same people who say Putin/russia aren't really a threat and should be given part of Ukraine and then everything will be great.These are the same people who say they don't want Russia as a neighbour...when they're only 4Km apart.
This seems like a surefire way to encourage both Russia and China to look to take land it sees as theirs for their own 'national security'.Believes is an interesting choice of word there. I'm guessing there wasn't a follow up question asking Bessent if he agreed with the president.
Framing it as a security issue is crazy when at the same time you're destabilising NATO and attempting to drive division in Europe. I'm sure its just a coincidence that they are also objectives of Putin.
Look forward to the announcement from Trump that America is being handed back to the natives.it’s only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago
It doesn't help US security, as they can do all that already under NATO, it hinders it. Only thing it does is gives the US a load of rare earth minerals.
Look forward to the announcement from Trump that America is being handed back to the natives.
Russia's argument for trying to take all of Ukraine was for their national security. Many argue that if Russia does get to hold the territory it currently holds in Ukraine it will regroup and try and take a weakened Ukraine (want Ukraine disarmed in any peace deal and don't care about external security guarantees as they've been largely ineffectual to date)This seems like a surefire way to encourage both Russia and China to look to take land it sees as theirs for their own 'national security'.
That they can't process as China controls processing. Again (like Venezuela) many US companies unwilling to invest big money in case Democrats get back in and refuse to use military to protect investments. Also if Democrats take control of Congress in mid-terms (as seems likely) there wouldn't be funds for the likes of Greenland/Venezuela.Only thing it does is gives the US a load of rare earth minerals.
President Donald Trump’s duties on imported goods are paid almost entirely by American importers, their domestic customers and ultimately US consumers, a study from a German think tank concluded.
“Foreign exporters did not meaningfully reduce their prices in response to US tariff increases,” a report released Monday by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy said. “The $200 billion surge in customs revenue represents $200 billion extracted from American businesses and households.”
The study found that only about 4% of the tariff burden is shouldered by foreign firms, with a “near-complete” pass-through of 96% to US buyers that pay the levies and then must either absorb them or raise selling prices. Manufacturers and retailers are next in line in deciding whether they’ll pass along their higher costs or deal with tighter margins.
Least he’s great at cheating at golf ehWe all knew this would be the case, but nice to see it actually studied and reported on.
Would be good to see someone put this to him - though of course it'll just be brushed off as fake news by him and his supporters.
No pretext Oh,now it appears
Believes is an interesting choice of word there. I'm guessing there wasn't a follow up question asking Bessent if he agreed with the president.
Framing it as a security issue is crazy when at the same time you're destabilising NATO and attempting to drive division in Europe. I'm sure its just a coincidence that they are also objectives of Putin.
Can't use the fentinol or mental patients shtick what now for the nobel peace champion?We all knew this would be the case, but nice to see it actually studied and reported on.
Would be good to see someone put this to him - though of course it'll just be brushed off as fake news by him and his supporters.
There was a time when you’d just laugh at this type of thing. Now you have to google first to check it’s not true
Are they even seeing an increase in Americans buying more domestically produced stuff? That was the other aim of this masterplan of his.We all knew this would be the case, but nice to see it actually studied and reported on.
Would be good to see someone put this to him - though of course it'll just be brushed off as fake news by him and his supporters.
"They're talking about a very long-term, powerful lease, a very strong lease, about 140 years actually. That's a long time, and I think we'll be inclined to go along with your country."Shockingly, our “brilliant” NATO Ally, the United Kingdom, is currently planning to give away the Island of Diego Garcia, the site of a vital U.S. Military Base, to Mauritius, and to do so FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER.
There is no doubt that China and Russia have noticed this act of total weakness. These are International Powers who only recognize STRENGTH, which is why the United States of America, under my leadership, is now, after only one year, respected like never before.
The UK giving away extremely important land is an act of GREAT STUPIDITY, and is another in a very long line of National Security reasons why Greenland has to be acquired.
Denmark and its European Allies have to DO THE RIGHT THING. Thank you for your attention to this matter. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP.
I don't normally advocate this but I genuinely think that we are getting close to the time when someone needs to be let through the cordon and see him off ala JFK. He's an arsehole but an arsehole in a very powerful position and its a very dangerous combination for the world as a whole.The point he’s missing on Greenland is no one need take over a sovereign country
What type of twat is he
Canada are just laughing in his face so should everyone else
The country is more likely to have civil war between militias before then. It’d be the perfect excuse to suspend the next election.I don't normally advocate this but I genuinely think that we are getting close to the time when someone needs to be let through the cordon and see him off ala JFK. He's an arsehole but an arsehole in a very powerful position and its a very dangerous combination for the world as a whole.
who would come next thoI don't normally advocate this but I genuinely think that we are getting close to the time when someone needs to be let through the cordon and see him off ala JFK. He's an arsehole but an arsehole in a very powerful position and its a very dangerous combination for the world as a whole.
An actual psycho.who would come next tho
Depends who's behind him I guess, at the time.who would come next tho
I don't think we should be laughing in the face of the leader of the most valuable military ally we have. Yes, he's all of those things but I would HOPE there are people with level heads working hard behind the scenes to fine some dipolmatic sweetner.The point he’s missing on Greenland is no one need take over a sovereign country
What type of twat is he
Canada are just laughing in his face so should everyone else
Tried itI don't think we should be laughing in the face of the leader of the most valuable military ally we have. Yes, he's all of those things but I would HOPE there are people with level heads working hard behind the scenes to fine some dipolmatic sweetner.
Think that would be pretty catastrophic for all kinds of reasonsI don't normally advocate this but I genuinely think that we are getting close to the time when someone needs to be let through the cordon and see him off ala JFK. He's an arsehole but an arsehole in a very powerful position and its a very dangerous combination for the world as a whole.
Well smaller countries but they are still 4 of the g7 and there are 230 countries and lots of allies available without russsia china North Korea and USAThink that would be pretty catastrophic for all kinds of reasons
As others have said, if the United States no longer plans on being a reliable partner to its allies then smaller countries have to figure out how to decouple and scale up themselves. Won’t be easy or especially safe.
Indeed, and his morals are the only thing that can stop him apparentlyTried it
He’s inconsistent emotional and has no moral framework whatsoever
Think that would be pretty catastrophic for all kinds of reasons
As others have said, if the United States no longer plans on being a reliable partner to its allies then smaller countries have to figure out how to decouple and scale up themselves. Won’t be easy or especially safe.
when did he have itI’m seriously starting to question whether he is losing it mentally.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?