It publishes what people say in parliament. So…..
It publishes what people say in parliament. So…..so Hansard publishes any old shit?
so Hansard publishes any old shit?
Surely more of a hope than expectation.An expectation that change might actually mean change, not more of the same. If only we had known that the day before the election.
so Hansard publishes any old shit?
An expectation that change might actually mean change, not more of the same. If only we had known that the day before the election.
so Hansard publishes any old shit?
Starmer has ‘lost control of borders’ after record small-boat crossings
Over 650 migrants reach UK via Channel on Saturday, taking this year’s total to more than 8,000www.telegraph.co.uk
Why let facts get in the way of a bullshit telegraph headline hey Malc
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
France agrees to intercept migrant boats for first time
Country’s naval forces expanded with six new patrol vessels to intercept ‘taxi boats’ before they leave for the UK
France has pledged to come up with a plan within the next six weeks to intercept migrant “taxi boats” at sea for the first time.
French interior ministry sources said they will target boats within 300 metres of the beaches to stop them leaving for the UK loaded with migrants.
The strategy aims to be ready for the Franco-British summit, which begins on July 8, when Emmanuel Macron, the French president, will travel to London for a state visit.
Nope.Going by the date on your link then shouldn’t the thread title be Sunak lost control of the borders?
i didn’t say I agreed with any of Starmer’s utterances published in Hansard. I’m suggesting it may be a more reliable and impartial information source than, say, Geebeebies. Other than for reporting the time, obviously.So you agree with everything said by Keir Starmer as long as it’s recorded in Hansard?
That's quite a turn up for the books.
The detail is all false? On what basis can you be so sure?Why let facts get in the way of a bullshit telegraph headline hey Malc
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ahh okay. So if that’s your metric the trend under Labour (although there’s yet to be a full year with Labour in government) is down. Considerably. So based on that shouldn’t the thread title be Conservatives lost control of borders.Nope.
Losing control of the borders is the number of people arriving, not the cost consequence of them arriving
Your source isn't Hansard, your source is Andrea Jenkyns. How are you so bad at this?i didn’t say I agreed with any of Starmer’s utterances published in Hansard. I’m suggesting it may be a more reliable and impartial information source than, say, Geebeebies. Other than for reporting the time, obviously.
The problem we've got in the UK is viewing rising property prices as evidence of a healthy economy, despite the damage it has already causedBritain's booming housing markets: 10 areas where sales have spiked
Areas in Manchester and West Yorkshire have seen agreed property sales jump by more than 80% thanks to their 'affordability and value'.www.thisismoney.co.uk
Is something stirring?
Of course, it will be viewed as bullshit. Too much to ask for any green shoots of recovery after 10 months of a Labour government who have a programme of change.
The problem we've got in the UK is viewing rising property prices as evidence of a healthy economy, despite the damage it has already caused
It is sickens me when I see episodes of home's under the hammer with it's sexed up presentation style!The problem we've got in the UK is viewing rising property prices as evidence of a healthy economy, despite the damage it has already caused
Falling property prices wouldn’t be evidence of a healthy economy either though.The problem we've got in the UK is viewing rising property prices as evidence of a healthy economy, despite the damage it has already caused
The hyping up of football coverage has gone too far as well.It is sickens me when I see episodes of home's under the hammer with it's sexed up presentation style!
Not necessarily. Might mean the money is invested in something productive.Falling property prices wouldn’t be evidence of a healthy economy either though.
Not necessarily. Might mean the money is invested in something productive.
There needs to be a property market crash, it was needed after 2008 yet governments decided to protect the interests of lenders by bailing them out.Or tied up in a mortgage in negative equity. Debt, not something productive at all. Quite the opposite in fact.
People not able to sell the property for fear of crystalising the debt and creating another banking crisis like 2008. Would that be good for anyone?
Fucking hell.This guy cracks me up, but he does have a point!
If they hadn’t mentioned change quite so often it wouldn’t have made such an impression.Surely more of a hope than expectation.
Given that their entire campaign and manifesto basically said 'more of the same Tory thinking' I don't see why you had an expectation of change.
Sure, them coming in and saying "there's no money" and continuing along austerity lines was disappointing, but given the manifesto not a huge shock.
Or tied up in a mortgage in negative equity. Debt, not something productive at all. Quite the opposite in fact.
People not able to sell the property for fear of crystalising the debt and creating another banking crisis like 2008. Would that be good for anyone?
They aren’t allowed to lie to parliament though, so it’s not literally any old shit.Hansard publishes a record of what was said on the day. Given who said it, that probably would incude "any old shit". I have provided you with the original source of her information and shown that she has deliberately misrepresented it.
Why let facts get in the way of a bullshit telegraph headline hey Malc
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They aren’t allowed to lie to parliament though...
That's a defacto lie.They aren’t allowed to lie to parliament though, so it’s not literally any old shit.
They aren’t allowed to lie to parliament though, so it’s not literally any old shit.
What for repeating facts.....? It's important to have some balance to counteract the thick as pig shit numbskulls out there (no offence)That makes it all right then.
Fucking pillock.
Genuinely funny that you’re tripling down on this.They aren’t allowed to lie to parliament though, so it’s not literally any old shit.
Your source isn't Hansard, your source is Andrea Jenkyns. How are you so bad at this?
Genuinely funny that you’re tripling down on this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?