Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Up to three million extra UK residents (3 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 5849
  • Start date Jul 2, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #36
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
So it was announced today on the BBC. They're throwing their hat in.
Click to expand...

I've since seen it on Sky. Probably a better alternative for a lot of people given it location though the same article said China was going to refuse to let people leave.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #37
clint van damme said:
I've since seen it on Sky. Probably a better alternative for a lot of people given it location though the same article said China was going to refuse to let people leave.
Click to expand...
It's going to get messy. You'd have thought that perhaps China might want to get shot of those who object to the new legislation and allow them to leave . Perhaps its a deliberate move to show that they are in control and any subsequent relaxation will be seen as a "goodwill" gesture on their part.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #38
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Who are frothy mouths ?
Click to expand...
Anyone who protests about any foreigners coming in.

We surely owe it to the people of Hong Kong to give them safe residence.
 
Reactions: derbyskyblue
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #39
Otis said:
Anyone who protests about any foreigners coming in.

We surely owe it to the people of Hong Kong to give them safe residence.
Click to expand...
I'd hope that the scale we're talking here makes such people stop and think the next time there's a mindless rant about immigration. Those numbers are trivial, for the everyday oppressed, compared to this. This highlights just how small they are in reality.
 
Last edited by a moderator: Jul 2, 2020
Reactions: Ring Of Steel and Otis

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #40
Deleted member 5849 said:
I'd hope that the scale we're talking here makes such people stop and think the next time there's a mindless rant about imnmigration. Those numbers are trivial, for the everyday oppressed, compared to this. This highlights just how small they are in reality.
Click to expand...
So you "hope" there will be big numbers coming over so it justifies something else . You hope that, for example, 3 million arrive from Hong Kong so that the usual figures of between 200 - 400,000 arriving most years from all over the world will look like peanuts and will no longer attract the kind of objections that it currently does.
It's very sad that you wish for huge numbers of people to feel so threatened for their liberty just to somehow satisfy your personal opinions on immigration policy.
I hope the Chinese renage on their policy and the people of Hong Kong feel that they can stay.
If not, we need to help as best we can. It's not about any personal political opinion. It's about doing the right thing.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #41
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
So you "hope" there will be big numbers coming over so it justifies something else . You hope that, for example, 3 million arrive from Hong Kong so that the usual figures of between 200 - 400,000 arriving most years from all over the world will look like peanuts and will no longer attract the kind of objections that it currently does.
It's very sad that you wish for huge numbers of people to feel so threatened for their liberty just to somehow satisfy your personal opinions on immigration policy.
I hope the Chinese renage on their policy and the people of Hong Kong feel that they can stay.
If not, we need to help as best we can. It's not about any personal political opinion. It's about doing the right thing.
Click to expand...

This is right. We also heard many, many times that 500 million people could be allowed into the UK because of freedom of movement. We all knew it was bollocks but it didn't stop the argument being used countless times. The real question is why has no government managed to get net immigration below 100,000 despite promising every year to do it.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #42
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
I take it this is a "bait the brexiteers" thread.
You need to grow up. What's happening in Hong Kong is pretty awful. Exceptional circumstances. We should help them and let those who want to come here do so.
Click to expand...

Not like say Syria, which lets be honest was what drove Brexit.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #43
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
So you "hope" there will be big numbers coming over so it justifies something else .
Click to expand...
Way to misread.
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #44
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
So you "hope" there will be big numbers coming over so it justifies something else . You hope that, for example, 3 million arrive from Hong Kong so that the usual figures of between 200 - 400,000 arriving most years from all over the world will look like peanuts and will no longer attract the kind of objections that it currently does.
It's very sad that you wish for huge numbers of people to feel so threatened for their liberty just to somehow satisfy your personal opinions on immigration policy.
I hope the Chinese renage on their policy and the people of Hong Kong feel that they can stay.
If not, we need to help as best we can. It's not about any personal political opinion. It's about doing the right thing.
Click to expand...

