clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Who?
5 or 6 teams are averaging better than that
It also says we’ve had some of the hardest fixtures.No idea what this is.....but we aren't top!!
WLDLDWW
What’s that? 11 points?
Looks like a Welsh village to me!WLDLDWW
What’s that? 11 points?
Be careful or i’ll cry to the mods like a certain teacher who’s always rigjt"Frank lampard will be a disaster mark my words"
Optimist?
Every team has a purple patch then trail off (see QPR).5 or 6 teams are averaging better than that
That's basically Philosorators graph in tabular form, talking of him,where is he,miss those graph's, hope he's alright.No idea what this is.....but we aren't top!!
I look at that gap too.
Over the season so far, Ipswich, Birmingham, Blackburn, Southampton and Watford. Obviously we don’t need to worry about some of those specific teams but it’s far from title winning performance.Who?
our expected stats have dipped quite sharply, I posted a graph the other day.
Since Sheff Weds we've only averaged around +0.2 xGD per game, previously it was over 1.
What’s that sourced from?The second best xGD per game in the Championship last season was Burnley on +0.38 behind Leeds with +0.88.
The recent tail off coincides with Rudoni being missing and also Torp being in and out of the team a bit. While I don't think it was ever going to be likely to go through a season with >+1xGD per game I am hopeful that it'll improve back towards where it was.
What’s that sourced from?
Fbref has Leeds on +1.30 and Burnley +0.41
xGD is by no means a perfect metric but I think it’s a decent indicator. Yes, I put it down to Rudoni being out, but he might not be fully fit for a while and it’s worrying that 1 player has that big of an impact.
Shit comeback babeBe careful or i’ll cry to the mods like a certain teacher who’s always rigjt
What’s that sourced from?
Fbref has Leeds on +1.30 and Burnley +0.41
xGD is by no means a perfect metric but I think it’s a decent indicator. Yes, I put it down to Rudoni being out, but he might not be fully fit for a while and it’s worrying that 1 player has that big of an impact.
I mean I’m not saying it’s a crisis, just I think performances need to improve a bit from our recent level. I’m confident they will once Rudoni is starting again but that could take a while, ideally we’d find another way of achieving it without him.FootyStats
I don't think it's all Rudoni, but like I said, I don't think the early season sample was necessarily likely to continue all season even if Rudoni had stayed fit. The automatically promoted teams are usually around the x0.50 level if even that high. Leeds' performance last year was an outlier.
Just a couple of day's according to Grimes'y.are they getting a week off?
AgreedI mean I’m not saying it’s a crisis, just I think performances need to improve a bit from our recent level. I’m confident they will once Rudoni is starting again but that could take a while, ideally we’d find another way of achieving it without him.
Ipswich got that big squad consistency.
We're currently more consistent than them though.
They're 2nd to us in the last 10 form table but drop to 9th in the last 6 table.
Obviously the big squad could be a factor as the season progresses.
? They’re top two in 5/10/15 according to that table?
That table is xG ratio not form? They’re top two in 5/10/15 according to that table?
That table is xG ratio not form
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?