We're not ready (1 Viewer)

Forums New posts
hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
Sky Blue Kid said:
You fail to believe what MR, McG, LC were QUOTED as saying. You call me an idiot....You're a twat who lives in a world where nobody else has a say in things. I personally think some of what you say makes sense, but you're a long way from being 100% right.
You need to realise...You are NOT God. and your 4-4-1-1 system, isn't the be all and end all.
Cue SBTaylor to have the last word....AGAIN!:facepalm:
Click to expand...

If he doesn't reply after being called a twat he's a better man than I am.
 
hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
RoboCCFC90 said:
Give it a few minutes..
Click to expand...

lHQo5.gif
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
1352457183365.gif
 
Mucca Mad Boys

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Sky Blue Kid said:
You fail to believe what MR, McG, LC were QUOTED as saying. You call me an idiot....You're a twat who lives in a world where nobody else has a say in things. I personally think some of what you say makes sense, but you're a long way from being 100% right.
You need to realise...You are NOT God. and your 4-4-1-1 system, isn't the be all and end all.
Cue SBTaylor to have the last word....AGAIN!:facepalm:
Click to expand...

I know they were quoted. We tried it v Shrewsbury, it failed. We don't have McG no more, so you can talk about playing 4-4-2 to with them upfront, but what's the point?

It's not my 4-4-1-1 system, Robins' takes credit for that, it is a fact we've won more games when we haven't played 4-4-2, home and away, yet you want to play 4-4-2. :facepalm:

I'll ignore the 'twat' comment, and answer that part of your post, I let you have your say, I just 'rebut' it, not that your posts make much sense anyway.

Sorry for the long wait guys, I didn't see the hype of my reply, I was just watching 'Good Morning' with that well hairy guy on.
 
Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
Why are you saying McG 'may as well have' resigned!? You're not making sense, he didn't resign, and is at Ipswich, long gone!

V Shrews we played 4-4-2 but McG dropped deep to be the ball, it failed badly. Accept it.

No offence, but you are an idiot, of course it fucking matters what formation we played I the 2 month good form streak we had! We played 5 midfielders. They didn't talk about twin strikers, they said upfront together, that could be in behind Clarke etc.

I don't know why you're talking shit about playing McG and Clarke upfront because McG isn't at the club anymore so the plan is foiled. We can only go on Shrewsbury which was a complete failure.
Click to expand...

We tried 4-4-2 and it clearly didn't work. MR has also come out and said that with the players we have got, one up front is the way to go.

DMC went where the money is. Simple as that.
 
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
and who can blame him? if cov were top 6 e may have stayed but right now another season in league 1 is lookling more likely than not(altho i still believ ein top 6 push)

442 can work,but i see no reason to try it rigt now when we are making so many chances
 
Mucca Mad Boys

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Otis said:
We tried 4-4-2 and it clearly didn't work. MR has also come out and said that with the players we have got, one up front is the way to go.

DMC went where the money is. Simple as that.
Click to expand...

I agree, we've lost more games at home playing 4-4-2 (lost 4 of 5) yet, some folk think that's the formation we should play at home?

Facts and MR are on my side (or I'm on MR's side) so the whole argument is quite pointless to be honest.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
I know they were quoted. We tried it v Shrewsbury, it failed. We don't have McG no more, so you can talk about playing 4-4-2 to with them upfront, but what's the point?

It's not my 4-4-1-1 system, Robins' takes credit for that, it is a fact we've won more games when we haven't played 4-4-2, home and away, yet you want to play 4-4-2. :facepalm:

I'll ignore the 'twat' comment, and answer that part of your post, I let you have your say, I just 'rebut' it, not that your posts make much sense anyway.

Sorry for the long wait guys, I didn't see the hype of my reply, I was just watching 'Good Morning' with that well hairy guy on.
Click to expand...

tumblr_mdnl8eRfb91rrxhj7.gif


Good Morning.. Let me down there mate..
 
Mucca Mad Boys

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
covcity4life said:
and who can blame him? if cov were top 6 e may have stayed but right now another season in league 1 is lookling more likely than not(altho i still believ ein top 6 push)

442 can work,but i see no reason to try it rigt now when we are making so many chances
Click to expand...

I think if you look at the players we've got, and try to suit it to a formation, I probably wouldn't have 4-4-2 in the top 3. We have the CMs to play 4-4-2 but not the wingers, our wingers like to cut in and aren't that good down the line, or taking a man on, they also aren't great at crossing either, pivotal to 4-4-2 wingers. We also don't have the strikers to play 4-4-2, we have Clarke and...???? I think Clarke can play the lone striker, I think he needs time to suit our system, that's all.

4-4-2 works for a couple of teams, it doesn't work for CCFC and thankfully, MR has acknowledged this.
 
covcity4life

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
yeah its not ideal but i feel it could work, baker and mcsheff have come on leaps and bounds under robins

also elliott and clarke could be lethal together imo, would have been highlighted sunday if not for that awful header from clarke lol

but im firmly in the 4-5-1 camp
 
Mucca Mad Boys

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
covcity4life said:
yeah its not ideal but i feel it could work, baker and mcsheff have come on leaps and bounds under robins

also elliott and clarke could be lethal together imo, would have been highlighted sunday if not for that awful header from clarke lol

but im firmly in the 4-5-1 camp
Click to expand...

Under MR, Baker + Sheff have had freedom, that 4-4-2 doesn't give you, not like they did under previous managers. I don't rate Elliott.

I'm glad you're in the 4-5-1 'camp'.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Otis said:
Good clip. Isn't this the bit where he sees Ann Widdecombe come out of the bathroom and her towel falls off?
Click to expand...

Yup thats the one, then she asks him if he wants to play naked table tennis..
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
SkyBlue_Taylor said:
I don't usually watch Good Morning. It had this guy on it, so it was a must-see. It also has Hollie Willoughby on it...
Click to expand...

Were they promoting Beauty and the Beast back in the cinema's again?
 
sky blue john

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
A couple of points firstly the system that a football team plays is dictated by the players you have !!!
We do not play 4-4-2 because we don't have the right balance with 4 players but we can make it work with 5.
Mcg get over it people he has gone support the players we have now. He did not owe us anything you have to remember Forest were paying him to play for us. If anything his loyalty should be with forest not us.
 
Mucca Mad Boys

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
sky blue john said:
A couple of points firstly the system that a football team plays is dictated by the players you have !!!
We do not play 4-4-2 because we don't have the right balance with 4 players but we can make it work with 5.
Mcg get over it people he has gone support the players we have now. He did not owe us anything you have to remember Forest were paying him to play for us. If anything his loyalty should be with forest not us.
Click to expand...

Well said.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Otis said:
And when he asks where the ball is she shoots it out of her vagina?
Click to expand...

After this he realises he has no racket and asks if it's in there too?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top