He is saying nothing of the sort. What he is saying is that this should put things in perspective, ie you get huge outcry & horror when massively smaller numbers of people come in, yet here we are talking about the same number of people as the entire West Midlands potentially coming in. The inference being that you should maybe think twice before launching into another anti-immigration monologue, because its not actually very many people at all you're talking about, no matter what Nigel Farage tells you.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #45
Deleted member 5849 said:
I'd hope that the scale we're talking here makes such people stop and think the next time there's a mindless rant about immigration. Those numbers are trivial, for the everyday oppressed, compared to this. This highlights just how small they are in reality.
Click to expand...
Nope . You want a big influx just so that you can make a political pont . Shame on you. You couldn't give a shit about the Hong Kong people at all.
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #46
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
Nope . You want a big influx just so that you can make a political pont . Shame on you. You couldn't give a shit about the Hong Kong people at all.
Click to expand...

I don't believe you are a teacher, but I do agree you belong in a school.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #47
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
I take it this is a "bait the brexiteers" thread.
You need to grow up. What's happening in Hong Kong is pretty awful. Exceptional circumstances. We should help them and let those who want to come here do so.
Click to expand...

So are places like Syria and Yemen. Far more serious and awful situations we've directly or indirectly helped to cause. Should we help them and let those that want to come here do so?

I think it's the correct move, even though it will anger China. But those that voted Tory for Brexit and stronger immigration laws are not going to be pleased that we've just offered to take in over a decades worth of immigrants (not just asylum seekers) in one go. Although I'm sure they'll somehow find a way to separate this from their usual opinions on asylum.

But to the HK residents - beware Brits bearing gifts. Don't forget Windrush - they were invited too.
 
Reactions: Ring Of Steel

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #48
Deleted member 5849 said:
Brexiteers must be apoplectic...
Click to expand...

I voted leave, I have no problem with taking in people from Hong Kong
 
Reactions: Alan Dugdales Moustache

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #49
Genuine question:

What benefit would this have to the UK, considering the unemployment rate will rise once furlough is ceased? Or is there an ulterior motive?

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #50
skyblue1991 said:
Genuine question:

What benefit would this have to the UK, considering the unemployment rate will rise once furlough is ceased? Or is there an ulterior motive?

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Ulterior motive apart from what? You surely don't think this is being done out of kindness or friendship
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #51
Ring Of Steel said:
I don't believe you are a teacher, but I do agree you belong in a school.
Click to expand...
Good. I'm glad you've got that off your chest.
 
Last edited: Jul 2, 2020

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #52
Ring Of Steel said:
Ulterior motive apart from what? You surely don't think this is being done out of kindness or friendship
Click to expand...
Oh no, here we go.......
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #53
skyblue1991 said:
Genuine question:

What benefit would this have to the UK, considering the unemployment rate will rise once furlough is ceased? Or is there an ulterior motive?

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Did see something about giving them a region and making it a Freeport.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #54
Evo1883 said:
I voted leave, I have no problem with taking in people from Hong Kong
Click to expand...
Exccellent. Hopefully not from Syria either. If so, we'll get on famously
 
Reactions: Otis
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #55
Ring Of Steel said:
Ulterior motive apart from what? You surely don't think this is being done out of kindness or friendship
Click to expand...
tbf, traditionally Johnson is very liberal in his attitude to immigration. This is far more the Johnson prior to his stance on Brexit, and his rhetoric there. It's interesting in its own way... although given he didn't realise that people with leave to remain in the UK didn't necessarily have access to benefits...
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #56
Deleted member 5849 said:
Exccellent. Hopefully not from Syria either. If so, we'll get on famously
Click to expand...
..and if he doesn't agree with you, then that's his problem not yours. After all, you're always right.
 
Reactions: Grendel

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #57
Deleted member 5849 said:
Exccellent. Hopefully not from Syria either. If so, we'll get on famously
Click to expand...

Britain since 2016 has taken in more refugees from outside the EU than any other EU state... I think we do our bit
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #58
Evo1883 said:
Britain since 2016 has taken in more refugees from outside the EU than any other EU state... I think we do our bit
Click to expand...
Just over 20k people offered protection by the UK in the last year. Nothing compared to this. No reason to complain about 20k
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #59
Deleted member 5849 said:
Just over 20k people offered protection by the UK in the last year. Nothing compared to this. No reason to complain about 20k
Click to expand...


