Grendel
Well-Known Member
Actually Tony I mentioned it once in a fit of pique some 3 years ago. It is you that seems to constantly refer to it. Why?
No. I'm sure you have a job. Just not (considering the vast amounts of spare time you seem to have on your hands) the important highly paid one you constantly claim to have on here. Second hand car salesman is my guess who once happened to sell an XJ40 Jag with a full service history. Nothing to be ashamed of.
Inferiority complex? Maybe?Actually Tony I mentioned it once in a fit of pique some 3 years ago. It is you that seems to constantly refer to it. Why?
Inferiority complex? Maybe?
Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
Have we not already seen the published accounts ?
They have not yet been seen on the Company House web site, that's all.
Accounts overdue
Next accounts made up to 30 June 2015
due by 31 March 2016
Last accounts made up to 30 June 2014
Annual return
Next annual return made up to 26 March 2017
due by 23 April 2017
Last annual return made up to 26 March 2016
The accounts have been published they just have not been placed on the Companies web site yet.
http://www.wasps.co.uk/your-club/wasps-financial-results
Is that the full accounts? I have looked at it, and the link and it just looks like a financial report. Happy to be told otherwise if wrong.
http://www.wasps.co.uk/docs/default...y/wasps-holding-limited-30062015.pdf?sfvrsn=2
For the uninitiated - Publishing a set of accounts on the website has no value to Companies House, they have to be filed. The official public documents are those at CH - end of!
Is that the full accounts? I have looked at it, and the link and it just looks like a financial report. Happy to be told otherwise if wrong.
http://www.wasps.co.uk/docs/default...y/wasps-holding-limited-30062015.pdf?sfvrsn=2
For the uninitiated - Publishing a set of accounts on the website has no value to Companies House, they have to be filed. The official public documents are those at CH - end of!
Calm down !!!!
It looks as if they are there. Panic over
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04187289/filing-history
Is that the full accounts? I have looked at it, and the link and it just looks like a financial report. Happy to be told otherwise if wrong.
http://www.wasps.co.uk/docs/default...y/wasps-holding-limited-30062015.pdf?sfvrsn=2
For the uninitiated - Publishing a set of accounts on the website has no value to Companies House, they have to be filed. The official public documents are those at CH - end of!
Why do you bother?
Why do you bother?
Exactly !!
Just put a call out for a Wasps flag for me to wave
Just put a call out for a Wasps flag for me to wave
Just more evidence - if we needed any - of how far up their arse Italia is.
Calm down !!!!
It looks as if they are there. Panic over
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04187289/filing-history
Calm down !!!!
It looks as if they are there. Panic over
Nope !!!! You are confusing the Annual Return for the Annual Accounts
Last two entries
Date Description View / Download 30 Mar 2016 Annual return made up to 26 March 2016 with full list of shareholders
Statement of capital on 2016-03-30
- GBP 775,550
View PDF (9 pages)
30 Mar 2016 Appointment of Mr John Charles Moore Parker as a secretary on 30 March 2016 View PDF (2 pages)
08 Jan 2016 Appointment of Mr Lawrence Bru
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/04187289/filing-history
Maybe intheknow or one of his cronies could come on and explain them in a bit more detail as they look to know a lot about them
It won't help you though.
You need someone to come on here and interpret them as the end of Wasps so the mutual fish slapping can continue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lefP0_ZM-Lw
Interpret what - the accounts that still haven't been submitted?
I wouldn't worry if I were you. I'm sure the delay is to see if some good news can be made on the EBIT side.
Then Simon can write a nice drooling article in the telegraph.
There are a lot of people that contributed to this mess.
However you and the team never mention the main culprits.
Quite telling really.
Wiped the egg of your face after telling us the accounts were delivered with such zeal?
You look a right idiot now don't you?
I can only tell you they are there from the submission I see.
You would still not believe it if they were rolled up and stuck where the sun don't shine.
It won't help you though.
You need someone to come on here and interpret them as the end of Wasps so the mutual fish slapping can continue.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lefP0_ZM-Lw
You would think he would have a good idea about them though wouldn't he once they are submitted? Being in the know and all
So you think they are there?
That's not accounts is it?
You would think he would have a good idea about them though wouldn't he once they are submitted? Being in the know and all
It's almost as if this boards position is to not upset them.
I answered that last time.
But again are you being like a kid repeating the same thing over and over until you think it makes sense to people. If it was "this boards position" not to upset them, then surely there wouldn't be a single anti sisu thread? Can you let me know the last time you made an anti sisu thread that was removed?
Talking absolute shit again.
No, I'll stick with my original statement that this board is administered not to upset them.
OK, so now you are throwing accusations about. Can you provide any proof that anything is administered not to upset them? Any examples of threads or posts deleted?
Oh hang on I'll go looking for deleted threads
No, I'm saying that your defensive attitude (and a few others) when Sisu are bought to task is why I am making the statement.
Responses like 'why are you so negative', 'Sisu are now putting the effort in', 'Get over it, it's in the past and the classic 'You once supported Sisu' cement the position.
It's almost as if you think they are doing okay and don't want to upset them.
I want them to be bought to task and boards like this should be the conduit to do it.
The board is currently doing the fans and the club a disservice by not being, or allowing people, to be more proactive in pointing their ineptitude.
We should be pushing for a plan to move the club forward not attacking Wasps who may just be our only ticket out of here.
Yes we can do both, but this board at the moment only does one.
Well surely you would know if you made a thread about SISU and I deleted it? There would be uproar, so it is safe to say that hasn't happened.
Do you really not see why you get the "Get over it, move on, its the past" comments?
Who has said people can't be pro active in pointing things out on here? When have any of yours or anybody elses posts or threads doing this being deleted or edited etc?
The site is doing a dis service? Well maybe you should be having a word with all of the members then as there is nothing from stopping them doing that on here is there? It isn't hard to create a thread, why haven't you?
Why are you trying to discredit the site and it's members by making stuff up? Are you going to show any proof or examples or just whinge that everybody isn't agreeing with you and doing things you want them to? Why don't you start a thread about a protest or something like that if that is what you want to see?
I will, but I expect the usual few will deflect it down at the expense of the majority.
I do know via PM's to me that several people have given up posting on this board because of specifically you and a few others.
Lets see...............
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?