Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
If McG goes to Barnsley, I really hope they go down, Cranie and McG to over take? Too good to be true.
i love how, following a random rumour on a forest site, we're now deciding how to fit both DMC and CLarke into the team! This is why i love forums...
I still think it won't be headache Robins ever has, and that we'll continue with 1 up top - Clarke - because DMC will be at Barnsley or somewhere.
Although obviously i hope i'm wrong
I find it difficult to believe that Forest have an asset that needs to be sold this month or go for a free at the end of the season would be allowed to go back out on loan? Surely they will be looking to keep him or flog him. A loan seems a peculiar option.
as was the defending and midfield closing down.I don't think Shrewsbury were hard to break down at all, just our finishing was absolutely woeful!
But not if there are no offers for him? They do not want him around the side, hence the sale or return. Barnsley are they only side to show concrete interest in him, i doubt he will go there IMO
And it don't work.
as others have noted once clarke was on we still could have scored 3 goals
im not gonna giv eup on it after 30 mins thats for sure
forest forums indicate that same source who told them they would sign DMC from southampton has now told them that cov will get him back on loan. perhaps he knows david or his agent?
lets hope!
I'm not sure what the answer is, but I would like to see us play 2 up at home. 442 doesn't particular work well for us, we lose the battle in midfield and don't have orthodox wide men or decent box to box midfielder either to make it work.
Talk about clutching at straws! A friend of a bloke down the pub knows his best friends pal 3rd hand!
In other words - a totally unfounded unsubstantiated rumour!!!
Is this a genuine post or your attempt at a joke? His contract runs out at end of season - Forest will not let his contract run out, so will sell him in this transfer window.
Theres no ifs buts or maybes about it! Not a chance in hell SiSU are going to meet his wage demands, and why should he take a reduction in wages - his value is about as high as it will ever get.
Never ceases to amaze me how deluded some people can be at times. Doesn't the fact that a deal was done so quickly with bailey show that if a deal was going to be done, it would ALREADY have been done!
McGoldrick has gone, I don't like the fact he has gone, he has been the best player cov have had for a long time, but his stock is sky high at the moment. A footballer's career is quite short, so he has to get the best financial deal he can (that is why they hire Agents!)
If he was going to stay, there would have been a pre-signing agreement months ago.
His goals will be desperately missed.
The only realistic alternative is the diamond. I still like it, and I think AT made it fail, not the actual system itself (systems are always an easy target, but not always the main fault). But the current system works well so why fix it?
Talk about clutching at straws! A friend of a bloke down the pub knows his best friends pal 3rd hand!
In other words - a totally unfounded unsubstantiated rumour!!!
Is this a genuine post or your attempt at a joke? His contract runs out at end of season - Forest will not let his contract run out, so will sell him in this transfer window.
Theres no ifs buts or maybes about it! Not a chance in hell SiSU are going to meet his wage demands, and why should he take a reduction in wages - his value is about as high as it will ever get.
Never ceases to amaze me how deluded some people can be at times. Doesn't the fact that a deal was done so quickly with bailey show that if a deal was going to be done, it would ALREADY have been done!
McGoldrick has gone, I don't like the fact he has gone, he has been the best player cov have had for a long time, but his stock is sky high at the moment. A footballer's career is quite short, so he has to get the best financial deal he can (that is why they hire Agents!)
If he was going to stay, there would have been a pre-signing agreement months ago.
His goals will be desperately missed.
Talk about clutching at straws!
.
Surely Moussa fits that bill ,Jennings and Bailey on occassion but admittedly rarely.I'm not sure what the answer is, but I would like to see us play 2 up at home. 442 doesn't particular work well for us, we lose the battle in midfield and don't have orthodox wide men or decent box to box midfielder either to make it work.
Surely Moussa fits that bill ,Jennings and Bailey on occassion but admittedly rarely.
your troll gimmick is getting old
this thread is clearly based on a RUMOUR,noone has stated anything as fact
p.s you dumb fuck
Doesn't the fact that a deal was done so quickly with bailey show that if a deal was going to be done, it would ALREADY have been done!
Don't always agree with your views/opinions, but that made me spit out my coffee...quality put down for the WUM that is psgm1 :claping hands:
some/most are complete bollox lolwhy dont you always agree with my views/opinions?
some/most are complete bollox lol
Thats what concerns me about Moussa as well !
Goldie has been offered a 3 Yr contract worth 15 grand à week by à championship club i was told today by à forest supporter. Id believe that b4 id believe hes coming back to us.
please dont feed the trollYou can only approach a player to sign a pre contract arrangement in the Jan window... :facepalm:
But I think it went wrong on Tuesday when we did go two upfront.
For ball retention, obviously 5 in midfield is better.
Kind of agree with this Otis.. but isn't it more about personnel rather than formation. For me Bailey offers more than Fleck and/or Barton in a central position... I think he moves the ball quicker and more efficiently, as well as offering more bite.. a midfield 4 of Moose, Bailey, with perm 2 from 4 -Jennings, Macca, Baker, Fleck might be the way to go at home.... particularly as the games stretches- second half 4-4-2 with perhaps 4-5-1 first half? Guess it depends on how the game is going?
Baker as a last 25 minute 'impact' player seems to get my approval?
Barton..? 'fraid I'm not a fan just yet?
Sign a winger with pace and if McG stays play 2 up front and bomb crosses inWhere would you play Moussa? I would worry about the lack of natural width and pace if we were reliant on 2 of macca, baker and fleck to provide width. With the 4231the extra man in midfield gives protection enabling the fullbacks to provide that width.
Sign a winger with pace and if McG stays play 2 up front and bomb crosses in
this 4321 is bollox
Where would you play Moussa? I would worry about the lack of natural width and pace if we were reliant on 2 of macca, baker and fleck to provide width. With the 4231the extra man in midfield gives protection enabling the fullbacks to provide that width.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?