.

My only thought is someone worked out the budget at 11,000 based on 'normal' ticket prices, forgetting we were reducing them for this season...
Click to expand...

More like half the scrotes in Cov try and get away with pensioner, disabled/carer or kids tickets...................same just happened at Brandon at the Bees, they offered a student rate and suddenly half of their crowd are full time students. The clubs can't win sometimes !
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #57
Ashdown said:
More like half the scrotes in Cov try and get away with pensioner, disabled/carer or kids tickets...................same just happened at Brandon at the Bees, they offered a student rate and suddenly half of their crowd are full time students. The clubs can't win sometimes !
Click to expand...

Reminded me I must go there more this season. Given I can hear it from my house, I may as well watch it, too!
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #58
oucho said:
That much we know about CA already...but who else do we know who's tried to apply mathematics to business / football management?? Give you a clue, she's Euro-American too.
Click to expand...

Catherine Zeta-Jones?
 

Colin Steins Smile

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #59
singers_pore said:
The club should have been able to accurately estimate the break even figure as it has historical data on the composition of discounted vs full price tickets and it should have budgeted for ticket giveaways and special offers. To be off by such a large margin is gross incompetence.

On the other hand SISU and CA would find it difficult to justify another budget cut next year if we had exceeded our budgeted break even figure. I think the new figure of 14,000 is bollocks and the true break even figure is still 11,000. Bear in mind that they came up with that 11,000 estimate at a time when it looked unlikely we could get average crowds over 11,000.

If we ever look like exceeding the new "break even" figure of 14,000 they will probably revert back to McGinnity's old breakeven estimate which was 21,000. Basically they have to come up with a breakeven that exceeds our crowds otherwise the fans will realize that the excuses for selling our best players are bullshit.
Click to expand...

I would be very interested to see the management accounts for the club and see in the "fees" to SISU or "Consultants" have recently been adjusted upwards. That could account for a steep rise in the financial targets for the club.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #60
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor

Seems appropriate here.
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #61
Ashdown said:
More like half the scrotes in Cov try and get away with pensioner, disabled/carer or kids tickets...................same just happened at Brandon at the Bees, they offered a student rate and suddenly half of their crowd are full time students. The clubs can't win sometimes !
Click to expand...

It could be that they suddenly attracted a load of students with the introduction of the promotion, which had a knock on effect of putting off half the regulars....
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #62
Colin Steins Smile said:
I would be very interested to see the management accounts for the club and see in the "fees" to SISU or "Consultants" have recently been adjusted upwards. That could account for a steep rise in the financial targets for the club.
Click to expand...

There haven't been any such fees

Oh well
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #63
Grendel said:
There haven't been any such fees

Oh well
Click to expand...

Well I think in previous sets accounts there have been. I'm not going to look back and find it, but I recall that being reported at the time they were issued. Oh well!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #64
oucho said:
Well I think in previous sets accounts there have been. I'm not going to look back and find it, but I recall that being reported at the time they were issued. Oh well!
Click to expand...

So OSB is a liar then.

Spot on CJ
 

oucho

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 12, 2016
  • #65
Grendel said:
So OSB is a liar then.

Spot on CJ
Click to expand...

Oooh, venom and bile alert!!
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 20, 2016
  • #66
Once he'd resigned I guess he had no reason to in the City anymore?

...onwards & upwards PUSB
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 21, 2016
  • #67
Why did Waggot leave city

Was it because he didn't have a ticket.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 21, 2016
  • #68
Grendel said:
There haven't been any such fees

Oh well
Click to expand...

Do they all do for the love of City then?
 
C

Chipfat

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 21, 2016
  • #69
If anyone from the owners is getting paid I assume it will be related to getting the club's running costs down. Which if this is the case they will be happy with what has been done. For the fans it has sadly brought a decline in the standard of squads over the last 5 or so years. If the running costs are cut again, although good for the owners the fear should be at what level will be the 1St team squad be when the next accounts are submitted.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 21, 2016
  • #70
oldskyblue58 said:
So what would you set a budget on for CCFC?
Click to expand...

failure.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?