Or you could look past your rediculous prejudice and actually close this forum down (just for 5 minutes, if you can, it won't kill you)
Im not aware of doctor Wakefield,
Calling mRNA therapies vaccines was not only done to associate them with something the majority of the public regards as 'safe & effective' but also to avoid liability for harms they might do.
this guy?
Science is about consensus, you can take any topic and find a handful of nutcases that will argue your chosen cause
It truelly is shocking the way the global population were duped into taking a gene therapy which was previously classed as unsuitable for use on humans.Calling mRNA therapies vaccines was not only done to associate them with something the majority of the public regards as 'safe & effective' but also to avoid liability for harms they might do.
In the UK vaccine liability is borne by tax payers and limited to £120,00 after a minimum of 60% disablement which in my view is wholly inadequate considering what 60% disabled means & of course diddly squat for up to 59% disabled, the scheme desperately needs reform. It's relatively rare this happens but it does and the covid vaccines proved much more harmful than traditional vaccines especially in 2021 I think because of poor quality control in the mad rush to provide enough doses to jab anybody and everybody.
Vaccine Damage Payment
A Vaccine Damage Payment is a one-off tax-free payment of £120,000 if you're severely disabled as a result of vaccination against certain diseases - what you'll get, eligibility and applying.www.gov.uk
That's the guy, I noticed that you've posted all the comments from those trying to shut him down and silence him.
An mRNA vaccine works by getting your cells to express the same antigen as the pathogen, without being exposed to the pathogen in any form. It therefore achieves the same purpose of the vaccine with if anything greater safety to the person receiving it.
Truelly shocking indeed, how long do you think we have left?
Genuine question, why would I spend my time listening to someone who is known to spread proven false information? There's a huge number of people qualified to speak about this subject, do you listen to all of them and check their sources or just believe this chap because he happens to align with your viewpoint?
Well, somebody with his views is now in charge of American health and overseeing outbreaks of diseases that are entirely preventable with the vaccines he's afraid of.
I don't particularly find Campbell all that informative he tends to analyse and explain in layman's terms single medical papers, however calling him a nutcase is absurd, he taught nurses for many years and wrote a text book based on his courses.
If you think vaccines entirely prevent disease then you're misinformed.
Or are completely safe however they are almost single handedly with antibiotics the reason most of us live long healthy livesIf you think vaccines entirely prevent disease then you're misinformed.
You know who else taught nurses for many years and wrote some text books? The entire global medical establishment.
Not every disease can be prevented by vaccination. However, diseases such as polio, measles and smallpox are entirely preventable by vaccination.If you think vaccines entirely prevent disease then you're misinformed.
He's not even a doctor of medicine is he? Isnt he a nurse?
www.midwesterndoctor.com
Which of these diseases would you prefer to have instead of the corresponding vaccine?Ending Medical Gaslighting
How the institution of medicine covers up the inevitable harms of its unsafe therapeutic toolbox.
If you choose not to believe it, or not to look into it, then that's fine, its entirely up to you.
I'd be happy to be vaccinated against any of those if I were likely to be exposed.
I had measles, it was a few days feeling poorly that's all. I also had Scarlet Fever for which there has never been a vaccine, pretty much the same a few days feeling poorly & confined to my bed. This was when I was maybe 6 or 7. It's nutritionally compromised and medically vulnerable children that may suffer more. Anyway the MMR vaccine isn't risk free, the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) records more deaths after MMR injections than measles deaths.
Surely you're less likely to be exposed because of the success of their respective vaccination programs?
It’s unethical for children to catch and potentially die from diseases for no good reason other than their parents’ stupidity.
This may be the most egregious lie of the lot. How I wish it were true.
I explained to you in simple terms how the mRNA vaccine works.
He's way more qualified than you or I, he also interviews highly qualified experts on his chanel, doctors, surgeons, pathologists, virologists, coroners etc etc. if you spent as much time educating yourself as you do trying to poo poo the truth (for some bizare reason) you might be more relevant.
Oh, so your the expert now are you!
Quite probably.