I'm not complaining about anything, merely pointing out we do help refugees... Our offering help to Hong Kong is an entirely different situation
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #60
Evo1883 said:
I'm not complaining about anything, merely pointing out we do help refugees... Our offering help to Hong Kong is an entirely different situation
Click to expand...
Not really. It's only different in the same v way b somebody from Sudan is persecuted in a different way to somebody from Syria.

If you support us helping people in need from any country I have no issue whatsoever
 
Reactions: Evo1883

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #61
Deleted member 5849 said:
Not really. It's only different in the same v way b somebody from Sudan is persecuted in a different way to somebody from Syria.

If you support us helping people in need from any country I have no issue whatsoever
Click to expand...


I generally don't mind us helping people... Anybody.. Within reason.
Think that's as reasonable a reply as I could offer
 
Reactions: Alan Dugdales Moustache

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #62
Evo1883 said:
Britain since 2016 has taken in more refugees from outside the EU than any other EU state... I think we do our bit
Click to expand...

You for a source for that? Also 2016 is a very weird cut off considering the migrant crisis started a couple years prior to that.
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #63
shmmeee said:
You for a source for that? Also 2016 is a very weird cut off considering the migrant crisis started a couple years prior to that.
Click to expand...

No specific reason for a 2016 cut off, it was just the dates that full fact. Com threw at me.
I may or may not be 100% correct or incorrect according to this, who knows, we do our bit anyway is the point.
Down the article we have claims made from 2016 to July 2019 .
E UK’S INDEPENDENT FACT CHECKING CHARITY

  1. Home
  2. Immigration
  3. Asylum seekers and refugees

How many refugees does the UK take in?

16th Aug 2019

Claim
In 2017 the UK resettled more refugees from outside Europe than any other EU member state.

Conclusion
Technically correct, but resettled refugees are only a subset of all refugees a country might take in. Overall, Germany, France, Austria and Sweden all granted asylum to more refugees than the UK did in 2017.

“In 2017 the UK resettled more refugees from outside Europe than any other EU member state (Eurostat figures).”

Migration Watch, 13 August 2019

In response to a journalist tweeting that “the only refugee the British government wants to support is a cartoon bear”, the think tank Migration Watch claimed that the UK resettled more refugees from outside Europe than any other EU member state in 2017. The government has previously made a similar claim: "Since 2016, Britain has resettled more refugees from outside Europe than any other EU state”.

Both statements are correct, but there’s some important context which many people might not have picked up from the wording.

The term “resettled” is very important here. “Resettled refugees” are not all refugees which a country might take in. It refers to refugees who were resettled in a new country as part of a specific scheme run by that country. Most refugees arrive in the EU as asylum seekers, not as people being resettled as part of a scheme.
 
Reactions: shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #64
Ah so quite an important caveat to that. Cheers.
 
Reactions: Evo1883

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #65
shmmeee said:
Ah so quite an important caveat to that. Cheers.
Click to expand...

It also puts a bit of a hole in the why don't they stay in the first safe country argument
 

skyblueusername

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #66
Theres talk of building a new Hong Kong right here in the UK.
Let's build Hong Kong 2.0 here in the UK - CapX
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #67
skyblueusername said:
Theres talk of building a new Hong Kong right here in the UK.
Let's build Hong Kong 2.0 here in the UK - CapX
Click to expand...

I was thinking about this and wondered where there was enough land... I thought Wales
 

skyblueusername

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #68
Evo1883 said:
I was thinking about this and wondered where there was enough land... I thought Wales
Click to expand...
On BBC radio yesterday they said somewhere on the coast in Scotland or Humberside were being considered.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #69
skyblueusername said:
On BBC radio yesterday they said somewhere on the coast in Scotland or Humberside were being considered.
Click to expand...
As long as it is not in my backyard, I am not really bothered.
 
Reactions: Alan Dugdales Moustache

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • #70
Evo1883 said:
I was thinking about this and wondered where there was enough land... I thought Wales
Click to expand...
East Anglia. The fens, Lincolnshire.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?