Trump is my favourite comedian of the year already (16 Viewers)

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
It doesn't really matter how much you write. If you think Linehan getting arrested, or Lucy Connolly getting banged up for as long as she did is a good thing, then you can't be taken seriously on matters such as this, and probably not anything else that would constitute the real world.

The irony is you both moan about free speech when it doesn't go your way (which is oddly usually regarding some pretty unsavoury figures who hate the UK, or terrorist organisations), but then take stand points like this. It is massive hypocrisy. The country now has a spotlight on us regarding said free speech, and it is clowns like the both of you who have set the standard in why that is the case.
Do you think he broke the law Earlsdon?
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
The irony is you both moan about free speech when it doesn't go your way (which is oddly usually regarding some pretty unsavoury figures who hate the UK, or terrorist organisations), but then take stand points like this. It is massive hypocrisy. The country now has a spotlight on us regarding said free speech, and it is clowns like the both of you who have set the standard in why that is the case.

I mean that applies to both sides doesn't it?

The right continually contradict themselves on free speech too.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Do you think he broke the law Earlsdon?

Lucy Connelly deserved the same sentence as someone who directly said they’d Kill J K Rowling. A small prison sentence deferred

I can’t see what crime Linehan has committed and even Starmer agrees.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Lucy Connelly deserved the same sentence as someone who directly said they’d Kill J K Rowling. A small prison sentence deferred

I can’t see what crime Linehan has committed and even Starmer agrees.
I tend to agree with this and Linehan is a comedy writer. I read that as a bit tongue in cheek, rather than an incitement to violence.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Absolute bollocks again, he exposes all the hateful weirdos in this country and does a good job at it

He also laughs at starving children. If you think that's 'doing a good job' then I'd hate to see what constitutes a bad job in your eyes.

I know you're Team Israel, but do you think Gazan children starving to death is funny?
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Lucy Connelly deserved the same sentence as someone who directly said they’d Kill J K Rowling. A small prison sentence deferred

I can’t see what crime Linehan has committed and even Starmer agrees.
Incitement to violence linehan overkill how the police dealt with arrest and can’t see how it’s political
Youll have to explain how Lucy’s tweet is the same as some random hoping jk Rowling comes to an end
Some of them sure incite people to act
It’s the law though not starmer stazi
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
He also laughs at starving children. If you think that's 'doing a good job' then I'd hate to see what constitutes a bad job in your eyes.

I know you're Team Israel, but do you think Gazan children starving to death is funny?
I ain’t team either of them, I don’t like either.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
What do you think should happen to the people who sent these to JK Rowling?

Caveat: Assuming these are real and not fakes.

View attachment 45931View attachment 45932View attachment 45933View attachment 45934

Treat them the same under the law, assuming they can be identified. Did you actually think I'd say anything different?

You're falling into the worst far right myth there is.

Even though I'm unashamedly on the left, I believe you follow the law or you take the consequences. And that applies to everybody, PM, President, or pauper. Would you not agree?

Sometimes the right seem to have the idea that the law should only be enforced against people they don't like, and people they do like should be able to say and do exactly what they want.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Treat them the same under the law, assuming they can be identified. Did you actually think I'd say anything different?

You're falling into the worst far right myth there is.

Even though I'm unashamedly on the left, I believe you follow the law or you take the consequences. And that applies to everybody, PM, President, or pauper. Would you not agree?

Sometimes the right seem to have the idea that the law should only be enforced against people they don't like, and people they do like should be able to say and do exactly what they want.

Many have been identified and it wasn’t investigated- I fail to see how defending women’s rights is somehow a right wing ideology- you seem deranged
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
I tend to agree with this and Linehan is a comedy writer. I read that as a bit tongue in cheek, rather than an incitement to violence.

When it comes to this issue mate, you've only got to look at his history. He's in court right now over it, and his hatred of trans women is very well documented. Good luck to him claiming it's a joke, he doesn't seem to have been in a hurry to apologise for any misunderstanding....
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Treat them the same under the law, assuming they can be identified. Did you actually think I'd say anything different?

You're falling into the worst far right myth there is.

Even though I'm unashamedly on the left, I believe you follow the law or you take the consequences. And that applies to everybody, PM, President, or pauper. Would you not agree?

Sometimes the right seem to have the idea that the law should only be enforced against people they don't like, and people they do like should be able to say and do exactly what they want.
I think those examples are far worse. Linehan's tweet was not a serious call to harm someone, anyway he is suing the Met, we'll see if they acted within the law and reasonably by sending 5 armed officers to arrest him after he landed at Heathrow, my bet is he will win his case.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
When it comes to this issue mate, you've only got to look at his history. He's in court right now over it, and his hatred of trans women is very well documented. Good luck to him claiming it's a joke, he doesn't seem to have been in a hurry to apologise for any misunderstanding....

