Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Course he is part of the decision but ultimately is told what to do by higher up the chain. He’s badly advised if he thinks it helps the situation and if he knows it’s not going to help what’s he playing at!!!
Course he is part of the decision but ultimately is told what to do by higher up the chain. He’s badly advised if he thinks it helps the situation and if he knows it’s not going to help what’s he playing at!!!At companies house Tim Fisher is listed as a person of "significant interest" in the companies operating CCFC. Therefore, as you've stated - he does have control over the legal process. Grendal thinks he has no control....if that's the case then the submission to companies house is false and that is against the law!
He's a Director and he has statutory responsibilities, along with legal control over the business. Keep up with the law!Fisher has no strategic impact into the club. He has no control and no influence
Spot on! If Otium folds, then the assets [none] are distributed to creditors & there is nothing for a Supporters Trust.Suspect this is correct. They seem to have some misguided notion that if Otium folds the club will be handed over to them when in reality it will cease to exist. There's even a note in the minutes of a recent Trust board meeting for them to get an update off Hoffman!
Agree - there is a question that as a Director of the company ....is he acting in the "best interests" of that company?Course he is part of the decision but ultimately is told what to do by higher up the chain. He’s badly advised if he thinks it helps the situation and if he knows it’s not going to help what’s he playing at!!!
Sisu also have significant control... That's the thing, they pick and choose directorsHe's a Director and he has statutory responsibilities, along with legal control over the business. Keep up with the law!
I'd say you can make the argument he is... however much we may not like that argument.Agree - there is a question that as a Director of the company ....is he acting in the "best interests" of that company?
Aren’t players assets ?Spot on! If Otium folds, then the assets [none] are distributed to creditors & there is nothing for a Supporters Trust.
Not convinced by that tbh.but they are here to stay
Hope you're right NW but can't see any scenario as yet for it not to be otherwiseNot convinced by that tbh.
Least time it was asked the councillor suggested somewhere he knew well couldn't ever have a stadium. It was already having houses builtThe one question that needs to be asked to the council is is there sufficient land anywhere within the city boundary where a suitable stadium could be built.
Who’s gonna build that then?The one question that needs to be asked to the council is is there sufficient land anywhere within the city boundary where a suitable stadium could be built.
He's there purely to spin and mislead, fisher part 2. Him and his mate from the council.
what an utter c**t this man is. Some of us just want CCFC to survive, to us it's more important than a pissing contest between two hedge funds.
Yeah it's irrelevant until we get competent owners with the interests of the club and its community at heart.Who’s gonna build that then?
I went to Shrewsbury and their ground stands in a spot which is being developed even now with new housing estates. Of course access and parking becomes an issue but as an example there’s lots of land next to the Higgs which is as we speak is being redeveloped and there is industrial land not a stones throw from the Ricoh, as for who builds it at the moment Bob.Least time it was asked the councillor suggested somewhere he knew well couldn't ever have a stadium. It was already having houses built
I'm thinking more after sisu for that!!
He's a Director and he has statutory responsibilities, along with legal control over the business. Keep up with the law!
The blokes an idiot. Unfortunately the prominence the Trust give him means people listen to him and his cohort and rubbish like this starts getting thrown around as fact.
what an utter c**t this man is. Some of us just want CCFC to survive, to us it's more important than a pissing contest between two hedge funds.
A bit harsh that! Maybe he is just a concerned fan (same as you and I) looking at things with a different viewpoint?
what an utter c**t this man is. Some of us just want CCFC to survive, to us it's more important than a pissing contest between two hedge funds.
Where does that say anything about a boycott.
Here we have a new addition to the trust board
Apparently all fake members on here.
Where does that say anything about a boycott.
It is. That's my point that doesn't seem to sink in.I have no idea who the person is running that account but it’s nothing to do with us.
Where does that say anything about a boycott.
Don't call me a fake, Nick!Here we have a new addition to the trust board
Apparently all fake members on here.
It is. That's my point that doesn't seem to sink in.
Have a read of your last meeting minutes, or just keep pretending.
You don't want to accept it or listen
Somebody called Tim with a link to Jimmy hill way and a thing for cov ladies? Must be a few of them at the board meetings?Where does it say those accounts have got anything to do with us and who is it that is running them as I’d love to know. I genuinely don’t.
Somebody called Tim with a link to Jimmy hill way and a thing for cov ladies? Must be a few of them at the board meetings?
Really answer me then.Yes you really are literally grasping
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?