Sunderland at it still......! (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

lucky19672

New Member
Last edited:

skybluehugh

New Member
Will this lot ever give up

Having a go at Keys

http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=665162


Hiring a plane for gods sake!






http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=664589


500+ posts

http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=630766

Interestingly enough, one of their former chairmen has croaked today, that'll teach them to wish ill on others.

http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=665077



Who gives a crap. We have bigger fish to fry than worry about a bunch of northan twats (not all northaners, just the twats)
 
C

chinnychebbend

Guest
why do they hate us??

It's simple.

With two out of the three relegation places already decided, in the battle to avoid the other spot Sunderland were one point above both Coventry and Bristol cities, with an inferior goal difference, prior to the final game of the season being played. Sunderland were away at a strong Everton side and the other two were playing each other.

It was in the days of two points for a win so the maths were simple. If Sunderland drew or won they were safe. If they lost, but there was a positive result one way or the other in the other game, they were safe. If they lost, though, and the other two sides drew, Sunderland would go down.

The final games were arranged for the Thursday before the FA Cup Final, both with a 7.30pm kick-off, to avoid the possibility of sides having the advantage of knowing exactly what they had to do before their game finished.

Despite the crowd at Highfield Road being slightly lower than Goodison Park, with similar away followings at both venues, and clubs knowing what a high profile finale the evening was prior to it, Coventry delayed their kick-off, citing 'crowd congestion'.

Sunderland went behind early on, but Coventry had also taken the lead in their game too. As time went on, though, Sunderland went forward looking for an equaliser, and were caught on the break in injury time as well.

Things had changed at Highfield Road, too. Coventry, having looked comfortable earlier, had been pegged back to 2-2, with the visitors looking as if they could well get a winner in the time they had left.

These were in the days way before Sky, or even live club football on tv. Even football on the radio was resticted to a Saturday afternoon and midweek European or cup games. Getting information from one ground to another was difficult.

Jimmy Hill, however, ensured the information was at hand to him at all times, and with Bristol City piling forward for the winner, ordered that the Sunderland result be shown on the scoreboard.

The result was farcical, with both sides now knowing they were safe if the score remained the same. Estimates of the time play vary between 7 and 15 minutes but the inescapable truth is that a blood-and-thunder match had been turned into a training session warm-down, by a mixture of the delayed kick off and scoreboard. Bristol City defenders kicked the ball back and forth between them and their keeper without a single Coventry player going anywhere near them.

The result was Sunderland going down on the back of someone deliberately ensuring a match was concluded without it being finished competitively.

Coventry City were subsequently charged with influencing the outcome of a game by erroneous or foul means, for which they were found guilty. They were punished with a warning as to their future conduct. No points deduction, no match replaying, just a warning. Sitting on the committee that decided the punishment was a certain Mr. J. Hill.

That's with the "coventry/bristol hatred". It's more a Jimmy Hill hatred. Coventry going down to what is the Third Division in old man's terms hurts Jimmy Hill, putting them back where they were before his corrupt involvement with the club began.


 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Sick bastards do they realise people have died in the cruise ship disaster, hardly comparable to getting relegated because their team weren't good enough to amass the required points.

"I would love to see Coventry up shit creak! That Italian cruise ship captain has more morals than some of the people linked with that cesspit of a football club!"
 

lucky19672

New Member
Sick bastards do they realise people have died in the cruise ship disaster, hardly comparable to getting relegated because their team weren't good enough to amass the required points.

"I would love to see Coventry up shit creak! That Italian cruise ship captain has more morals than some of the people linked with that cesspit of a football club!"

Disgraceful that mind.
 

lucky19672

New Member
It's simple.

With two out of the three relegation places already decided, in the battle to avoid the other spot Sunderland were one point above both Coventry and Bristol cities, with an inferior goal difference, prior to the final game of the season being played. Sunderland were away at a strong Everton side and the other two were playing each other.

It was in the days of two points for a win so the maths were simple. If Sunderland drew or won they were safe. If they lost, but there was a positive result one way or the other in the other game, they were safe. If they lost, though, and the other two sides drew, Sunderland would go down.

The final games were arranged for the Thursday before the FA Cup Final, both with a 7.30pm kick-off, to avoid the possibility of sides having the advantage of knowing exactly what they had to do before their game finished.

Despite the crowd at Highfield Road being slightly lower than Goodison Park, with similar away followings at both venues, and clubs knowing what a high profile finale the evening was prior to it, Coventry delayed their kick-off, citing 'crowd congestion'.

Sunderland went behind early on, but Coventry had also taken the lead in their game too. As time went on, though, Sunderland went forward looking for an equaliser, and were caught on the break in injury time as well.

