letsallsingtogether
Well-Known Member
Like most post on here then.
So really your post saying £10M is an estimation rather than being accurate...?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Like most post on here then.
So really your post saying £10M is an estimation rather than being accurate...?
Are you saying that the odds are that the loan will have been reduced in any way?
By how much?
By whom?
An educated guess would say it would cost them 10m minimum. Wishful thinking would say less. But you choose to question me on an educated guess where the facts of present finances are there and no proof in the slightest are there that it would be less than 10m.
Chief Dave, The article was by their new star reporter.
Chief Dave, The article was by their new star reporter.
But a very one sided view.
CCC got questioned.
Higgs got questioned.
Wasps got questioned.
Joy did all the talking. And there were a fair few points that she made that should have been questioned.
I agree that talking about a new stadium as well as the 50% does seem crazy. But she is in negotiations and does not want to completely reveal her hand.
Would you when buying something a person wants to sell not want a crutch to use that you could lean on in negotiations?
I rate Joy as a business person but dont like what she has done in the pursuit of business objectives to CCFC.
The sooner we get on and own 50% the better with a long term aim of getting Wasps 50% cheap when the city of Coventry votes with its feet on Wasps rugby club.
Wasps will return to their fans in London we get the other 50% for a good price. Great news all round.
Any assumption that I state on here would be the same as yourself, a guess without the full evidence, we can only speculate, hence why I said from the offset on this thread, over to Higgs let's see what they come back with..
You would know all about one sided views.
But a very one sided view.
CCC got questioned.
Higgs got questioned.
Wasps got questioned.
Joy did all the talking. And there were a fair few points that she made that should have been questioned.
You would know all about one sided views.
You would know all about one sided views.
I would. I read your posts
So your saying this article isn't one sided?
I would have thought if SISU could buy 50% at a price then WASPS would be prepared to pay more to get them and thus have 100% control
Makes sound bargaining sense to me
Depends on what side you are on?
Yeah that's been a possibility In all this ,a little sweetener to play ball .
Or he could use the Discount he appeared to get when buying out CCC and take the Lot .
Would they finally walk for say £10M?
But he knew what the answers were going to be before he sent in the questions.
We could have told him on here....
Should have pushed Joy for the location of our new ground?? fuck me only 2 year wait.
Why would anything that happens to Wasps risk a 10 points deduction? Is this just an attempt at scaremongering?
Agree but I find it amusing he only pipes up on here for his own agenda.
But you are questioning the facts of what it would take to buy the Higgs share of ACL and half of what ACL owes whilst having no evidence in the slightest of a reduction of what is owed would have been reduced in any way to take a cheap shot at what I have said.
Yes we don't have the proof. But we have the evidence. Which is all we have had during the debacle of SISU taking over our club and everything that has happened since. And the evidence has been proved to be right nearly all the time.
Is the "sweetener" something outside of the ACL shares??
Or just ask to explain how we could lose 10 points for an egg chasing side getting into financial difficulties. If anything it would give SISU 100% of the 250 year Ricoh lease for less money than building a tinpot stadium in the middle of nowhere.
Wasn't referring to you with that, it was aimed at rob sSure, and it is a simple one, I want SISU out .. the sooner they are gone the better.. and the club can be run for football reasons once again.
The Wasps thing is tragic, but in my opinion largely a consequence of SISU's behaviour & tactics.
Wasn't referring to you with that, it was aimed at rob s
Evidence can be misleading it's not the be-all and end all something, unless you can show me where that figure is quoting it's MK better guess than me saying it's likely to rain tomorrow..
The Council can't veto anything if the sale has gone through, which they say it has. Wasps however will be able to veto it, so that will be the end of that.
When does Jack Griffin ever post about football? He only ever pipes up when his council chums come in for some grief.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?