mmttww
Well-Known Member
I'll admit that you using the word 'decency' is a LOL.
Just admit you think it’s justified without trying to worm around it, at least the Majority that disagreed with him on here have the decency to say he didn’t deserve to die. You on the other hand mr gif man
He did, but the way he presented the results was to score points and stoke the flames, demean people who did turn up. Outside of his events, he actively sought to silence people through doxxing academics he disagreed with.
Did he have reasoned debates? All the "debates" I have seen of his seem to be him answering other questions apart from the ones asked and attempted gotchas.
Tbf him and Tony are the only ones that haven’t expressed any empathy for what happened. At least everyone else has had some decencyno, he's allowed to say he didn't agree with his claims he was about debate.
My point proven, just admit it will make you look more of a man.I'll admit that you using the word 'decency' is a LOL.
yeah and i've watch lots of them and they all follow a similar narrative.There's plenty.
This forum/thread is a good example of what Im talking about. You will see the point scoring is rife, even on a bloody Cov forum, imagine us all getting together and doing it face to face at a Uniyeah and i've watch lots of them and they all follow a similar narrative.
he also never met a strawman he didn't like
It wasn’t all he didPolitical discourse is the cornerstone of any democracy. The ability to sit and discuss things with those with differing opinions is how voices are heard and change is made. Its not just about getting your point across, it's about learning to understand the thoughts and feelings of those with different life experiences, different social standings, different races, colours and creeds. It's only by learning how others perceive the world that true change can begin to happen. Social media is not the place for that as far too often it descends into chaos, mud slinging, and insults.
What Charlie Kirk did, whether you agree with his views or not, is show people that you can sit and have reasoned debate, face to face, and remain civil. The need to silence this kind of interaction stems purely from an inability to articulate, or understand your own or others feelings. I hope that his murder does not deter people from speaking out, collaborating, or listening ,because whichever political side you sit, the greatest weapon we have as humans is tolerance and understanding.
We don't have to always agree, but we can at least agree to disagree, a skill that seems to be disappearing rapidly at the moment.
Yes but no one can say this is "reasoned debate"This forum/thread is a good example of what Im talking about. You will see the point scoring is rife, even on a bloody Cov forum, imagine us all getting together and doing it face to face at a Uni
There is a huge difference between winning a debate and demeaning people. If your argument doesn't hold up then that isn't being demeaned really is it. If a man in a dress is calling you a Nazi and you politely explain why you aren't, is that demeaning?
Maybe if the professors had been more open to discussing things instead of mud slinging things could've been different. Just shows the importance of open dialogue doesn't itIt wasn’t all he did
Read some of the abuse professors received who he listed on his turning point website
No, no nothing excuses doxing people and potentially putting their lives at risk.Maybe if the professors had been more open to discussing things instead of mud slinging things could've been different. Just shows the importance of open dialogue doesn't it
Not sure that’s fair. They were mainly doing their job. Of course Charlie Kirk didn’t send emails or phone or harrass but people acted on account of what he said about their opinionsMaybe if the professors had been more open to discussing things instead of mud slinging things could've been different. Just shows the importance of open dialogue doesn't it
proper question is this so radical it shud be stopped https://www.professorwatchlist.org/professor/shobitaparthasarathyNo, no nothing excuses doxing people and potentially putting their lives at risk.
Did he have reasoned debates? All the "debates" I have seen of his seem to be him answering other questions apart from the ones asked and attempted gotchas.
No but it involves abortion, it is a very valid belief that 6 weeks is far too soon but it is still abortion which is like red meat to some in the US.proper question is this so radical it shud be stopped https://www.professorwatchlist.org/professor/shobitaparthasarathy
first cuple i clicked on prob should be sacked but this was third
I haven't whitewashed him. I disagreed with lots of what he believed in, but I had the ability to agree to disagree and not shoot anyoneNot sure that’s fair. They were mainly doing their job. Of course Charlie Kirk didn’t send emails or phone or harrass but people acted on account of what he said about their opinions
You can’t whitewash him. None of it meant it was appropriate to murder him in cold blood of course and his family and friends will obviously be in bits
trying to silence views with this one too https://www.professorwatchlist.org/professor/richarddwolffNo but it involves abortion, it is a very valid belief that 6 weeks is far too soon but it is still abortion which is like red meat to some in the US.