Things had changed at Highfield Road, too. Coventry, having looked comfortable earlier, had been pegged back to 2-2, with the visitors looking as if they could well get a winner in the time they had left.

These were in the days way before Sky, or even live club football on tv. Even football on the radio was resticted to a Saturday afternoon and midweek European or cup games. Getting information from one ground to another was difficult.

Jimmy Hill, however, ensured the information was at hand to him at all times, and with Bristol City piling forward for the winner, ordered that the Sunderland result be shown on the scoreboard.

The result was farcical, with both sides now knowing they were safe if the score remained the same. Estimates of the time play vary between 7 and 15 minutes but the inescapable truth is that a blood-and-thunder match had been turned into a training session warm-down, by a mixture of the delayed kick off and scoreboard. Bristol City defenders kicked the ball back and forth between them and their keeper without a single Coventry player going anywhere near them.

The result was Sunderland going down on the back of someone deliberately ensuring a match was concluded without it being finished competitively.

Coventry City were subsequently charged with influencing the outcome of a game by erroneous or foul means, for which they were found guilty. They were punished with a warning as to their future conduct. No points deduction, no match replaying, just a warning. Sitting on the committee that decided the punishment was a certain Mr. J. Hill.

That's with the "coventry/bristol hatred". It's more a Jimmy Hill hatred. Coventry going down to what is the Third Division in old man's terms hurts Jimmy Hill, putting them back where they were before his corrupt involvement with the club began.




An investigation was done and we were warned over our future conduct. Get over it Geordie wanabee.
 

CCFC123

New Member
its fucking boring now.... you lot need to stop biting as well ! most sunderland supporters would be embarrased by there tripe spouted. Any half brained sunderland fan would know we didn't do anything wrong. The ones spoting shit dont have any real idea what happened that day so fuck um.

Ignore them now and the kids will go away.
 

JazzCat

New Member
To be fair I can see why they hold a grudge. We were found guilty of cheating. It's easy to say get over it it was 35 years ago but would we have let it drop had it been the other way round? Probably not.

That said a lot of those posting that they should never forget, are in another thread saying people from Liverpool should get over Hillsborough. Bit Hypocritical if you ask me.

They can hold a grudge against Jimmy Hill if they like and revel in our misfortune if it makes them happy. I for one don't really care nor get offended by it. I have no feelings about Sunderland or their fans so it's irrelevate to me.
 

PhilWasn'tBabb

New Member
It's simple.

With two out of the three relegation places already decided, in the battle to avoid the other spot Sunderland were one point above both Coventry and Bristol cities, with an inferior goal difference, prior to the final game of the season being played. Sunderland were away at a strong Everton side and the other two were playing each other.

It was in the days of two points for a win so the maths were simple. If Sunderland drew or won they were safe. If they lost, but there was a positive result one way or the other in the other game, they were safe. If they lost, though, and the other two sides drew, Sunderland would go down.

The final games were arranged for the Thursday before the FA Cup Final, both with a 7.30pm kick-off, to avoid the possibility of sides having the advantage of knowing exactly what they had to do before their game finished.

Despite the crowd at Highfield Road being slightly lower than Goodison Park, with similar away followings at both venues, and clubs knowing what a high profile finale the evening was prior to it, Coventry delayed their kick-off, citing 'crowd congestion'.

Sunderland went behind early on, but Coventry had also taken the lead in their game too. As time went on, though, Sunderland went forward looking for an equaliser, and were caught on the break in injury time as well.

Things had changed at Highfield Road, too. Coventry, having looked comfortable earlier, had been pegged back to 2-2, with the visitors looking as if they could well get a winner in the time they had left.

These were in the days way before Sky, or even live club football on tv. Even football on the radio was resticted to a Saturday afternoon and midweek European or cup games. Getting information from one ground to another was difficult.

Jimmy Hill, however, ensured the information was at hand to him at all times, and with Bristol City piling forward for the winner, ordered that the Sunderland result be shown on the scoreboard.

The result was farcical, with both sides now knowing they were safe if the score remained the same. Estimates of the time play vary between 7 and 15 minutes but the inescapable truth is that a blood-and-thunder match had been turned into a training session warm-down, by a mixture of the delayed kick off and scoreboard. Bristol City defenders kicked the ball back and forth between them and their keeper without a single Coventry player going anywhere near them.

The result was Sunderland going down on the back of someone deliberately ensuring a match was concluded without it being finished competitively.

Coventry City were subsequently charged with influencing the outcome of a game by erroneous or foul means, for which they were found guilty. They were punished with a warning as to their future conduct. No points deduction, no match replaying, just a warning. Sitting on the committee that decided the punishment was a certain Mr. J. Hill.

