Stadium Forum Meeting (4 Viewers)

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
Ive heard all your views many times and they are all hysterical fantasy so no, probably best you stay at home and keep your ranting to here.
 

valiant15

New Member
Ive heard all your views many times and they are all hysterical fantasy so no, probably best you stay at home and keep your ranting to here.

Nah fuck it, I think ill turn up few hours early with a few mates and have a few beer's in the bar.

You're welcome to join us.

Don't be shy about mixing with us rough Coventry folk.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Supporters have accused club officials of creating division among Coventry City fans.

The Sky Blue Trust hit out after the club announced only season ticket holders will be able to attend the first CCFC Stadium Forum meeting to shape a proposed new home for the Sky Blues on Thursday.

A meeting open to all supporters is scheduled to be held later in the month, but the decision to bar those who do not attend Sixfields from the first meeting caused anger among some fans.

Supporters were recently asked to apply to join the CCFC Stadium Forum panel but none have been selected as yet with the process expected to take several months.

Jan Mokrzycki, from the Sky Blue Trust, said: “It is a shame if they would like all supporters to be united behind this new stadium.“It seems to be creating division, two tiers of fans, it should have been open to anybody on a first come first serve basis. It should not matter if you go to Sixfields or not.

“There is already enough division among fans and then the club seems to say the opinions of people who go to Sixfields are more valued than other supporters. It just seems strange.”

Supporters also raised issue with the fact no location has yet been identified for any potential new stadium.

Michael Orton, of the Keep Cov in Cov campaign, said: “A large number of City fans do not believe a new stadium will be built.
"There is a lot of concern about why this is taking so long. Rather than vague talk, the most important thing, if this is real, is the site and that is what really matters.

“A stadium on the city boundary is one thing, but a stadium near the NEC is a completely different matter.”
Sandra Garlick, head of the CCFC Stadium Forum, underlined that all supporters would eventually get the chance to attend a forum meeting.

She said: “There will be an open meeting later in the month and a further meeting for all those who have registered an interest in being part of the committee.

"Meetings will be scheduled throughout the coming months so that all fans have an opportunity to input their views. The process will be wholly inclusive, and this first meeting is the start of the process.

“I have said all along that my only interest is to ensure that the club returns to the Coventry area in a home that reflects the tradition and ambition of the club, and the wishes of all supporters.”
 

jesus-wept

New Member
Nothing more than a fuckin' tea and biscuit grigade
 

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
You should do that, get pissed as a fart and hurl abuse from the back of the room. Would make it well worth going .
 

jesus-wept

New Member
You have to wonder if this Sandra Garlick is receiving money under false pretences, she is a highly respected solicitor so obviously no mug but here she is forming a so-called committee to discuss project detail on a stadium where as yet there is no site, no hint of a site even yet there are supposed to be two possibilities, no planning either. As I said she's no mug and I would say almost certainly if there are sites she knows where, so I ask those who attend before any questions or debate ask and keep asking where the proposed site is, just a north, east, south, west of Coventry would do for now.
Those who attend Thursday prove you are not just a tea and biscuit brigade and demand to know the location of these proposed sites.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
A bowl is 4 stands with the corners filled in. :facepalm:

Which if you read his post Weeman was saying he didn't want.

He said he would prefer four stands, which isn't a bowl as the corners aren't filled in. :facepalm:
 

valiant15

New Member
You have to wonder if this Sandra Garlick is receiving money under false pretences, she is a highly respected solicitor so obviously no mug but here she is forming a so-called committee to discuss project detail on a stadium where as yet there is no site, no hint of a site even yet there are supposed to be two possibilities, no planning either. As I said she's no mug and I would say almost certainly if there are sites she knows where, so I ask those who attend before any questions or debate ask and keep asking where the proposed site is, just a north, east, south, west of Coventry would do for now.
Those who attend Thursday prove you are not just a tea and biscuit brigade and demand to know the location of these proposed sites.
I very much doubt that the second round of meetings will ever happen. They've got to be seen to be doing something and what a perfect set of yes men to invite along.

Mugs.
 

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
I just hope that the current season ticket holders don't just think of themselves at this meeting. And see it as an opportunity to discuss the criteria required for the return of all the ccfc fans.
Remember if the 90% of fan base can't be encouraged back then Ccfc has no future.
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Just for Valiant:

Saying why were you creeping 'round last night
Why could i see two shadows moving in your bedroom light
Now your dressed in black when i left you were dressed in white
Can you fill me in?
Calls diverted to answerphone
Red wine bottle half the contents gone
Midnight return jacuzzi turned on
Can you fill me in?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Which if you read his post Weeman was saying he didn't want.

He said he would prefer four stands, which isn't a bowl as the corners aren't filled in. :facepalm:

Exactly, what difference does not filling the corners in do to the atmosphere.
You cant walk around the ground and you need 4 separate catering facilities.

Even at Highfield Road they tried to match the height of the stands so they could fill the corners in for the East stand.

Four self supporting roof structures also make is more expensive.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
Now there's a thought. Thinking about it it wouldn't take a lot to get the whole shitty meeting abandoned.

