Read it again you thick prickWhat the fuck are you rattling on about
Paid your charity bet yet Rupert?Read it again you thick prick
You know more than you do our players.There are a number of scenerios now, first this question to this European Commission might have been asked a few weeks ago when the appeal was thrown out, also is it a continuation of the legals, at the moment it looks just a question. Then there’s the time scale for an answer. If the answer is positive in sisu favour who could be in the dock, the local government, our courts, then what ? And then there’s Brexit, should we leave EU what clout would any commission have then ?
On a ccfc basis I don’t believe for one minute our c.e.o. or chairman know nothing about it but in fairness haven’t said anything yet, will be interesting when they do comment after all at the end of the day Boddy in particular has a job to look after.
No all it was that a complaint was made, they can then investigate this if they feel it’s necessaryI missed the first part of the interview on the radio. Was it confirmed that SISU have requested an investigation? Nor did I hear any mention of timescales.
Fuck off Uncle TomYou know more than you do our players.
How to make a complaint at EU level
If they go this route and the EU Commission rejects their complaint then they can complain to the European Ombudsman.
In all seriousness though, if they've decided to go for this they can only complain about an "authority or body" not a private company or person, these have to be dealt with in UK courts. This means that they could only be complaining about the UK courts or the council. In no way can this involve the franchise at all so it shouldn't be a barrier to their demands, if they do kick the club out because of this it will only be due to them protecting the council.
Interview didn’t really clear anything up at all, Gilbert spouting his usual bullshit all night we just need to wait and see what comments the main parties make today hopefully
How about you pay up your bet or fuck off? I'm sure there's another way you can pretend you know about ccfc and get shown up elsewhere.Fuck off Uncle Tom
Are you sure you really mean that and know the connotations?Fuck off Uncle Tom
Fuck knows, all I know is that Gilbert is a liarwas that the interview with the 'expert' on CWR you're referring to Dom?
Assuming he fits the pattern of being an older bloke who thinks others are stupid and don't have him figured out. I very much doubt he does.Are you sure you really mean that and know the connotations?
Bloke on CWR from the council saying that SISU need to get ‘back’ round the negotiating table and sort a deal for playing at the Ricoh instead of pursuing legal stuff.
Is he hinting that the talks have broken down or does he not know we are already in ‘negotiations’?
If I remember correctly, sisu claimed in one of their open letters that the previous ‘legals’ did not directly involve wasps.Gilbert has said it doesn't change wasps stance as it's still legals about the ricoh. Wasn't the wasps stance about wasps being involved?
It suddenly becomes strange if it doesn't involve wasps but they still refuse to talk.
It just seems a bit strange
whatWhat’s it got to do with Wasps?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry I can’t recall his name, but it wasn’t one I was familiar with.Who is it?
Fuck off Uncle Tom
If I remember correctly, sisu claimed in one of their open letters that the previous ‘legals’ did not directly involve wasps.
I'm guessing that they don't want to be in a position where a court finds that they have to pay back £20 million quid (or whatever) back to the public purse because of a case brought by their tenant. I can see their point - it doesn't make for a cordial tenant-landlord relationship, does it?So why are Wasps so adamant there can be no talks while there are on-going legals? Even if they are involved then trying to prevent the legal process means something is seriously amiss.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nick and Magwitch - please can you take your petty squabble elsewhere and stop littering every interesting thread with it?
They’ve never quite clarified what that means though have they. Do they want no legal action of any kind or do they just not want to be involved in any. Part of these negotiations could be that they’ve let sisu go after the council if they’re left out of it.So why are Wasps so adamant there can be no talks while there are on-going legals? Even if they are involved then trying to prevent the legal process means something is seriously amiss.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm guessing that they don't want to be in a position where a court finds that they have to pay back £20 million quid (or whatever) back to the public purse because of a case brought by their tenant. I can see their point - it doesn't make for a cordial tenant-landlord relationship, does it?
I'm guessing that they don't want to be in a position where a court finds that they have to pay back £20 million quid (or whatever) back to the public purse because of a case brought by their tenant. I can see their point - it doesn't make for a cordial tenant-landlord relationship, does it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?