Sixfields attendees (4 Viewers)

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
I hope PH4 doesn't buy us in the future. He's only interested in the arena and the surrounding land. He'll also charge us millions to play in our own ground.

I haven't searched. Why would I? You peddle your "hunch" as truth when it's not. No one knows either way.

You see some would ask you if you know this as fact or who your source is.

Others would know this is a forum and that this is your opinion and they would get on with just agreeing or disagreeing with you.
 

AndreasB

Well-Known Member
lordsummerisle.....Who is standing up for SiSUE(which does work better than SUESUE, which sounds more like a Buddy Holly outtake)?............The clue is in Astute's wording(Much better).............................................................................................................Where do you want me to start? RFC(Stone cold banker) Then with their seemingly Pro-SISU posts...YOU,Torchy,Grenduffy,ccfc4life to name but five. If you're not Pro-SISU, you've all got a funny way of showing it...Why go to great length's to disprove Anti-SISU posts?....Don't say it's for "Balance" Surely that is for SISU followers to do ;)

That my friend, is the ranting incoherence that the few people on here that manage to think for themselves and express that with clarity are up against. Of course it is simply dismissed as "Pro SISU" - still worth us having a go through- not everyone thinks the same way.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
IMHO I can't see SUESUE taking on the Guardian. We know that the vast majority of what was said to be the truth. If it came to court the whole truth would come out. All of us should want this.

BTW NW still waiting for your reply :)

My reply above, about us actually having the option to buy our ground?!?

My reply about what?!? I answered every single fecking post you made, and even said I was off to a fecking Christmas party so couldn't edit out the fecking ? marks from the quote!
 

magic82ball

New Member
That my friend, is the ranting incoherence that the few people on here that manage to think for themselves and express that with clarity are up against. Of course it is simply dismissed as "Pro SISU" - still worth us having a go through- not everyone thinks the same way.

You know you've lost an argument when AndreasB joins in on your side...
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Sisu Christmas party then?

Very possibly, just as little spent on the expenses!

You know you're in trouble when you have to bid on a bottle of whisky in the charity auction just to get some alcohol down your throat... and I don't even like whisky!
 

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
Very possibly, just as little spent on the expenses!

You know you're in trouble when you have to bid on a bottle of whisky in the charity auction just to get some alcohol down your throat... and I don't even like whisky!

Did you drink it to Lily the Pink though once you got it?
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
sorry but what is withholding rent then

Allowing ACL the opportunity to operate without the club there and make more money without the club than with apparently.

In fact it seems that the club leaving the Ricoh has made ACL a far more profitable business than it was before, so all right thinking taxpayers and supporters of local charities should be thankful that the millstone of the club has been removed from The Ricoh's neck.
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
Allowing ACL the opportunity to operate without the club there and make more money without the club than with apparently.

In fact it seems that the club leaving the Ricoh has made ACL a far more profitable business than it was before, so all right thinking taxpayers and supporters of local charities should be thankful that the millstone of the club has been removed from The Ricoh's neck.


it means ACL have worked out a solution to keep them profitable without the footie could make more with it even on the last offer of rent free.and you must expect to pay running costs for ground etc
 

magic82ball

New Member
Allowing ACL the opportunity to operate without the club there and make more money without the club than with apparently.

In fact it seems that the club leaving the Ricoh has made ACL a far more profitable business than it was before, so all right thinking taxpayers and supporters of local charities should be thankful that the millstone of the club has been removed from The Ricoh's neck.
To say "In fact it seems" is an oxymoron, either it is a fact, or it seems. Which is it? I only ask as in fact it seems you have an obsession with facts.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
To say "In fact it seems" is an oxymoron, either it is a fact, or it seems. Which is it? I only ask as in fact it seems you have an obsession with facts.

OSB said it was the case, so it would have to be a Gold Standard fact, with added kite marks of quality.
 

magic82ball

New Member
Fair enough, it's definitely fact then.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You see some would ask you if you know this as fact or who your source is.

Others would know this is a forum and that this is your opinion and they would get on with just agreeing or disagreeing with you.

If he didn't do as torch says he would be a fool and unfit for purpose.
 

GaryPendrysEyes

Well-Known Member
So let's sum up.

Sisu are a terrible owner, who in 6 years have got us relegated, led us to Administration, sold off most assets whilst increasing the debt to 70m and moved us to Northampton as leverage to get their hands on The Ricoh. They have reduced revenue by 80% and gates by 10,000. They have disaffected and divided the fanbase as never before and have now threatened supporters with legal action for posting a link to a newspaper story.

and some still act as if they, our owners, are a bit of a side show in all this. They point anywhere else they can but never at the owner, who are responsible for the stewardship of this club.
 

