Wake up supporters! (The sequel) (2 Viewers)

[Grendel]

ffs Grendel maybe they offered the deal to Arvo. Does it matter they are all part of the same scumbag company !!!!!

They didn't did they -- they offered it to Appleton. The statement from ACL pretty much says it as well. Oh you said liquidation would mean that we will be playing at the Ricoh and have new owners. Wrong again?

 

---

[SkyBlueBlood]

Today's news is both shocking and disappointing.

ACL have today shown their true colours; After reading that one of the conditions of CVA was that SISU retract their high-court action against the council, one cannot escape the impression that ACL really speaking are being controlled by the council who have their own agenda. From a business perspective, ACL have committed suicide today, and the only explanation is that another entity is pulling the strings.

The truths in the matter show how blinded some of us have been become as a result of our impatience with SISU over the last few years and our susceptibility to the propaganda vomited into the public domain by the council/CET etc. If this were any organisation other than SISU (or a SISU owned enterprise), people would very clearly see the wood for the trees.

ACL have claimed to want to put an end to this matter.

They claim to want to resolve all issues and return CCFC to Coventry.

They claim to have put a wonderful offer on the table.

Yet;

They are being bullish and threatening another football club with legal action for their involvement in helping us complete our fixtures.

They make CVA (which is in the best interests of the club) conditional on us accepting their offer and revoking high-court action.

They have refused CVA which is going to hugely affect us with our new campaign which at the very least has cost us points and crucial time to manoeuvre in the transfer market.


They are clearly trying to cause damage to the club, and you must consider if they are doing it off their own back, or on the instruction of a third party (CCC). Goodwill has to exist in business, and a no-strings CVA agreement would have been a positive step in putting all this manure behind us, and they would have recovered a considerable sum of the money owed. To insist that CCFC must retract high-court action is clearly not an ACL issue. Plus, what on earth do the council have to hide. They have a responsibility to the taxpayer to behave lawfully, and we all have a right to transparency when it comes to how the council spend your contributions, especially when the sum is so significant and the cause such a controversial one.

ACL are clearly encumbered by the decisions and weight of a third party, and as a result, we now start this upcoming campaign with a HUGE handicap.

Perhaps it's time to be resilient, get backsides on seats at Sixfields, and support the team. We should even champion the high-court action. We quite literally have nothing to lose now. Except the hunger and desire of our players.

How about delivering a big FU to ACL/CCC by refusing to be brainwashed any further!?

This is a joke isn't it?

 

[@richh87]

Today's news is both shocking and disappointing.

ACL have today shown their true colours; After reading that one of the conditions of CVA was that SISU retract their high-court action against the council, one cannot escape the impression that ACL really speaking are being controlled by the council who have their own agenda. From a business perspective, ACL have committed suicide today, and the only explanation is that another entity is pulling the strings.

The truths in the matter show how blinded some of us have been become as a result of our impatience with SISU over the last few years and our susceptibility to the propaganda vomited into the public domain by the council/CET etc. If this were any organisation other than SISU (or a SISU owned enterprise), people would very clearly see the wood for the trees.

ACL have claimed to want to put an end to this matter.

They claim to want to resolve all issues and return CCFC to Coventry.

They claim to have put a wonderful offer on the table.

Yet;

They are being bullish and threatening another football club with legal action for their involvement in helping us complete our fixtures.

They make CVA (which is in the best interests of the club) conditional on us accepting their offer and revoking high-court action.

They have refused CVA which is going to hugely affect us with our new campaign which at the very least has cost us points and crucial time to manoeuvre in the transfer market.


They are clearly trying to cause damage to the club, and you must consider if they are doing it off their own back, or on the instruction of a third party (CCC). Goodwill has to exist in business, and a no-strings CVA agreement would have been a positive step in putting all this manure behind us, and they would have recovered a considerable sum of the money owed. To insist that CCFC must retract high-court action is clearly not an ACL issue. Plus, what on earth do the council have to hide. They have a responsibility to the taxpayer to behave lawfully, and we all have a right to transparency when it comes to how the council spend your contributions, especially when the sum is so significant and the cause such a controversial one.