Do that though and the club would then just have no engagement with fans and would make everything a closed shop............I know that probably wont make much difference in that SISU have done what they want anyway, but at least with fans being able to go (and I mean both meetings for ST and then non ST holders) we may at least get some sense of how much bullshit is on the table and when they really aim to try to get their hands on the Ricoh.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
Exactly, what difference does not filling the corners in do to the atmosphere.
You cant walk around the ground and you need 4 separate catering facilities.

Even at Highfield Road they tried to match the height of the stands so they could fill the corners in for the East stand.

Four self supporting roof structures also make is more expensive.

He was just posting his preference.
 

valiant15

New Member
Do that though and the club would then just have no engagement with fans and would make everything a closed shop............I know that probably wont make much difference in that SISU have done what they want anyway, but at least with fans being able to go (and I mean both meetings for ST and then non ST holders) we may at least get some sense of how much bullshit is on the table and when they really aim to try to get their hands on the Ricoh.

I agree.

Ill wash the cars instead.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
I would have thought that waiting for the location to be announced first gives plenty of time to have an input on this.
I might be interested in making a contribution if it was North Coventry as I am in Bedworth.
But if the stadium is in Leamington, Kenilworth, Solihull or Rugby I would loose interest in the club altogether.

This is just a farce until location is confirmed and I hazard a guess it's timed for the JR.
 

WestEndAgro

Well-Known Member
I have news from a reliable source that the new ground will happen and as we have all been told its not in Coventry, the location is Ryton and its the old Peugeot site as rumoured by many.
 

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
Not selfish at all then?? - I had to slog all the way from South warwickshire to the Ricoh(in BEDWORTH) so you can bloody well be a bit more flexible about the location of the ground as well.
 

Mr T - Sukka!

Active Member
I have news from a reliable source that the new ground will happen and as we have all been told its not in Coventry, the location is Ryton and its the old Peugeot site as rumoured by many.

Its definatley not here. Its been confirmed on BBC CWR that the site was purchased amd planning permission granted to a company thats business related and nothing to do with football. If i can find the link i will post it.
 

jesus-wept

New Member
I have news from a reliable source that the new ground will happen and as we have all been told its not in Coventry, the location is Ryton and its the old Peugeot site as rumoured by many.
Wellthats a difficult rumour to spread. The old Peugeot site is now owned by Prologis and being built on as we speak. But if that became a possibity planning will be difficult the residents of Ryton and surrounding villages like Bubbehall and Baginton have in the past fought off expansion plans when the car factory was there and had been for years and similarly with plans for a larger passenger terminal at Baginton Airport that was also killed off. A football stadium that needs to be multi-purpose for extra revenue streams, Fishers words, doubt it very much.
 

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
Only live on Browns Lane so might pop down as this seems like it will be fun. Have a game of golf and then just hang around in the bar for the fireworks to begin :slap:
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
I don't know much about Sandra Garlick, but I think it's fair to say that we houldn't treat Ms Garlick like a Sisu employee, after all she is a City fan just like the rest of us.

by constantly saying "coventry area" suggests she is on one side more than the other !
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I can't see that as a problem as long as everyone has a say. As a ST holder I won't be attending. Like others, I can't see the point.

I dont have any issues with ST holders first. That is the way it would be anywhere surely?
 

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
As as Season Ticket holder I will be attending. I do agree this has been badly handled and should have been a first come fist served meeting rather than ST holders first.

I think most of the ST holders there will make that point and continue to make the point that a return to the Ricoh is what we want but we have to face the once unbelievable possibility that may never happen.

Will report back here Friday on how credible the new stadium plans are. Up to you whether you believe me or not but it will be a genuine opinion.

Are you hoping to actually see stadium plans, if you are does that mean that Sisu/Otium have purchased a site and had plans drawn up in readiness for planning permission or even to build ? Surely if that was the case we would have heard by now considering the song and dance they made about a couple of pictures that a schoolkid could have done on a decent turbocad. Will be interesting though to see what comes out of this meeting and how the people who attend Sixfields view it.
 

WestEndAgro

Well-Known Member
Only passing on what I was told by someone who knows one of our potential buyers, may prove to be duff info, we will see ?
 

The Gentleman

Well-Known Member
You have to wonder if this Sandra Garlick is receiving money under false pretences, she is a highly respected solicitor so obviously no mug but here she is forming a so-called committee to discuss project detail on a stadium where as yet there is no site, no hint of a site even yet there are supposed to be two possibilities, no planning either. As I said she's no mug and I would say almost certainly if there are sites she knows where, so I ask those who attend before any questions or debate ask and keep asking where the proposed site is, just a north, east, south, west of Coventry would do for now.
Those who attend Thursday prove you are not just a tea and biscuit brigade and demand to know the location of these proposed sites.

Would be interesting if someone there could ask her if she is receiving a fee for this. Alternatively, if she is getting cheap or free advertising as a result (or maybe a couple of season tickets for Sixfields) and an add on question that if she does business in Coventry and due to the unpopularity of this proposed move, does she think that being associated with it will affect her business.
 

kevinleftpeg

New Member
Torchy- Please try & ensure you voice the issues & concerns of the 95% of us that 'have not' & 'will not' go to Northampton, as well as your own. Thank you
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top