shmmeee
Well-Known Member
You don’t rate him?
I'll be astonished if Sakamoto was signed as our first choice RWB
He's a midfield playerYou don’t rate him?
Think your right no chance.that may be a waste of his talent and or energy. Dont think defending for long periods away the fancied away teams is what we brought him in for.I'll be astonished if Sakamoto was signed as our first choice RWB
He's a midfield player
He's a midfield player
Right wing back is a midfield position.
No I think Robins wanted him to play with the players most likely to be in 11 and given we were going to have most the ball would end up playing like an AM anyway. If he had started on the bench and come on at AM he would have ended up playing with the kids in the second halfIf it was necessity you’d play Burroughs there and not bring a kid on at AM for Palmer. This is SBT cope like when they wouldn’t accept Sheaf was signing.
It’s a defensive positionRight wing back is a midfield position.
If it was necessity you’d play Burroughs there and not bring a kid on at AM for Palmer. This is SBT cope like when they wouldn’t accept Sheaf was signing.
On this one I both agree and disagree. I think it depends on the player and what the manager really wants from the player.Right wing back is a midfield position.
Right wing back is a midfield position.
He hasn't been signed to play wing back.He will compete with O'Hare.Right wing back is a midfield position.
No I think Robins wanted him to play with the players most likely to be in 11 and given we were going to have most the ball would end up playing like an AM anyway. If he had started on the bench and come on at AM he would have ended up playing with the kids in the second half
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Your spot on,clearly he has been signed as an A.M.Why are people still arguing over this? It's patently obvious he was brought in as an attacking mid. Just because he's "versatile" and played RWB in the past doesn't mean that's what Robins wants from him. Robins is obviously looking at bringing in a proper RWB to play ahead of Burroughs who isn't a first teamer yet.
Can we finally put this one to bed please?
No because then Godden would have to play with the kids. Look at the side it's obvious he wanted the players most likely to be in the starting 11 to play together (other than Howley)Surely then you play two AMs and no Godden, or if Saka is first choice ahead of Palmer you start him.
Surely then you play two AMs and no Godden, or if Saka is first choice ahead of Palmer you start him.
Bored now. Any of our slightly dubious ITKs got any rumours?
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
It’s a defensive position
He’s never played RWB in his whole career judging off TransferMarkt. Mainly playing LW and RW for his previous club in Belgium and RM in a 4-4-2 in Japan.I'd have said this in the past, but take a look at some of the Heat Maps (Average Position) people posted.
Bidwell and BNC were almost always the furthest forward after Vik. @schmeee probably has a point.
Sakamoto played as a RWB at his last club. He started at RWB in his first game for us. I think he'll stay there.
If MR sees a WB as a 'midfielder', then his comment re: Tatsu as an 'attacking midfielder' says he'll be RWB.
You don’t rate him?
Right wing back is a midfield position.
It's on skysports transfer cenrreSomeone on Twitter reckons we've agreed a fee with Burnley for Bobby Thomas
Not sure on it but quotes a Sky reporter who has no record of it on his Twitter
He’s never played RWB in his whole career judging off TransferMarkt. Mainly playing LW and RW for his previous club in Belgium and RM in a 4-4-2 in Japan.
It's both a hybrid position really as it's both attacking and defensive. There is or should be less requirement to defend due to the three CBs on the field, the LCB/RCB should be able to cover the gaps left by a wing back pushing on.It’s a defensive position
Not if you’re defending it ain’t.Right wing back is a midfield position.
I know you love this theory he will be our starting wing back, and you could be right. From being at the game on Tuesday, I would be worried for two reasons if he was our starting RWB. 1) it would in some ways put a shackle on what looks to be a very exciting attacking player 2) he is very, very slight. Whilst he did fine against FGR, he didn't have a lot to do. I don't doubt his workrate and tenacity, but I think against Championship clubs it could prove to be a big concern. I will add a third that he likes to cut in on his left a lot, which will leave a gaping hole if he then goes on to lose the ball.If it was necessity you’d play Burroughs there and not bring a kid on at AM for Palmer. This is SBT cope like when they wouldn’t accept Sheaf was signing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?