ACL are clearly encumbered by the decisions and weight of a third party, and as a result, we now start this upcoming campaign with a HUGE handicap.

Perhaps it's time to be resilient, get backsides on seats at Sixfields, and support the team. We should even champion the high-court action. We quite literally have nothing to lose now. Except the hunger and desire of our players.

How about delivering a big FU to ACL/CCC by refusing to be brainwashed any further!?

Absolute prick.

 

[DazzleTommyDazzle]

Today's news is both shocking and disappointing.

ACL have today shown their true colours; After reading that one of the conditions of CVA was that SISU retract their high-court action against the council, one cannot escape the impression that ACL really speaking are being controlled by the council who have their own agenda. From a business perspective, ACL have committed suicide today, and the only explanation is that another entity is pulling the strings.

The truths in the matter show how blinded some of us have been become as a result of our impatience with SISU over the last few years and our susceptibility to the propaganda vomited into the public domain by the council/CET etc. If this were any organisation other than SISU (or a SISU owned enterprise), people would very clearly see the wood for the trees.

ACL have claimed to want to put an end to this matter.

They claim to want to resolve all issues and return CCFC to Coventry.

They claim to have put a wonderful offer on the table.

Yet;

They are being bullish and threatening another football club with legal action for their involvement in helping us complete our fixtures.

They make CVA (which is in the best interests of the club) conditional on us accepting their offer and revoking high-court action.

They have refused CVA which is going to hugely affect us with our new campaign which at the very least has cost us points and crucial time to manoeuvre in the transfer market.


They are clearly trying to cause damage to the club, and you must consider if they are doing it off their own back, or on the instruction of a third party (CCC). Goodwill has to exist in business, and a no-strings CVA agreement would have been a positive step in putting all this manure behind us, and they would have recovered a considerable sum of the money owed. To insist that CCFC must retract high-court action is clearly not an ACL issue. Plus, what on earth do the council have to hide. They have a responsibility to the taxpayer to behave lawfully, and we all have a right to transparency when it comes to how the council spend your contributions, especially when the sum is so significant and the cause such a controversial one.

ACL are clearly encumbered by the decisions and weight of a third party, and as a result, we now start this upcoming campaign with a HUGE handicap.

Perhaps it's time to be resilient, get backsides on seats at Sixfields, and support the team. We should even champion the high-court action. We quite literally have nothing to lose now. Except the hunger and desire of our players.

How about delivering a big FU to ACL/CCC by refusing to be brainwashed any further!?

Did it hurt when they took your brain out?

 

[CCFC_GT]

I am one of those who appreciates that both SISU and CCC have contributed to destroying CCFC through each pursuing agendas that are completely without consideration to the interests of the football club. But just-here-4-coffee you are either a complete WUM or just intent on promoting a massively unbalanced one-sided version of events in which is anti CCC/ACL and in favour of SISU. For this reason your posts are without credibility and laughable.

 

[The Penguin]

Northampton was and is only a temporary measure. Ricoh negotiations will resume soon. If we show resilience as fans, and show we will support the club and their decisions by going there, then it gives them a much stronger position when it comes to fruitful negotiation.

I'm sorry, but I don't agree.

Going to Northampton is providing tacit approval that a football club can be relocated from its community for an indeterminate period of time (is it three years or five? Nobody can say because nobody knows, and those who claim to know are certainly not telling us anything) and not be returned (don't give me this in the Coventry area crap either, it's simple spin.)

ACL/CCC deserve the blowtorch on them, of that I have no doubt, but that does not mean we should support our owners (you know, the people who are the custodians of our football club) taking the club away from its heartland.

 

[kmj5000]

Ok answer this. Based I'm the statements today from fisher, ACL and the administrator in your view did ACL offer the £150,000 rent deal to sisu/otium or to the administrator only if otium were not involved?

FFS . You're as bad as Fisher - splitting hairs. It was obviously an olive branch offered to all parties concerned that was met with a disrespectful "no comment" by all accounts. Just about sums up Fisher's and SISU's attitude all along.

Deal must have been offered to JS personally at the meeting last week too because it was reported that she didn't want to know unless the CVA was signed.