The players seem to have decided to stop claiming it anyway
Or we've hardly won since it was blocked ?!
I must have heard this conspiracy every year for the last 5 seasons.
Our down turn does coincide with SW's departure and CA's arrival. Northampton in the cup was our first game after the change IIRC. Truth is we'll never know why SW went could be the reason given at the time, could be he had to go to make way for CA, could be the reason in the OP, could be because he got the sums wrong. Who knows. Not us that's for sure.
The fact that Anderson moved in quite so swiftly looks like the change was planned tbh. If it was Waggot just jumping, we'd have had a longer spell before his replacement popped up.
Also if contracted, they couldn't just withdraw win bonuses.
tbh, sounds like horse shit to me.
Is that you Steve
A day after chief executive Steve Waggott's exit, the League One club have appointed Anderson as executive vice-chairman and managing director.
"Chris and I have had a number of very productive meetings already," said Sky Blues technical director Mark Venus.
Yes, I'm sure Tim Fisher has been feeling particularly evil and has been trying his hardest to stir up trouble.
Other than maybe a bit of wind aiding it's passage, & the splat as it hits the ground - what exactly does horse shit sound like???The fact that Anderson moved in quite so swiftly looks like the change was planned tbh. If it was Waggot just jumping, we'd have had a longer spell before his replacement popped up.
Also if contracted, they couldn't just withdraw win bonuses.
tbh, sounds like horse shit to me.
Arse aids apparently. Heard it in the wheatsheaf
Ouch. That's the worst type.
Who was responsible for setting a budget based on getting 11k at the Ricoh, which turned out to be 14 k?
Who was responsible for setting a budget based on getting 11k at the Ricoh, which turned out to be 14 k?
You can't actually set a budget on crowd numbers - it's conceivable the assumption on revenue at 11,000 assumed an incorrect percentage of full payers v concessions.
Waggott was a gob shite clever at saying what people like to hear, Anderson is simply dangerous.
You can't actually set a budget on crowd numbers - it's conceivable the assumption on revenue at 11,000 assumed an incorrect percentage of full payers v concessions.
Happened very quick I seem to remember. Wasn't SG expecting an interview with him in the afternoon but it was announced that he'd left instead. Surely SG's interview technique isn't that bad.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?