AOM
Well-Known Member
"You will never win. Still be fun though"
Very David Brent.
But can he actually cover across the back 4. He looks like a right back that has plugged a hole a couple of times. We play with wingbacks and have two on the right already. Reports from QPR says he doesn’t like sitting on the bench and he isn’t going to dislodge Dabo so it’s right to ask the question if our meagre budget is best spent here.Fuck me, some of you lot on here
'im concerned about this signing'
My god. He had a bit of verbal with a player. So fucking what. Should be more concerned that we signed a player who's had 4 games in 3 years and had 2 contracts ripped up, who is also fucking AWOL as we speak.
Hes a championship quality Defender who can cover all across the back. For free. What more do you want?
The difference is Bright was at least liked by fans and players last time.
This guy is hated by fans and players.
But can he actually cover across the back 4. He looks like a right back that has plugged a hole a couple of times. We play with wingbacks and have two on the right already. Reports from QPR says he doesn’t like sitting on the bench and he isn’t going to dislodge Dabo so it’s right to ask the question if our meagre budget is best spent here.
Also lol at all the “don’t criticise Bright, trust MR, it’s all hearsay” in the Bright thread but if he can be used as a way to shut up people with questions on another thread then fucking have at him.
What a strange response.
So because the fans find him arrogant we shouldnt sign him?
Well lets turn down proven championship defensive experience because hes got an ego. Whilst we pay someone who is nowhere to be seen, with an attitude problem and been bombed out of his last 2 clubs because some fans liked him.
Christ almighty
We have two right backs so already have injury cover there and I'd rather we signed someone who was more comfortable on the left to cover there and doesn't have a history of kicking up a stink while on the bench.Put it this way.
Would you rather have Pask and Dysrdale as first port of call with a centre half/ right back injury
Or a man whos spent 6 seasons in the championship, at decent clubs, with decent stats?
No Brainer
Your right…. PaskPut it this way.
Would you rather have Pask and Dysrdale as first port of call with a centre half/ right back injury
Or a man whos spent 6 seasons in the championship, at decent clubs, with decent stats?
No Brainer
He's not a centre back though, it's like if Dabo was being sold and fans of his new club were saying "he can fill in at CB too". Technically he can but as we've seen he's pretty ropey there.Just a quick one on the 'I don't think he'd be happy to come and sit on the bench' comments. Perhaps he won't, I'd hardly suggest any of our centre backs are undroppable if someone better came in.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Put it this way.
Would you rather have Pask and Dysrdale as first port of call with a centre half/ right back injury
Or a man whos spent 6 seasons in the championship, at decent clubs, with decent stats?
No Brainer
I thought he'd be perfectly comfortable especially on the right of the back 3 we play, although I'm hardly a Todd Kane expert. Regardless I'm ok with this signing, he'd for sure be better cover for both full backs than what we currently have knocking about the joint. As I said previously, I think a good startard utility defender is just what the squad needs.He's not a centre back though, it's like if Dabo was being sold and fans of his new club were saying "he can fill in at CB too". Technically he can but as we've seen he's pretty ropey there.
He's not a centre back though, it's like if Dabo was being sold and fans of his new club were saying "he can fill in at CB too". Technically he can but as we've seen he's pretty ropey there.
If shmmeee says we shouldn’t sign him then we should definitely sign himDon’t see this one. Need a left footer or a CB who can do the Fadz role, don’t play with fullbacks and he seems a bit of a prick.
We have two right backs so already have injury cover there and I'd rather we signed someone who was more comfortable on the left to cover there and doesn't have a history of kicking up a stink while on the bench.
Viveash, Dabo and Clarke-Salter surely would give Robins some hint of who he is as a person, maybe even Maatsen.
Dont think we would be in for him if he wasn't ok'd by them.
Seems like a strong competitor to me.
We need more of those in the squad and less L1 material. The amount of deadwood we carry is remarkable but that's what you end up with if you dont take your chances. Kane is proven top half championship material.
No more than the Rangers fans texting AFC Coventry saying avoid at all costs fans saying he is a total c**tIs that a lie?
If Kane can fill in at both RWB/LWB then that suits though. God knows where that leaves Dacosta.
Fuck me, some of you lot on here
'im concerned about this signing'
My god. He had a bit of verbal with a player. So fucking what. Should be more concerned that we signed a player who's had 4 games in 3 years and had 2 contracts ripped up, who is also fucking AWOL as we speak.
Hes a championship quality Defender who can cover all across the back. For free. What more do you want?
All of these arguments are saying we need cover across the back. I completely agree.
I don't see why we'd bring in a RB (a position we don't play) who has a history of kicking up a fuss for not playing to do that though.
I'd rather we kept Pask until January and let our scouting see if there is any talent developing who are on short contracts in the lower leagues or Scotland to sign then.
All of these arguments are saying we need cover across the back. I completely agree.
I don't see why we'd bring in a RB (a position we don't play) who has a history of kicking up a fuss for not playing to do that though.
I'd rather we kept Pask until January and let our scouting see if there is any talent developing who are on short contracts in the lower leagues or Scotland to sign then.
Nice comeback big G.He didn’t he played for one club not 3.
He had only played 20 games in 3 seasons
He cost a fairly high fee
He was replacing our best player
There is no comparison
All of these arguments are saying we need cover across the back. I completely agree.
I don't see why we'd bring in a RB (a position we don't play) who has a history of kicking up a fuss for not playing to do that though.
I'd rather we kept Pask until January and let our scouting see if there is any talent developing who are on short contracts in the lower leagues or Scotland to sign then.
Maybe DaCosta is on his way out? Loan perhaps? Just a thought.Exactly this.
For RWB we have Dabo, Dacosta, Pask, Rowe.
Obviously Dabo is absolutely miles ahead of the others and the backup isn't great. I'm sure Todd is a decent player and better than Dacosta & Pask.
But we have more depth there than we have at LWB...
Exactly this.
For RWB we have Dabo, Dacosta, Pask, Rowe.
Obviously Dabo is absolutely miles ahead of the others and the backup isn't great. I'm sure Todd is a decent player and better than Dacosta & Pask.
But we have more depth there than we have at LWB...
I can only assume Dacosta is being moved on and in any case is just a walking accident, Pask often looked completely lost at RWB, and it's too early for Rowe to bring him into the fold.
We don't have depth there at all.
Robins was considering signing Martin Cranie who plays anywhere along the back line who is 34/35, Todd Kane by all accounts does the same job and around 8 years younger. I wouldn’t assume either if he signs he is just for the bench Robins has played two out of our four league games with Dabo playing inside the right wing/back.
It will be horses for course.
Kyle played for Sunderland, Wolves, Cov in the championship did he not?He didn’t he played for one club not 3.
He had only played 20 games in 3 seasons
He cost a fairly high fee
He was replacing our best player
There is no comparison
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?