That's with the "coventry/bristol hatred". It's more a Jimmy Hill hatred. Coventry going down to what is the Third Division in old man's terms hurts Jimmy Hill, putting them back where they were before his corrupt involvement with the club began.



You make a compelling case, all be it somewhat embellished for your own dramatic effect via your red and white tinted specs. You have something of a reason for having a bit of a chip on your shoulder, But honestly... it was a long time ago and had you won your game it wouldn't have mattered.

We don't even manage to get this much animosity from the like of Leicester and Villa.
 
Last edited:

CCFC123

New Member
It's simple.

With two out of the three relegation places already decided, in the battle to avoid the other spot Sunderland were one point above both Coventry and Bristol cities, with an inferior goal difference, prior to the final game of the season being played. Sunderland were away at a strong Everton side and the other two were playing each other.

It was in the days of two points for a win so the maths were simple. If Sunderland drew or won they were safe. If they lost, but there was a positive result one way or the other in the other game, they were safe. If they lost, though, and the other two sides drew, Sunderland would go down.

The final games were arranged for the Thursday before the FA Cup Final, both with a 7.30pm kick-off, to avoid the possibility of sides having the advantage of knowing exactly what they had to do before their game finished.

Despite the crowd at Highfield Road being slightly lower than Goodison Park, with similar away followings at both venues, and clubs knowing what a high profile finale the evening was prior to it, Coventry delayed their kick-off, citing 'crowd congestion'.

Sunderland went behind early on, but Coventry had also taken the lead in their game too. As time went on, though, Sunderland went forward looking for an equaliser, and were caught on the break in injury time as well.

Things had changed at Highfield Road, too. Coventry, having looked comfortable earlier, had been pegged back to 2-2, with the visitors looking as if they could well get a winner in the time they had left.

These were in the days way before Sky, or even live club football on tv. Even football on the radio was resticted to a Saturday afternoon and midweek European or cup games. Getting information from one ground to another was difficult.

Jimmy Hill, however, ensured the information was at hand to him at all times, and with Bristol City piling forward for the winner, ordered that the Sunderland result be shown on the scoreboard.

The result was farcical, with both sides now knowing they were safe if the score remained the same. Estimates of the time play vary between 7 and 15 minutes but the inescapable truth is that a blood-and-thunder match had been turned into a training session warm-down, by a mixture of the delayed kick off and scoreboard. Bristol City defenders kicked the ball back and forth between them and their keeper without a single Coventry player going anywhere near them.

The result was Sunderland going down on the back of someone deliberately ensuring a match was concluded without it being finished competitively.

Coventry City were subsequently charged with influencing the outcome of a game by erroneous or foul means, for which they were found guilty. They were punished with a warning as to their future conduct. No points deduction, no match replaying, just a warning. Sitting on the committee that decided the punishment was a certain Mr. J. Hill.

That's with the "coventry/bristol hatred". It's more a Jimmy Hill hatred. Coventry going down to what is the Third Division in old man's terms hurts Jimmy Hill, putting them back where they were before his corrupt involvement with the club began.


Sorry i've bit now. This is utter tripe also, why the fuck didn't you win your game and nobody would going on 35 years later ! Need to look closer to home for your failures my son.

Enough.
 

lucky19672

New Member
Sorry i've bit now. This is utter tripe also, why the fuck didn't you win your game and nobody would going on 35 years later ! Need to look closer to home for your failures my son.

Enough.

Well said, I spent too many years living amongst that lot and you'd be surprised how many of their supporters despise CCFC, not quite to the extent of their bigger neighbours, but not far off.
 
C

chinnychebbend

Guest
You make a compelling case, all be it somewhat embellished for your own dramatic effect via your red and white tinted specs. You have something of a reason for having a bit of a chip on your shoulder, But honestly... it was a long time ago and had you won your game it wouldn't have mattered.

We don't even manage to get this much animosity from the like of Leicester and Villa.

your club was a fucking disgrace that day, you made trevor chappell look like fucking sportsman of the year. the fact is you cheated in the most spineless way possible and the chickens are coming home to roost, i for one will not be losing any sleep over your current plight.

Enjoy life in obscurity you spineless cheating bellends!
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
What's with the 'crowd congestion' as if that was just a ruse or something.

It was crowd congestion. Didn't need to cite it. The game was delayed on police instruction as there were still so many people outside trying to get into the ground.

What you say is bollocks because the fact is word did get to the ground and had Hill not put it up on the scoreboard the bench would have simply relayed the info to the players on the pitch as managers haev always done. If they know a score which has implications on their team in a positive manner they relay the info. Always have done always will.

