Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
I was being balanced lol
You think that was all cheers? Ok
I was being balanced lolClearly isn’t, lie to yourself though if it makes you feel better
That’s the 38% approval rate
Any excuse ey, funny how brain dead people like yourself are. Try and think of any way possible to spin somethingOn radio 5 Live before final they said his image was planned to be on screen whilst the national anthem was played as US sports fans dont tend to boo during that.
Sensitive guy, is Donald.
Oh my God I'm so offended and delicate.Any excuse ey, funny how brain dead people like yourself are. Try and think of any way possible to spin something
I’m sure trump will be absolutely devastated, will probably cancel the trip now! A weak man shouting bad words at him is the way to go
Polanski is a clown. He said the other day if shop lifters proved they were poor they shouldn’t be classed as committing a crime. Very anti female safe spaces as well.
Not sure why they chose him. Charisma, perhaps? He's an ex actor isn't he.Polanski is a clown. He said the other day if shop lifters proved they were poor they shouldn’t be classed as committing a crime. Very anti female safe spaces as well.
Charisma? Come on Otis we actually get on alright, the guy has 0 charismaNot sure why they chose him. Charisma, perhaps? He's an ex actor isn't he.
Anyway, whoever is in government HAS to work with Trump, it's as simple as that.
Not sure why they chose him. Charisma, perhaps? He's an ex actor isn't he.
Anyway, whoever is in government HAS to work with Trump, it's as simple as that.
Blokes an absolute titAlso a hypnotherapist - he got stung by a journalist posing as someone who wanted her breasts enlarged
An enlarged one by the sounds of it.Blokes an absolute tit
He’s not a serious person. He killed whatever credibility he had by saying that Graham Linehan arrest was ‘proportionate’…Polanski is a clown. He said the other day if shop lifters proved they were poor they shouldn’t be classed as committing a crime. Very anti female safe spaces as well.
Are they ACTUALLY going to call it that?He’s not a serious person. He killed whatever credibility he had by saying that Graham Linehan arrest was ‘proportionate’…
Naturally, he’ll be skewered on national TV so quickly retreated to the safe spaces of podcast where we can talk to like minded people.
If he remains in post and the ‘Your Party’ doesn’t get off the ground, Labour might actually hold ‘the left’ of the electorate.
Naturally, he’ll be skewered on national TV so quickly retreated to the safe spaces of podcast where we can talk to like minded people.
That won't be the Greens so Mr P can say what he likes.Not sure why they chose him. Charisma, perhaps? He's an ex actor isn't he.
Anyway, whoever is in government HAS to work with Trump, it's as simple as that.
To some extent, yes because the outreach of the podcasts he was on (Theo Von, Joe Rogan etc.) was great for a) young men, b) people who didn’t vote and c) “independents”.I’m genuinely curious on this - that was Trump’s (successful) strategy for his presidential campaign. Why are we to assume that it wouldn’t be the case here? I appreciate the ‘party standing’ angle is different but the method of campaigning surely either works or it doesn’t?
For anyone to succeed in the current climate they need to get their message out in as many different 'short' forms as possible. Attention spans are very low, even podcasts are mostly just used to create 'viral' clips and that requires a skill set few politicians have.To some extent, yes because the outreach of the podcasts he was on (Theo Von, Joe Rogan etc.) was great for a) young men, b) people who didn’t vote and c) “independents”.
Kamala Harris went on podcasts but the talking points were much more controlled from what’s emerged post-election. As a candidate, the people seen of her, the less they liked her and broadly speaking, the opposite was true for Trump.
For all of Trump’s flaws, I personally thought he was somewhat relatable in his podcasts.
Back to Polanski, his guest list will be a who’s who of left wing activists and it’ll build a niche following. The worry is that if you build a popular podcast speaking to essentially an echo chamber, an inexperienced leader may mistake that for genuine popular policies. When it comes to elections, he’ll need to face people he disagrees with and that’s where I think he’ll completely fold or he’ll say something stupid like people should be arrested/jailed for tweets.
