chiefdave
Well-Known Member
If you're going to use that logic you'd have to also say SISU have done no wrong!
......... Along with 4 judges and the majority of Coventry fans and rate payers.
......... Along with 4 judges and the majority of Coventry fans and rate payers.
If you're going to use that logic you'd have to also say SISU have done no wrong!
SISU haven't been accused of anything have they
Well not Infront of the judges
Well apart from devaluing ACL to buy it on the cheap by the judges. That isn't illegal though I don't think?
Didn't the judges only rule if it was state aid or not? Not if they have done things to damage CCFC?
Didn't the judges only rule if it was state aid or not? Not if they have done things to damage CCFC?
The damage was already done and CCC just protected themselves.
It's in the detail no matter how bitter a pill it is too swallow.
Exactly, so if italia is asserting that 'CCC have done nothing wrong' asserting on the basis they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity then you can also say the same of SISU as they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity either.
However they will be judged by most CCFC fans as using the club just to make a profit for themselves.
Do you actually type this drivel or does nick Eastwood do it himself?
How much profit have they made from the club?
How much profit have they made from the club?
Hows the humble pie going ?
None. Their plan went wrong.
None.
Do you think SISU should stop the legal BS now? Enough is enough wouldn't you agree? There is no legal case is there?
Lol no doubt it's in the detail
Sorry humble pie for what?
so they are being judged by not taking any profit from the club ?
Haven't you started eating it yet?
Mind you it must be one the biggest ever made !!
No, making profit by using the club.
So you're saying most fans judge SISU on the basis of something that never actually happened!
No, making profit by using the club.
That's a strong accusation. Do you have any evidence?
Didn't the judges only rule if it was state aid or not? Not if they have done things to damage CCFC?
Their a hedge fund, that's what successful ones do.
Yep, justice has been served.
#morals
Do you think SISU should stop the legal BS now? Enough is enough wouldn't you agree? There is no legal case is there?
Morals? Sisu have not break any laws so does that make them moral?
Good to see you back by the way. Now the seasons over I guess you feel on safe ground. Less football talk eh?
Any chance you could answer my questions? You're not dodging them are you?
Any chance you could answer my questions? You're not dodging them are you?
Do you have any evidence?
When you're correct 100% of the time you don't need to answer questions. You just present them and ignore the replies.
Given your refusal to ever answer any questions without asking one that's pretty funny and don't flatter yourself Tony - your not even at Simon Gilbert levels in terms of questions.
That's a no then. You just can't bring yourself to admit that there never was a case to answer to can you? Or admit that enough is enough and it's time to stop this BS and concentrate their efforts somewhere more productive, like CCFC?
Clearly bashing CCC is more important to you than CCFC. Pretty sad really. You're getting very lonely on that score, there's almost complete agreement on this site with regards carrying on with litigation. Maybe you just like to be different.
Exactly, so if italia is asserting that 'CCC have done nothing wrong' asserting on the basis they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity then you can also say the same of SISU as they haven't been found guilty of any illegal activity either.
Have a nice day today Tony?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?