There is no conspiracy. The none competitiveness was something I wasn't happy with for sure, but it was both sides and both sides were desperate not to lose. Think every team would have done exactly the same thing. It wasn't in the spirit of the game but was not cheating.

Think you will also find shirt pulling, diving and feigning injury are also not in the spirit of the game.

Need to check the fact about us being found guilty. My recollection was that we were found not guilty.
 
Last edited:
C

chinnychebbend

Guest
Sorry i've bit now. This is utter tripe also, why the fuck didn't you win your game and nobody would going on 35 years later ! Need to look closer to home for your failures my son.

Enough.

I'm sure chinny would have flashed the score up if you were 3 up and cruising, would he shite the spineless twat!
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
I'm sure chinny would have flashed the score up if you were 3 up and cruising, would he shite the spineless twat!


So you saying your club wouldn't have done exactly the same thing? You telling me that if Sunderland needed a result to go in their favour and that had happened while your game was still going on and you were still playing, the coaching staff wouldn't have relayed the info to the players?

Cos if you are saying that that would be a total and complete and utter lie and you would be utterly deluded.
 
C

chinnychebbend

Guest
So you saying your club wouldn't have done exactly the same thing? You telling me that if Sunderland needed a result to go in their favour and that had happened while your game was still going on and you were still playing, the coaching staff wouldn't have relayed the info to the players?

Cos if you are saying that you a a total and complete and utter liar and utterly deluded.

I couldn't answer that because we kicked off at the correct time. however If we did i expect the outcome of the investigation would have been slightly different considering who was on the panel.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
What's more puzzling is that they have a grudge against us for the late kick off in '97 against Spurs-when the only result that would keep us up was a win. Idiots.
 

lucky19672

New Member
So you saying your club wouldn't have done exactly the same thing? You telling me that if Sunderland needed a result to go in their favour and that had happened while your game was still going on and you were still playing, the coaching staff wouldn't have relayed the info to the players?

Cos if you are saying that that would be a total and complete and utter lie and you would be utterly deluded.


You tell him Otis lad, delusional the lot of them!
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I couldn't answer that because we kicked off at the correct time. however If we did i expect the outcome of the investigation would have been slightly different considering who was on the panel.

While you're at it, CCFC is also responsible for 9/11, world hunger, the Eurozone crisis, and climate change-all orchestrated by criminal mastermind JH. What a nasty bunch we all are ;)
 

Zanetti

New Member
its fucking boring now.... you lot need to stop biting as well ! most sunderland supporters would be embarrased by there tripe spouted. Any half brained sunderland fan would know we didn't do anything wrong. The ones spoting shit dont have any real idea what happened that day so fuck um.

Ignore them now and the kids will go away.

I simply do not believe this to be true - I think that at the very least a significant minority of sunderland supporters feel this way. This is suggested by their reaction to Jimmy Hill's appearance on the pitch at Fulham v Sunderland in 2008: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvbXRyH4hek

It seems that the majority of Sunderland fans are that bitter and stupid.
 

Delboycov

Active Member
What's with the 'crowd congestion' as if that was just a ruse or something.

It was crowd congestion. Didn't need to cite it. The game was delayed on police instruction as there were still so many people outside trying to get into the ground.

What you say is bollocks because the fact is word did get to the ground and had Hill not put it up on the scoreboard the bench would have simply relayed the info to the players on the pitch as managers haev always done. If they know a score which has implications on their team in a positive manner they relay the info. Always have done always will.

There is no conspiracy. The none competitiveness was something I wasn't happy with for sure, but it was both sides and both sides were desperate not to lose. Think every team would have done exactly the same thing. It wasn't in the spirit of the game but was not cheating.

Think you will also find shirt pulling, diving and feigning injury are also not in the spirit of the game.

Need to check the fact about us being found guilty. My recollection was that we were found not guilty.

Maybe it's the mind playing tricks Otis but I thought we were found not guilty too. I think you're absolutely right about it not being in the spirit of the game and l can understand their bitterness to some extent although if any of them said they wouldn't want their team to have done the same in that situation then they would be lying. Don't remember there being so much joyous anticipation from wearyside when we went down from the premier though...what's rekindled the sudden interest?
 

CovFan

Well-Known Member
Maybe it's the mind playing tricks Otis but I thought we were found not guilty too. I think you're absolutely right about it not being in the spirit of the game and l can understand their bitterness to some extent although if any of them said they wouldn't want their team to have done the same in that situation then they would be lying. Don't remember there being so much joyous anticipation from wearyside when we went down from the premier though...what's rekindled the sudden interest?

Probably that Newcastle are doing so well so they need to find a team that has wronged them in the past to feel superior to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top