To some extent, yes because the outreach of the podcasts he was on (Theo Von, Joe Rogan etc.) was great for a) young men, b) people who didn’t vote and c) “independents”.
Kamala Harris went on podcasts but the talking points were much more controlled from what’s emerged post-election. As a candidate, the people seen of her, the less they liked her and broadly speaking, the opposite was true for Trump.
For all of Trump’s flaws, I personally thought he was somewhat relatable in his podcasts.
Back to Polanski, his guest list will be a who’s who of left wing activists and it’ll build a niche following. The worry is that if you build a popular podcast speaking to essentially an echo chamber, an inexperienced leader may mistake that for genuine popular policies. When it comes to elections, he’ll need to face people he disagrees with and that’s where I think he’ll completely fold or he’ll say something stupid like people should be arrested/jailed for tweets.
With respect to Kamala Harris, she was clearly unable to speak aboutFor anyone to succeed in the current climate they need to get their message out in as many different 'short' forms as possible. Attention spans are very low, even podcasts are mostly just used to create 'viral' clips and that requires a skill set few politicians have.
Fair. Are there any UK-based podcasts that you would suggest are ‘good’ targets? I’m not aware of a Rogan-equivalent (not that I listen to that, to be honest). So could it be that the UK podcast landscape doesn’t have the same reach/impact?
Polanski has started his own podcast which has gone straight into the Top 10 in the UK. The Rest is Politics and the News Agents are consistently at the top of the charts so there's definitely an outlet.
How much of an impact it could have is a whole other question.
Polanski has started his own podcast which has gone straight into the Top 10 in the UK. The Rest is Politics and the News Agents are consistently at the top of the charts so there's definitely an outlet.
How much of an impact it could have is a whole other question.
I’d like to know what % of listeners were non-Green party members.Polanski has started his own podcast which has gone straight into the Top 10 in the UK. The Rest is Politics and the News Agents are consistently at the top of the charts so there's definitely an outlet.
How much of an impact it could have is a whole other question.
I doubt the Green Party have enough members that even if every single one of them listened to it wouldn't make the top 10 so there must be a decent amount of non-members listening.I’d like to know what % of listeners were non-Green party members.
They'd all be pretty green if he'd only just started it.I’d like to know what % of listeners were non-Green party members.
To some extent, yes because the outreach of the podcasts he was on (Theo Von, Joe Rogan etc.) was great for a) young men, b) people who didn’t vote and c) “independents”.
Kamala Harris went on podcasts but the talking points were much more controlled from what’s emerged post-election. As a candidate, the people seen of her, the less they liked her and broadly speaking, the opposite was true for Trump.
For all of Trump’s flaws, I personally thought he was somewhat relatable in his podcasts.
Back to Polanski, his guest list will be a who’s who of left wing activists and it’ll build a niche following. The worry is that if you build a popular podcast speaking to essentially an echo chamber, an inexperienced leader may mistake that for genuine popular policies. When it comes to elections, he’ll need to face people he disagrees with and that’s where I think he’ll completely fold or he’ll say something stupid like people should be arrested/jailed for tweets.
Interesting, I think a lot of folk would agree with arresting people who advocate stuff like burning down hotels full of people.
Does that cause you a problem?
Who decided that Lucy Connolly was guilty?Either Ricky Jones and Lucy Connolly are both guilty of incitement or none of them are.
Its YouTube views (39k) was about half the total Green Party membership (65k). The first guest, Ash Sarkar (Novara) has a reasonably large following (400k+ on Twitter).I doubt the Green Party have enough members that even if every single one of them listened to it wouldn't make the top 10 so there must be a decent amount of non-members listening.
Ash Sarkar is fitIts YouTube views (39k) was about half the total Green Party membership (65k). The first guest, Ash Sarkar (Novara) has a reasonably large following (400k+ on Twitter).
Without getting into the nitty gritty, she was encouraged to plead guilty.Who decided that Lucy Connolly was guilty?
The lengths people will go to make excuses for this woman are truly astounding sometimes.Without getting into the nitty gritty, she was encouraged to plead guilty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?