fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
I think that's most likely, Sheff Utd got £13m for De Souza as well, so I am not sure they're under any particular financial pressure to sell.
I think that's most likely, Sheff Utd got £13m for De Souza as well, so I am not sure they're under any particular financial pressure to sell.I can’t see clubs paying what they paid for him - I suspect he will just stay where he is
I think he’s got a year left on his contract so after this season in the Championsip he’ll end up moving to PSV during the final year of his contract.I think that's most likely, Sheff Utd got £13m for De Souza as well, so I am not sure they're under any particular financial pressure to sell.
£55 million - not as much as we all hoped!!
Brighton are paid off I believeWhat's that, just over £3 million after Brighton get their share? Still, better than a kick in the nads.
They were for the original fee, but we’ve now profited further so will have to pay them their share of that.Brighton are paid off I believe
So a pretty insignificant sum in the end then.After a long and somewhat complicated analysis, Football365 have calculated the following -
"it can be estimated where Arsenal’s £54.8m rising to £63.4m will go:
Coventry are due between £2.96m and £3.69m
Brighton are due between £1.35m and £1.6m
IF Brommapojkarna are due between £1.1m and £1.27m"
It’s 64 pages worth - be grateful ffs !!!So a pretty insignificant sum in the end then.
Oh how quickly we forget.So a pretty insignificant sum in the end then.
If we’re genuinely going for promotion it’s an insignificant amount compared to what our rivals will be spending. The idea that we’ve been waiting for the deal to go through to kick start our business has always been unlikely.Oh how quickly we forget.
I remember when the club bought Hammer, think it was the first time the club had paid a transfer fee for a player in a few seasons ?Oh how quickly we forget.
No, we paid a fee for Godden and Chaplin.I remember when the club bought Hammer, think it was the first time the club had paid a transfer fee for a player in a few seasons ?
Did we pay a fee for JCH in League 2?No, we paid a fee for Godden and Chaplin.
I think we did in League One. I’m sure he was on loan in League 2.Did we pay a fee for JCH in League 2?
Yep agree…but just a couple of seasons back we’d have been made up with this amount.If we’re genuinely going for promotion it’s an insignificant amount compared to what our rivals will be spending. The idea that we’ve been waiting for the deal to go through to kick start our business has always been unlikely.
There was certainly a time under Sisu when we didn't not pay any transfer fees for players .Did we pay a fee for JCH in League 2?
Yeah and pre-SISU. The money we spent on Elliot Ward was the first time in years we’d spent any money.There was certainly a time under Sisu when we didn't not pay any transfer fees for players .
I inadvertently missed these further paragraphs from the Football365 piece (these various amounts to other clubs are apparently 'solidarity payments' triggered by international transfers, due to any club which contributed to the training and education of a player between the ages of 12 and 23) -After a long and somewhat complicated analysis, Football365 have calculated the following -
"it can be estimated where Arsenal’s £54.8m rising to £63.4m will go:
Coventry are due between £2.96m and £3.69m
Brighton are due between £1.35m and £1.6m
IF Brommapojkarna are due between £1.1m and £1.27m"
I inadvertently missed these further paragraphs from the Football365 piece (these various amounts to other clubs are apparently 'solidarity payments' triggered by international transfers, due to any club which contributed to the training and education of a player between the ages of 12 and 23) -
"IFK Aspudden-Tellus are due between £550k and £637k
FC St. Pauli are due between £276k and £318k
Once those debts are paid – likely to be in instalments depending on the payment structure Arsenal have negotiated – Sporting should rake in between £48.57m and £55.9m for Gyokeres."
I don't know, I'm just quoting from the concluding part of the piece.None of this takes into account the actual deal does it? It’s all based on calculators based on how long players were at clubs.
Thinking about it again, it must surely be based at least in part upon the actual deal. I mean if Vik went to the Arse for €2m those small clubs couldn't be paid the amounts listed above.None of this takes into account the actual deal does it? It’s all based on calculators based on how long players were at clubs.
Thinking about it again, it must surely be based at least in part upon the actual deal. I mean if Vik went to the Arse for €2m those small clubs couldn't be paid the amounts listed above.
Elliot Ward is forgotten about him , was he signed from West Ham ?Yeah and pre-SISU. The money we spent on Elliot Ward was the first time in years we’d spent any money.
Eze's release clause is apparently £68 million and he is the same age as VikSeems to be more talk of Arsenal negotiating with CP about Eze at present.
It's still a pretty large sum of cash for usSo a pretty insignificant sum in the end then.
We are still getting nearly a million more from a sell on clause than we paid for Dion Dublin. Different times but worth putting into perspectiveSo a pretty insignificant sum in the end then.
We are still getting nearly a million more from a sell on clause than we paid for Dion Dublin. Different times but worth putting into perspective
Im putting it into context of it being quoted as an 'insignificant' amount. It really isnt is it? How many players in our CURRENT squad cost more than the 3 million we will receive just from a sell on amountDion Dublin who we bought in 1994
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, U23 maybe?Elliot Ward is forgotten about him , was he signed from West Ham ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?