I'm not so sure.They are on a ridiculous run. Selective selection to make a point.
I'll humour you anyway. Spongbob SquarePants is to blame.
They are on a ridiculous run. Selective selection to make a point.
I'll humour you anyway. Spongbob SquarePants is to blame.
He was hanging around in our block today talking to a few people and taking pictures on his phone.Anderson for some reason he just annoys me.
I think it is 4 wins in 17 games since Anderson arrived.
The club is a mess on and off the field and even if we string a few results together it should not mask to state we are in, promotion brings a whole new batch of problems that we are not capable of solving. Too many players out of contract or on loan not to care enough about how our clubs ends the season, its just a shop window and experience for them.
So although the players take the blame for results the club has to take a fair share of placing the club in its current state, which allows any thought of progression to die with lack of long term ambition. We are still in 6th place and can still do well when compared to league finishes over the last 20 years or so. I just worry about where we are going as a club and the lack of desire we show towards progression.
I also didn't see remarks about Maddison performance when we won against Bury or bringing his transfer into postings, but i suppose a teenager has a bad game in a poor team performance will validate someones opinion that selling him is good business. We are a nowhere club going nowhere fast, thats is the saddest thing, not form, results or players performance.
Big factor I think.On the field look to the loss of pace and direction of our right side, yes Ryan Kent was frustrating and nieve at times but what an outlet he was which occupied opposing defences giving space for Armstrong and Murphy to do their bit. I could be a cynic and wonder if Anderson hasn't helped in recruiting a replacement but then we have Andy Rose who although not really a winger does give a bit of width, height and pace but never picked, that's down to the manager
We were saying the same thing yesterday, it's a bit of Peter ndlovu syndrome. He frustrated the hell out the fans but his pace and trickery caused havoc with defenses and created space for other players to capitaliseOn the field look to the loss of pace and direction of our right side, yes Ryan Kent was frustrating and nieve at times but what an outlet he was which occupied opposing defences giving space for Armstrong and Murphy to do their bit. I could be a cynic and wonder if Anderson hasn't helped in recruiting a replacement but then we have Andy Rose who although not really a winger does give a bit of width, height and pace but never picked, that's down to the manager
I think it is 4 wins in 17 games since Anderson arrived.
Why would it have anything to do with him?
Absolutely. What's even sadder is when the fans continually blame manager after manager after manager and player after player after player without pointing a finger at the owner and her succession of yes men CEOs.
There is no question that the spirit and fight of the team and its management has dissipated over the last two months. Yes, they are professional sportsmen and should always try their best but they are also human and they respond to the environment in which they work.
The reality of running any business is that when the people at the top of the organization are clueless, the organization as a whole becomes dysfunctional from top to bottom. CCFC will never have prolonged success on the field until it gets things right off the field.
For the naysayers (Nick et al.) please name a single organization that has clueless ownership and yet which operates as a successful enterprise.
They are on a ridiculous run. Selective selection to make a point.
I'll humour you anyway. Spongbob SquarePants is to blame.
Why would it have anything to do with him?
The amount of contradictions between mowbary and Anderson has been mind boggling. As if the two don't speak. That's got to be a cause of concern surely?
Yes but I wouldn't say it has caused our slump, much in the same way he wasn't responsible for winning 6.0.
If we gain promotion then does this mean the likes of Anderson and Fisher should be applauded?
Our two best 'spankings' though are Crewe 5-0 and Bury 6-0 and Anderson was here for both of those.So what is it then because you can't go from being top of league and spanking teams for fun to a side like yesterday who looked so lacklustre and no ideas.
You talking of promotion? Be lucky to make the playoffs at this rate.
Our two best 'spankings' though are Crewe 5-0 and Bury 6-0 and Anderson was here for both of those.
So what is it then because you can't go from being top of league and spanking teams for fun to a side like yesterday who looked so lacklustre and no ideas.
You talking of promotion? Be lucky to make the playoffs at this rate.
Yeah, but you are talking about spanking teams for fun. To my mind we have done that 4 times. Millwall 4-0, Gillingham 4-1 and then Crewe and Bury.And? What about the other 15 matches where we won only two of them. You can spank a team doesn't mean you get more points does it? Something needs to change otherwise will finish mid table
No idea, I'd start looking at the manager and team before blaming others.
Yeah, but you are talking about spanking teams for fun. To my mind we have done that 4 times. Millwall 4-0, Gillingham 4-1 and then Crewe and Bury.
That's 2 spankings without Anderson and 2 with.
Let's not paint a false picture here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?