If you are comfortably with biological men sharing changing rooms with women it’s pretty disgusting tbh
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
I think those examples are far worse. Linehan's tweet was not a serious call to harm someone, anyway he is suing the Met, we'll see if they acted within the law and reasonably by sending 5 armed officers to arrest him after he landed at Heathrow, my bet is he will win his case.

Are you going for it was just a joke defence? Pretty thin mate. Either your support the law or you don't, why is that so hard to accept?

Given his history, it's not unreasonable to assume he meant it. You do know his history on this, right?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
Are you going for it was just a joke defence? Pretty thin mate. Either your support the law or you don't, why is that so hard to accept?

Given his history, it's not unreasonable to assume he meant it. You do know his history on this, right?
I agree with him that so called trans women are men and they should keep out of womens toilets.

JK Rowling, Sharron Davies, Martina Navratilova also think the same I believe.

What's more, the dear leader also said..
lightshot_1757427034.jpeg
 
Last edited:

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
I note you didn't deny finding starving children funny.
Making stuff up once again, of course that’s awful but you are just making wild claims which are definitely not true. Good try though ‘pva’

What are your thoughts on what happened on October the 7th?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Making stuff up once again, of course that’s awful but you are just making wild claims which are definitely not true. Good try though ‘pva’

What are your thoughts on what happened on October the 7th?

He thinks victims of child rape and showing authorities on dolls where the victim abused them is an acceptable form of humour
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member
I agree with him that so called trans women are men and they should keep out of womens toilets.

JK Rowling, Sharron Davies, Martina Navratilova also think the same I believe.

What's more, the dear leader also said..
View attachment 45943
There has to be safe spaces for women. It really is that simple.

It's not knocking Trans, it's just making sure women are protected.

A lot of places are now having unisex toilets and I think that is a pretty safe way to go.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Making stuff up once again, of course that’s awful but you are just making wild claims which are definitely not true. Good try though ‘pva’

What are your thoughts on what happened on October the 7th?

Which part is not true?

Obviously what happened on Oct 7th was horrific, I don't think you'll find anyone here saying otherwise so that's a really poor attempt at a gotcha.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
I agree with him that so called trans women are men and they should keep out of womens toilets.

JK Rowling, Sharron Davies, Martina Navratilova also think the same I believe.

What's more, the dear leader also said..
View attachment 45943

I'm quite capable of coming to my own view on it. The only fuckwits blindly following a "Dear Leader" type are the nonce fanboys cheering on Trump.

You're also obviously mistaking your opinion for the law. Whatever your opinion on trans women no one has the right to assault them, or to incite others to do so.

Or do you not believe in applying the law? I'm confused, isn't this what you were asking me?
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
for someone that acts and types like one, this is gold. You give a lot of time and energy to the cause, tbf. Good wumming. Shame that's as low as it gets, but at least you're good at something.
Wumming? Nah I just have a different opinion to you but hey, if you stop crying and bitching all the time I’ll tone it down. That post the other day where you said about the end game, it’s like you were in tears
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
So in summary, the right wing or perhaps 'Trumpian' position on the law is:

I agree with x, so even though he appears to be breaking the law, he shouldn't be arrested.

However, I don't agree with y, and he appears to be breaking the law, so I demand his arrest.

I think that's about the heart of it.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Genuinely interested in what you get from it all, why you put so much time and effort into stirring sh*t up?
Stirring what up? Having a different opinion to you? Calling you out for saying our flags are racist, get a grip. Shall I just agree with everything you say then just to please you
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
Wumming? Nah I just have a different opinion to you but hey, if you stop crying and bitching all the time I’ll tone it down. That post the other day where you said about the end game, it’s like you were in tears

Crying and bitching? Hmm.

My dear nonce fanboy (I do hope you don't mind me calling you that), literally all you've ever done here is whine.

But the 'libs' etc etc. quick somebody, call the Waaah-mbulance.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Crying and bitching? Hmm.

My dear nonce fanboy (I do hope you don't mind me calling you that), literally all you've ever done here is whine.

But the 'libs' etc etc. quick somebody, call the Waaah-mbulance.
Nonce fanboy, you think defending women's right are right wing and want men in women’s toilets. That’s about as weird as it gets, time to take a good look in the mirror
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top