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
So let's sum up.

Sisu are a terrible owner, who in 6 years have got us relegated, led us to Administration, sold off most assets whilst increasing the debt to 70m and moved us to Northampton as leverage to get their hands on The Ricoh. They have reduced revenue by 80% and gates by 10,000. They have disaffected and divided the fanbase as never before and have now threatened supporters with legal action for posting a link to a newspaper story.

and some still act as if they, our owners, are a bit of a side show in all this. They point anywhere else they can but never at the owner, who are responsible for the stewardship of this club.

No No No:eek::thinking about:OK then that pretty much sums it up
 

henry the wasp

Well-Known Member
So according to lordsummerisle, acl and ccc have apparently threatened to sue supporters of the club. His source for this is Deleted member 5849.
Shouldn't this be a thread on its own?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
So let's sum up.

Sisu are a terrible owner, who in 6 years have got us relegated, led us to Administration, sold off most assets whilst increasing the debt to 70m and moved us to Northampton as leverage to get their hands on The Ricoh. They have reduced revenue by 80% and gates by 10,000. They have disaffected and divided the fanbase as never before and have now threatened supporters with legal action for posting a link to a newspaper story.

and some still act as if they, our owners, are a bit of a side show in all this. They point anywhere else they can but never at the owner, who are responsible for the stewardship of this club.

At work all night now. But even if I wasn't I couldn't put it better.
 

ohitsaidwalker king power

Well-Known Member
So let's sum up.

Sisu are a terrible owner, who in 6 years have got us relegated, led us to Administration, sold off most assets whilst increasing the debt to 70m and moved us to Northampton as leverage to get their hands on The Ricoh. They have reduced revenue by 80% and gates by 10,000. They have disaffected and divided the fanbase as never before and have now threatened supporters with legal action for posting a link to a newspaper story.

and some still act as if they, our owners, are a bit of a side show in all this. They point anywhere else they can but never at the owner, who are responsible for the stewardship of this club.

Sadly I had to "like" this post.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
At work all night now. But even if I wasn't I couldn't put it better.

He said sisu not SueSue. You need to get the message out a bit more.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Semantics my dear fellow semantics........Would you care to respond to the the post properly? Or should I take it that you agree?

No it's just drivel from someone who never goes to matches - he is a troll.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Semantics my dear fellow semantics........Would you care to respond to the the post properly? Or should I take it that you agree?

Only a fool wouldn't agree.

Thinking about it this must mean Grendull doesn't agree.
 

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
So let's sum up.

Sisu are a terrible owner, who in 6 years have got us relegated, led us to Administration, sold off most assets whilst increasing the debt to 70m and moved us to Northampton as leverage to get their hands on The Ricoh. They have reduced revenue by 80% and gates by 10,000. They have disaffected and divided the fanbase as never before and have now threatened supporters with legal action for posting a link to a newspaper story.

and some still act as if they, our owners, are a bit of a side show in all this. They point anywhere else they can but never at the owner, who are responsible for the stewardship of this club.
There you go Grendel Reply fully or lose all credibility.
 
So let's sum up.

Sisu are a terrible owner, who in 6 years have got us relegated, led us to Administration, sold off most assets whilst increasing the debt to 70m and moved us to Northampton as leverage to get their hands on The Ricoh. They have reduced revenue by 80% and gates by 10,000. They have disaffected and divided the fanbase as never before and have now threatened supporters with legal action for posting a link to a newspaper story.

and some still act as if they, our owners, are a bit of a side show in all this. They point anywhere else they can but never at the owner, who are responsible for the stewardship of this club.

They have reduced the gates by 18000 in 6 years
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
There you go Grendel Reply fully or lose all credibility.

LOL -- as if I need to have "credibility" from a clown like him.

This club was deemed to die the day it had to sign an unworkable agreement from a greedy, selfish council. Whoever was in charge the point would have come where destruction was inevitable due to inherrent uncompetitiveness.

Strangely the club has never faced administration or liquidation in 120 years until into had to work with the caring, sharing council. Strangely many other clubs work very well with their councils and stranger still their arrangements are far, far superior to ours.

Unless that relationship ends the club is dead.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
He hasn't got any to lose.

Says the pitiful former hedge fund worshipper who used to ejeculate in his Y Fronts whenever the word "sisu" was mentioned. Always the sheep eh Italia?
 

CovFan

Well-Known Member
The club was deemed to die the second it was taken over by a hedge fund that didn't do its due diligence into agreements it already had.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top