This is the same US where people get killed by nutcases over abortion.
You said this to be fair "Maybe if the professors had been more open to discussing things instead of mud slinging things could've been different. Just shows the importance of open dialogue doesn't it" which is not trye as most people on "professor watch" did no such thing.I haven't whitewashed him. I disagreed with lots of what he believed in, but I had the ability to agree to disagree and not shoot anyone
As do we allI haven't whitewashed him. I disagreed with lots of what he believed in, but I had the ability to agree to disagree and not shoot anyone
Yep, Richard Wolf is just a left wing economist. He's actually pretty mainstream.trying to silence views with this one too https://www.professorwatchlist.org/professor/richarddwolff
there are some nutters who shud be sacked tweeting better to kill people but things lick this are standard and you can do a book on friedman if you lick to!
Should be made a crime really thenNo, no nothing excuses doxing people and potentially putting their lives at risk.
Not all it seemsAs do we all
??? ok that makes it all fine thenShould be made a crime really then
You see! This is already turned into sarcasm after about 4 messages. It kind of proves my point??? ok that makes it all fine then
Political discourse is the cornerstone of any democracy. The ability to sit and discuss things with those with differing opinions is how voices are heard and change is made. Its not just about getting your point across, it's about learning to understand the thoughts and feelings of those with different life experiences, different social standings, different races, colours and creeds. It's only by learning how others perceive the world that true change can begin to happen. Social media is not the place for that as far too often it descends into chaos, mud slinging, and insults.
What Charlie Kirk did, whether you agree with his views or not, is show people that you can sit and have reasoned debate, face to face, and remain civil. The need to silence this kind of interaction stems purely from an inability to articulate, or understand your own or others feelings. I hope that his murder does not deter people from speaking out, collaborating, or listening ,because whichever political side you sit, the greatest weapon we have as humans is tolerance and understanding.
We don't have to always agree, but we can at least agree to disagree, a skill that seems to be disappearing rapidly at the moment.
Sarcasm is a valid response.You see! This is already turned into sarcasm after about 4 messages. It kind of proves my point
Publishing the Epstein files would endanger a lot of people too but im all for it.Sarcasm is a valid response.
You do seem to be whitewashing the actions he did that endangered people who had nothing to do with him?
Before anyone gets upset, it is never a reason to kill someone but it is an absolutely horrible thing to do and yes should be illegal.
Bit of a difference between a list of sexual predators and a list of innocent people who have committed no crimePublishing the Epstein files would endanger a lot of people too but im all for it.
Where’s she said about him being shot?Mask is slipping for a lot of the self proclaimed “nice people”
This tweet for me summed it up for me. Jeremy Clarkson expressing concern about the safety of voicing his opinions, to be told by a “comedian” that so long as he shuts up he won’t be shot
View attachment 45985
Tbf she's about as much of a comedian as he is a cyclistMask is slipping for a lot of the self proclaimed “nice people”
This tweet for me summed it up for me. Jeremy Clarkson expressing concern about the safety of voicing his opinions, to be told by a “comedian” that so long as he shuts up he won’t be shot
View attachment 45985
He said he'd execute striking workers in front of their families so I don't have much sympathy for him in this situation. Blokes a knob.Mask is slipping for a lot of the self proclaimed “nice people”
This tweet for me summed it up for me. Jeremy Clarkson expressing concern about the safety of voicing his opinions, to be told by a “comedian” that so long as he shuts up he won’t be shot
View attachment 45985
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?