No it won't. More like sympathy.
No one has explained why it will hurt CCFC more than Sisu although for some reason you think they have.
To most it just shows that the owners of CCFC have made a profit.
The problem with this is it actually plays into SISU's hands, makes it easier for them to discredit things which *are* true, and enables them to put doubt in minds when very real criticisms can be raised at them.Thats the rub Nick, state what Sisu have done but they lose all credibility when they print nonsense like this. If they cannot be arsed to research where the money will have come from such as other investments dont bother. Lazy journalism as usual.
We have OSB surely other media outlets have the resources to investigate Sisu`s portfolio or is it just easier to join the band wagon.
I have already explained why it will be negative towards CCFC....
I have also explained the issue with why it isn't always a good thing why getting people worked up about SISU before it can be proven. Others have also pointed this out to you.
There is a massive benefit to everybody's attention being on SISU for some people though isn't there?
Am I not getting all the posts ?
No one has explained why CCFC will get any negativity and from where.
They have explained that the media has posted Sisu profits, told us they are CCFC owners and more than likely made some people think that they are taking money out the club, but that's it.
Nick has clearly explained that it will engage the nopm brigade once more thus will have a detrimental effect on the club in terms of finance and support. It's not that hard to understand.Am I not getting all the posts ?
No one has explained why CCFC will get any negativity and from where.
They have explained that the media has posted Sisu profits, told us they are CCFC owners and more than likely made some people think that they are taking money out the club, but that's it.
Am I not getting all the posts ?
No one has explained why CCFC will get any negativity and from where.
They have explained that the media has posted Sisu profits, told us they are CCFC owners and more than likely made some people think that they are taking money out the club, but that's it.
Thats the rub Nick, state what Sisu have done but they lose all credibility when they print nonsense like this. If they cannot be arsed to research where the money will have come from such as other investments dont bother. Lazy journalism as usual.
We have OSB surely other media outlets have the resources to investigate Sisu`s portfolio or is it just easier to join the band wagon.
It's putting Sisu in a bad light.
What's not to like ??
Maybe you are just indulging in some selective reading or acting a bit slow on purpose because you have no answer and want to distract from people pointing out the agendas...
If not and you genuinely can't keep up with the discussions then why bother?
No, your just wrong.
There is nothing not to like for anything that puts Wasps in a bad light either as they are a threat to the very existence of the football club....is there?
You know my stance on this'd although it's nothing to do with this thread I'll indulge you.
I will never again put anything positive forward for Sisu but I will allow them to drop into the background while the club is going in the right direction.
As for Wasps being a threat to CCFC I don't see that at all. In fact I see co-existance as the only way both will survive.
So why not prove me wrong? It's weird how you only want to reply to my posts.
It's easy.
There are no posts in this thread that give the reason why CCFC will be negatively effected by the reports on Sisu profits more than Sisu.
Fucking hell. Have you got every SBT poster on ignore apart from Nick? It's been explained multiple times you clown.It's easy.
There are no posts in this thread that give the reason why CCFC will be negatively effected by the reports on Sisu profits more than Sisu.
Nope read through again, just in case.There clearly are. Maybe re-read, people have taken the time to explain it in child terms for you but you are just showing you have no interest and just want to try to play the "thick" act which is wearing thin and is too obvious.
Fucking hell. Have you got every SBT poster on ignore apart from Nick? It's been explained multiple times you clown.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Nope read through again, just in case.
The reports are not factually wrong and people are right in saying that one interpretation they could take is that Sisu are making money from CCFC.
But I can't see where anybody reflects on it being more negative for CCFC than Sisu.
Unless....... I see that you have commented on something about CCFC making money for Sisu might be one interpretation, also CD comments on TF using it as a deflection.
Other than that I think we agree on it could wrongly influence what people think of the CCFC SISU financial relationship.
We disagree on who it effects more.
Quids in for Coventry City as owners see a huge jump in profits
Sisu Accounts - An Indicator Of Where Some Of City's Money Is Going
Look at posts 76 and 77 it's explained clearly why it will be detrimental to CCFC.Okay, What has been explained.?
Look at posts 76 and 77 it's explained clearly why it will be detrimental to CCFC.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
They came after I asked the question and I missed them in the crossfire.
I don't read tweets so I'm looking at the news outlets only on here.
I think NOPM is a falicy. It's just an excuse not to go. It's obsolete while the team is doing well.
Similar sort of argument where NOPM have no facts on SISU/CCFC finance relationship so they are arguing with no facts.
Nope read through again, just in case.
They came through after you made the quote there were loads of people.You said you had read through again...
Why do you keep making things up?
You are now openly saying you only read on here and "news outlets". Maybe listen to the multiple others who read a bit more then and are explaining it to you?
They came through after you made the quote there were loads of people.
You are arguing about nothing.
Whats your agenda? It seems more about stopping any negative effect on Sisu to me as I can't see how it 'really' effects CCFC in any manner.
The turn out at Wembley shows that the team gets supported when it's doing well and that's all that has an effect on attendance.
What are you on about? Read through the thread again, look at the order of the posts...
This isn't a negative effect on SISU. You have been told how it effects CCFC. You have also been told how it actually gives SISU an easier ride.
If you are too thick to understand it then stop trying to argue and making threads go on like they do.
The reasons that were inferred earlier and now have later been pointed out are chicken sh1t. No wonder I missed them.
Calling people thick because they don't agree with your opinion is in itself crass.
ADVICE : If you stop commenting the threads would be a lot shorter.
Wasn't going to say more but...
What annoys me is that they don't actually think about what they are reporting. Sisu group reported income 3.9m paid out just over 1m in costs and made 2.86m profits. Yet somewhere in that they paid nearly 3m to directors..... how??? Amounts paid to directors are cost to the business
The figures for sisu partners Ltd are consolidated in to the group accounts which means anything for the directors is too. The profit allocation is simple moving monies from one part of the group to another. It has to be reported because technically the sisu partners is a separate entity but it is a plus in one part of the group and a negative in another. Their profit allocation is made up of the 888k from sisu capital plus profits from other operations but because sisu partners is controlled by sisu capital the full amount is reported in sisu capital accounts. In this case to see what has gone on looked at the sheets marked consolidated.
Drawings are not an addition to profits but a paying out of profits available. The CT have effectively double counted.
The arvo charge is a charge by a fund managed by sisu. It operates in much the same way as a bank debenture on a loan or overdraft for a business. It does not mean the bank or arvo dip in to the trading business as they feel fit, like draw off transfer fees etc, it is there to make sure they get their money back if things go wrong. Could they demand repayment yes. Could otium repay part yes. Could repayment help yes because less debt and less annual interest.
Sisu take an agreed amount in profit share or service charges. That's part of the total.... if they took 100% what would be left for next year? The investment would be dead.
Transfer dealings are disclosed in the otium accounts. The only entity that can buy or sell players is otium. Arvo could draw down it's capital or interest. So far no evidence it has. The only way that sbsl can draw down anything is by dividend .... it would presently be illegal to do so. Sisu capital international is owed 700k I believe so they could draw from that. Sisu capital itself could charge the funds that have invested fees, it could charge administration fees to otium but there is no evidence it has.
What sisu capital cannot do is simply just pocket funds because it is a fundamental accounting rule that for every credit there is a corresponding and equal debit. Income in sisu capital would show up as cost in otium.
What is being said in clearly ill informed at best comment as others have said greatly detracts and hinders any challenge to what is really going on
ADVICE : If you stop commenting the threads would be a lot shorter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?