Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
Imagine 7-8 years ago saying that our manager would spend £7-8m on two players and we'd potentially have a transfer kitty of £20m?!
You'd have been sectioned!
I think a lot will hinge on if MVE goes for decent money. Otherwise I think you’re right.
Since Lampard has arrived he’s spent £7m+ on 2 players already.
If MVE goes and you get Vik and Hamer sell one that gets your a potential £20m transfer kitty. Some fringe players go like Lati, BTA, Simms etc that gets you another £5-7m maybe.
Yeah it was 4.25 euros my mistake.Well it was estimated to be 3.4 million. Maybe your figure with add ones. The truth is no one knows as most of Coventry's transfers are 'undisclosed'.
Fab's back to begging on behalf of Vik's agent.
2 million in salary is hardly going to sort out the transfer fee. I doubt Arsenal and Sporting are arguing over 2m.
It is just more journalistic daily bollocks chasing clickbait.
He's clearly posting on behalf his agent.2 million in salary is hardly going to sort out the transfer fee. I doubt Arsenal and Sporting are arguing over 2m.
It is just more journalistic daily bollocks chasing clickbait.
Fab was likely just a few days away from chaining himself to the Ryton gates "shouting set my baby free".This all feels very familiar.
He's clearly posting on behalf his agent.
yes, that is the pointIt doesn't mean it is accurate.
yes, that is the point
Can't see us letting him go for that low a figure. If finances allowed we would be much better off keeping him for another season. We would easily get the 6m in another year. And by then we could be in the Prem and have one less player to replace.I think MVE will go for circa £6m and Vik will go for £50m in the end.
most of ALL transfers are undisclosed
weird people thing that’s a unique thing to us..
Not in England, no. Most have a reported fee (like with KKH) but very rarely directly released by the clubs.A lot of clubs are more open about their transfer fees than we are don’t you feel?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not in England, no. Most have a reported fee (like with KKH) but very rarely directly released by the clubs.
More due to the level we were at I think. Once we hit the Championship again there were generally reported fees.We went through a period of time with SISU when we didn’t even get reported fee. It was just straight blank ‘undisclosed’ only
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
no, i do not feelA lot of clubs are more open about their transfer fees than we are don’t you feel?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But only fans take notice and get sucked in by such nonsense. The club's involved will be speaking to the agent and player directly. Not relying on media clickbait
We went through a period of time with SISU when we didn’t even get reported fee. It was just straight blank ‘undisclosed’ only
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A lot of clubs are more open about their transfer fees than we are don’t you feel?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Load of rubbish that surely.
It depends on what we believe.Load of rubbish that surely.
Arsenal want to buy him for £60 million but Sporting want the full 75. The two million is completely irrelevant in this case.
I believe very little of it and think most people probably think the same.It depends on what we believe.
£60m is nearly €70m. It's rumoured he is willing to take £2m a year less in wages for 5 years for it to happen. If this is true it adds over another €15m.
Then you have it where he is said to be refusing to play for Sporting again. If true that could help the deal go through.
Could all be shite from his agent though
Most signings are a gamble. A £70m or whatever it ends up as is a bigger gamble than we're used to.I believe very little of it and think most people probably think the same.
He's a cracking player and worth everything, think maybe Arsenal are slightly worried he could be another Nunez and struggle massively.
To be fair his opinion is shite on most thingsEvery time I read Rio Ferdinand's assessment that he's watched Viktor play three times and in his view he isn't good enough, the more it reminds me how shit Ferdinand's opinion is on this.
Especially when you consider that in 1 of his 3 viewings, Vik scored a hatrick at Man City.Every time I read Rio Ferdinand's assessment that he's watched Viktor play three times and in his view he isn't good enough, the more it reminds me how shit Ferdinand's opinion is on this.
Remember when Rio said give the Gunnar Thingy a contract now no matter whatEspecially when you consider that in 1 of his 3 viewings Vik scored a hatrick at Man City.
Fab's back to begging on behalf of Vik's agent.
Come on Sporting ramp up the fee (but still sell)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?