But they can afford to alienate 8000+ fans and the entrance fees they would have paid to come and watch the team they once supported........? Can't afford the rent....? Can't afford not to, surely? It's just bollocks, and you know it!
Again, you are missing the point. CCFC could not afford the rent. Do you not get that distinction? Or are you saying it is the duty of the owners of a football club to continually subsidise it and not wish for it to become self-sufficient and self-financing?
Grenduffy....It means he couldn't be arsed to look at any facts - he'd prefer to talk out of his arse.............................................>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Says the man who bases facts on "Estimates" lmfao.
But they can afford to alienate 8000+ fans and the entrance fees they would have paid to come and watch the team they once supported........? Can't afford the rent....? Can't afford not to, surely? It's just bollocks, and you know it!
But they have never answered as to why they just didn't stay at the Ricoh until this mythical new ground is built?
The fundementals are the club is over £2m a year worse off than had it stayed at the Ricoh.
Grenduffy....The estimated facts quote is so old it's going to soon be appearing on the antiques road show. I don't actually believe I said it in the context you use anyway.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Eeerrrrrr your a lying twat mate you meant it EXACTLY in the context. Claiming a website you use claim undisclosed fees to be a FACT!
I could point out that SISU had negotiated a deal to buy 50% of ACL last year - agreed (in writing) by all parties, only for the council to walk away. But then, I have pointed this out many times and it falls on deaf ears. Not sure how you reconcile that fact with the "couldn't be arsed" statement.
theferret........I could point out that SISU had negotiated a deal to buy 50% of ACL last year - agreed (in writing) by all parties, only for the council to walk away......................................................................................Put up a link please.
But it was SISU that walked away as they wanted the whole thing for much less. We would have known every bit of detail from Timothy if it was ACL that walked away......and a good chance of another court battle.
Uh? This has been mentioned continuously by TF, it was the point when everything broke down. Are people still unaware of this?
It's like Groundhog Day in here.
Lmfao......Says Fisher with not one Iota of proof put forward! All this declared by Fisher who is well known to...how can I say this?....bend the truth or even.......Lie through his fecking teeth!!!.... FFS anyone putting up anything remotely like you have just done would be "Shouted down" and called an "ACL lover" Get a grip for fecks sake!!!
Tell you what Grenduffy YOU put up a link to show me that you didn't use it in the context I use?
So what Timothy considers to have been a good offer must have been a good offer?
I was on about the offer made to take over the Higgs share. They only wanted their money back. SISU walked away from that. Wanted the whole thing for not much more.....hence the judicial review and then challenging it because the judge saw right through what they were doing.
Well, I must have been living on another planet for some time as I certainly do not recall such a statement. You say that it was in a CET interview. Send me a link.
Well, I must have been living on another planet for some time as I certainly do not recall such a statement. You say that it was in a CET interview. Send me a link.
Oh FFS http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...ews/coventry-city-chief-executive-tim-4010343
Question 9 I think. Given that this interview prompted a 1000 page thread on here, I'm amazed at how so many seem oblivious to its existence. The extent to which some people are willing to go to absolve the council of any blame is staggering.
@ theferret........http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/exclusive-sisu-strikes-coventry-city-3019922>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This is a legitimate link!!! and we all know who reneged on this don't we eh?
Are you questioning the legitimacy of my CT link now? At least mine is clickable.
If it doesn't fit with the general consensus on here it gets roundly ignored. You know that ferret, and don't pretend otherwise.
and post 54.. ?
...is completely irrelevant.
...is completely irrelevant.
Tim Fisher.....a source of honesty and integrity???????/Oh FFS http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...ews/coventry-city-chief-executive-tim-4010343
Question 9 I think. Given that this interview prompted a 1000 page thread on here, I'm amazed at how so many seem oblivious to its existence. The extent to which some people are willing to go to absolve the council of any blame is staggering.
...is completely irrelevant.
I was about to say this. It's a valid link with valid information, but has nothing to do with the point at hand. Might as well post a link to the villa website.
So in conclusion, post 54: 4/10.
Tim Fisher.....a source of honesty and integrity???????/
In your opinion.. this thread is about PR?..PR is about hearts and minds is it not....public relations.. for me this was SISUs number 1 PR faux pas... up until then most moderates like me(as was) had more than a degree of empathy with the 'must reduce the rent argument'.....but then this.. ILLEGAL ACT.... if that doesnt self defeat a PR battle, nowt will?
Lets not forget
In what way?
Shows why SISU walked away from the Higgs share.....unless you are saying the judge is part of the conspiracy trying to prove that the council are free of all blame :thinking about:
Point taken, fully legitimate link within the context of the thread as a whole.
I'll up it to a 9/10.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?