Among those messages, Epstein said in 2018 about US President Donald Trump: "I know how dirty donald is" and "I am the one able to take him down".
She was FrenchMore and more of these coming out
She was French
And I'm sure this has absolutely nothing to with Epstein's 'suicide'
She was French
And her dad supported Labour. Checkmate.
If you don’t care about what happens in the US why are you on this thread?I think you’ve missed the point - she’s irrelevant
If you don’t care about what happens in the US why are you on this thread?
She's a British citizen.But you’ve said the concern is because Maxwell is British. So if she wasn’t there’s nothing to see?
She's a British citizen.
That’s a mighty stretch I’ll give you that.So what? So are you saying we should be more concerned by her crimes than non uk citizens raping 12 year olds in Bristol now?
Fucking hell
Telegraph without bias??Oh dear latest telegraph revelations make the embarrassing behaviour by the BBC get worse
Telegraph without bias??
Do you think that anyone who selectively edits a Trump speech to make a point and doesn’t disclose it should resign?it’s been acknowledged the same doctored clip was on news night in 2022 and concerns were raised and the person raising it was told to remain silent
Do you think that anyone who selectively edits a Trump speech to make a point and doesn’t disclose it should resign?
Megyn Kelly: "I know somebody very close to this case…Jeffrey Epstein, in this person's view, was not a pedophile…He was into the barely legal type, like he liked 15 year old girls…He wasn't into like 8 year olds…There's a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old."
She’s right it is very different but not in terms of criminalityUgh. These fucking people.
The victims do not have to be below legal age for what he's done to be a crime either.Ugh. These fucking people.
In which case I have some bad news about the Prescott memoIf it’s in the BBC then yes
I don't know what sickens me more. The way people will make attempts like this to defend the indefensible or the fact that there are Trump supporters who will happily nod along in agreement.Ugh. These fucking people.
In which case I have some bad news about the Prescott memo
EXCLUSIVE: Michael Prescott himself doctored Trump quote in his anti-BBC report
A report alleging Panorama broadcast misleading Trump quotes contains misleading quotes itselfwww.thenewworld.co.uk
Did you read the article? Or the memo itself? He selectively edited Donald Trump’s January 6 speech without disclosing it to the viewer in order to alter its meaning. This is apparently a resigning issue - he must go.Why is that bad news?
Did you read the article? Or the memo itself? He selectively edited Donald Trump’s January 6 speech without disclosing it to the viewer in order to alter its meaning. This is apparently a resigning issue - he must go.
His role as an independent adviser to the BBC is surely untenable? I assume you think an apology would be merited at the very least.Go where? He doesn’t work for the bbc does he?
His role as an independent adviser to the BBC is surely untenable? I assume you think an apology would be merited at the very least.
My mistake - it turns out he’s actually French.I honestly thought he’d left the role in June
I don't know what sickens me more. The way people will make attempts like this to defend the indefensible or the fact that there are Trump supporters who will happily nod along in agreement.
TBF the Telegraph isn't a state broadcaster paid for by public licence. You expect bias from many news outlets but the BBC should be totally impartial.The sheer irony of this when the Telegraph, who pushed this story, have been functioning as a Tory propaganda paper for years.
Impartiality is itself subjective and very difficult if not impossible to achieve to everyone's satisfaction. They showed him saying words he actually said and correctly conveyed the point of the speech/rally.TBF the Telegraph isn't a state broadcaster paid for by public licence. You expect bias from many news outlets but the BBC should be totally impartial.
TBF the Telegraph isn't a state broadcaster paid for by public licence. You expect bias from many news outlets but the BBC should be totally impartial.
Why? Shouldn't everyone have to have the integrity to not misrepresent the facts and not mislead the public? Or is it OK if someone's bankrolling you to just do what you like?If it’s in the BBC then yes
Just wait till RFK developes his defensive strategy further,8 yrs old FFS.Ugh. These fucking people.
Apparently it’s a huge scandal when the BBC edits Trump’s speeches without disclosing it, but when an independent (lol) adviser does the same thing in a memo used to undermine the BBC’s credibility then it’s no big deal because he already left in June.Why? Shouldn't everyone have to have the integrity to not misrepresent the facts and not mislead the public? Or is it OK if someone's bankrolling you to just do what you like?
If the BBC was funded by left leaning activists would it be have been OK for them to have gone even further in misrepresenting the speech, because it'd be privately funded rather than paid for by the public?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?