Ive heard all your views many times and they are all hysterical fantasy so no, probably best you stay at home and keep your ranting to here.
Can we have a ground with 4 stands and not a sh*tty bowl that looks like many other grounds, just with different colour seats?
Just saying....
WM
A bowl is 4 stands with the corners filled in. :facepalm:
I very much doubt that the second round of meetings will ever happen. They've got to be seen to be doing something and what a perfect set of yes men to invite along.You have to wonder if this Sandra Garlick is receiving money under false pretences, she is a highly respected solicitor so obviously no mug but here she is forming a so-called committee to discuss project detail on a stadium where as yet there is no site, no hint of a site even yet there are supposed to be two possibilities, no planning either. As I said she's no mug and I would say almost certainly if there are sites she knows where, so I ask those who attend before any questions or debate ask and keep asking where the proposed site is, just a north, east, south, west of Coventry would do for now.
Those who attend Thursday prove you are not just a tea and biscuit brigade and demand to know the location of these proposed sites.
You should do that, get pissed as a fart and hurl abuse from the back of the room. Would make it well worth going .
Which if you read his post Weeman was saying he didn't want.
He said he would prefer four stands, which isn't a bowl as the corners aren't filled in. :facepalm:
Now there's a thought. Thinking about it it wouldn't take a lot to get the whole shitty meeting abandoned.
Exactly, what difference does not filling the corners in do to the atmosphere.
You cant walk around the ground and you need 4 separate catering facilities.
Even at Highfield Road they tried to match the height of the stands so they could fill the corners in for the East stand.
Four self supporting roof structures also make is more expensive.
Do that though and the club would then just have no engagement with fans and would make everything a closed shop............I know that probably wont make much difference in that SISU have done what they want anyway, but at least with fans being able to go (and I mean both meetings for ST and then non ST holders) we may at least get some sense of how much bullshit is on the table and when they really aim to try to get their hands on the Ricoh.
"Yuz are all a bunch of scab bastards. Im valiant, and im gonna fight yerz all."
I have news from a reliable source that the new ground will happen and as we have all been told its not in Coventry, the location is Ryton and its the old Peugeot site as rumoured by many.
Wellthats a difficult rumour to spread. The old Peugeot site is now owned by Prologis and being built on as we speak. But if that became a possibity planning will be difficult the residents of Ryton and surrounding villages like Bubbehall and Baginton have in the past fought off expansion plans when the car factory was there and had been for years and similarly with plans for a larger passenger terminal at Baginton Airport that was also killed off. A football stadium that needs to be multi-purpose for extra revenue streams, Fishers words, doubt it very much.I have news from a reliable source that the new ground will happen and as we have all been told its not in Coventry, the location is Ryton and its the old Peugeot site as rumoured by many.
I don't know much about Sandra Garlick, but I think it's fair to say that we houldn't treat Ms Garlick like a Sisu employee, after all she is a City fan just like the rest of us.
I dont have any issues with ST holders first. That is the way it would be anywhere surely?
As as Season Ticket holder I will be attending. I do agree this has been badly handled and should have been a first come fist served meeting rather than ST holders first.
I think most of the ST holders there will make that point and continue to make the point that a return to the Ricoh is what we want but we have to face the once unbelievable possibility that may never happen.
Will report back here Friday on how credible the new stadium plans are. Up to you whether you believe me or not but it will be a genuine opinion.
A bowl is 4 stands with the corners filled in. :facepalm:
You have to wonder if this Sandra Garlick is receiving money under false pretences, she is a highly respected solicitor so obviously no mug but here she is forming a so-called committee to discuss project detail on a stadium where as yet there is no site, no hint of a site even yet there are supposed to be two possibilities, no planning either. As I said she's no mug and I would say almost certainly if there are sites she knows where, so I ask those who attend before any questions or debate ask and keep asking where the proposed site is, just a north, east, south, west of Coventry would do for now.
Those who attend Thursday prove you are not just a tea and biscuit brigade and demand to know the location of these proposed sites.
Er, yeah, I know. My personal preference is to not have the corners filled in. With 4 seperate stands??![]()