USSR invades Ukraine. (1 Viewer)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The world also came on the verge of nuclear war more than once and there were proxy wars all over the place.

It really didn't and there are proxy wars now - namely this one.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Well he hasn't flipped yet, still coming out with the pro Ukraine stuff.

Either, as others have said above, he's just parroting what the last person he spoke to said (ie Zelensky) and will pivot next time he speaks to Putin.

Or, Trump doesn't like backing losers - it's possible he's receiving intelligence that Russia is badly struggling (which it has been for a few months) and can't win the war.




 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Well he hasn't flipped yet, still coming out with the pro Ukraine stuff.

Either, as others have said above, he's just parroting what the last person he spoke to said (ie Zelensky) and will pivot next time he speaks to Putin.

Or, Trump doesn't like backing losers - it's possible he's receiving intelligence that Russia is badly struggling (which it has been for a few months) and can't win the war.





I think it's Trump talking indirectly to Putin saying you need to compromise over your unacceptable demands or this war goes on and on.

Best I can come up with, does that make sense because taking it literally does not.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Actions speak louder than words…
Tumbleweed GIF
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

PVA

Well-Known Member
Ohh haven’t heard the ‘infamous’ counteroffensive mentioned for a while.

Russia’s summer offensive has been an unmitigated disaster. Well, the whole bloody thing has of course.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Ohh haven’t heard the ‘infamous’ counteroffensive mentioned for a while.

Russia’s summer offensive has been an unmitigated disaster. Well, the whole bloody thing has of course.

I'm sure Mr Putin is having sleepless nights over it.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
About as well as Ukraines counter offensive.

I think a country with a population three times the side of the one it's invading being unable to achieve it's stated aims deserves to have the piss taken out of it. Not sure the smaller country that's holding the line for years on it's own deserves snarky comments about how well it is or isn't doing.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I think a country with a population three times the side of the one it's invading being unable to achieve it's stated aims deserves to have the piss taken out of it. Not sure the smaller country that's holding the line for years on it's own deserves snarky comments about how well it is or isn't doing.

Size really matters everyone
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Another 'infamous' offensive draws to a close.


Russia's latest big Ukraine offensive gains next to nothing, again​

Hundreds of thousands of Vladimir Putin's troops are losing their lives for barely any land​



In May, Russia launched an enormous offensive aimed at breaking Ukrainian lines. Its furious attacks in the following months set the entire front line ablaze

However, our calculations suggest it has seized just 0.4% of Ukrainian land

Russian forces have achieved no major objectives, with key cities such as Pokrovsk holding the invaders at bay…despite relentless attacks

The offensive has come at an enormous cost: our meta-estimate suggests over 100,000 Russian soldiers have died in the war this year.


100k dead for 0.4% of Ukraine this year. What an absurd waste of human life.
 
Last edited:

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Another 'infamous' offensive draws to a close.





100k dead for 0.4% of Ukraine this year. What an absurd waste of human life.
It is a war of attrition, it matters not that the Economist publishes this article what matters is that Ukraine is losing troops too and probably at no less rate that Russia. Ukraine will run out of manpower sooner than Russia, unfortunately it may take a few more years.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
What's the source for this?

I think though printed in an article in the economist there is a similar article in politico which states that the deaths are from Ukrainian sources
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
It is a war of attrition, it matters not that the Economist publishes this article what matters is that Ukraine is losing troops too and probably at no less rate that Russia. Ukraine will run out of manpower sooner than Russia, unfortunately it may take a few more years.

Indeed

 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Ukraine is losing troops too and probably at no less rate that Russia.

This is plainly not true.

Ukraine will run out of manpower sooner than Russia

And this is not guaranteed either - hence why Putin is now more willing to end the war than ever before. 100,000 dead for 0.4% of Ukraine is not remotely sustainable.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
This is plainly not true.



And this is not guaranteed either - hence why Putin is now more willing to end the war than ever before. 100,000 dead for 0.4% of Ukraine is not remotely sustainable.
I didn't realise you had contacts in military intelligence. 🤭
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I think though printed in an article in the economist there is a similar article in politico which states that the deaths are from Ukrainian sources
It will all be propaganda. It always is.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said the US government will impose a "substantial pickup" in sanctions against Russia, accusing President Vladimir Putin of not being honest and forthright with Donald Trump.
Putin not being honest and forthright? Find that hard to believe :ROFLMAO:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top