fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
I've no time for the Trust since they embraced Wasps. Lost any credibility they had then.
"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"I've no time for the Trust since they embraced Wasps. Lost any credibility they had then.
It makes good business sense.Any one who is pro London Wasps needs to take a good look at themselves, why support a franchised club? Do you also think MK Dons being moved from Wimbledon was okay?
It makes good business sense.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
He was being sarcasticFuck that, how about have some morals? MK Dons are repugnant and so are London Wasps. Also good business sense for Wasps? Have you seen their finances? The play to mostly half empty stadium even though they give out free tickets like sweets.
Fuck them
Time to bring the sarcasm emoji back nick
Or peoe need to be better at itTime to bring the sarcasm emoji back nick
Morals you should have added Sisu to that.Fuck that, how about have some morals? MK Dons are repugnant and so are London Wasps. Also good business sense for Wasps? Have you seen their finances? The play to mostly half empty stadium even though they give out free tickets like sweets.
Fuck them
But to sanctify wasps is a tad hypocriticalMorals you should have added Sisu to that.
Like peas in a pod
But to sanctify wasps is a tad hypocritical
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Surely SISU can fix the problem by stopping litigation.
Whatever you think of Wasps isn't that the best step in the short term to ensure the club can fulfil next season's fixtures.
It is then up to Wasps to be reasonable and provide an affordable deal.
But to sanctify wasps is a tad hypocritical
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Not quite really imo. Wasps' owners knew when they had got the best deal they felt they could - & ended up with the stadium. Ours arrogantly tried for more conditions, & made the decision to sell to Wasps at least a tad easier.Funny how hypocritcal many are on here - hate SISU, admire Wasps. As has been pointed out, "two peas in a pod".
LaughableNot quite really imo. Wasps' owners knew when they had got the best deal they felt they could - & ended up with the stadium. Ours arrogantly tried for more conditions, & made the decision to sell to Wasps at least a tad easier.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Not sure "laughable" was used to describe it by anyone at the time...but Wasps have enjoyed the laugh more than us so far - & call the shots, that is for sure.Laughable
Not to single you out as its certainly not only you but this is what I don't get from our fans. We've been out of the city once. Surely it's something that everyone wants to desperately avoid and we all know the only option is the Ricoh.
It should be clear to Wasps that the city won't accept them forcing the club out but you've got our fans already making excuses for them.
I couldn't care less about SISU, Fisher, Sepalla, the council, ACL, Wasps or anyone else. I care about Coventry City and the club having a long and successful future in Coventry. Why does that seem a difficult concept for many of our supporters?
The same deal that Fisher said they wouldn't have paid as much as Wasps?Can you imagine if the SISU were offered, publicly, the same deal as Wasps, and then refused to take it. The internet would melt and taking the club out of the town again would see an even worse result than Northampton.
That is like saying renting a 4 bed house for £500 a month isn't reasonable because you have to pay gas, electric and council tax.There are also matchday fees (rightly) to cover costs for putting on games. It isn't just a flat 100k
No, it's like saying it doesn't cost just 500 a month to live there.That is like saying renting a 4 bed house for £500 a month isn't reasonable because you have to pay gas, electric and council tax.
The ROI, cost of maitaining all has to be factored in too don't forget.No, it's like saying it doesn't cost just 500 a month to live there.
Yeah so they put a service charge (matchday fees) to cover it.The ROI, cost of maitaining all has to be factored in too don't forget.
I'd hazzard the cost of mortgage & maitaining said exame property would be much more than £500/month
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Yeah so they put a service charge (matchday fees) to cover it.
The issue is how people show up to push how generous wasps are and how its low rent and they are doing us a favour.What’s your issue exactly? Is it that a third party is making a profit from us?
Surely the cost is the cost and we have to deal with that as a business or look elsewhere.
If I was a Wasps fan I could understand having an opinion, but why would they care what CCFC fans think? Surely from CCFCs POV it’s take it or leave it, nothing else matters. It’s all just crying over spilt milk.
Not surprised. How much will the leccy bill be during winter?Yeah so they put a service charge (matchday fees) to cover it.
Yeah so they put a service charge (matchday fees) to cover it.
No idea, judging by past seasons it won't be on keeping the pitch nice.Not surprised. How much will the leccy bill be during winter?
All clubs pay money for such things, hiring ground staff, providing power and light and maintaining the pitch is not free.
If you can you provide comparative figures that show the charges CCFC pay are extortionate compared to other similar clubs then I'll be happy to agree you have a good point,
Not surprised. How much will the leccy bill be during winter?
Not quite really imo. Wasps' owners knew when they had got the best deal they felt they could - & ended up with the stadium. Ours arrogantly tried for more conditions, & made the decision to sell to Wasps at least a tad easier.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?