Not the most thrilling or contentious read, but I'm sure there's something we can argue about.
Peter Ward seems keen on the 'arguing' approach.
Odd he wants solely pro-SISU to attend such meetings. Even Tim Fisher doesn't seem to want that!
The pro SISU approach is probably why they want to get Nick involved.
Peter Ward seems keen on the 'arguing' approach.
Odd he wants solely pro-SISU to attend such meetings. Even Tim Fisher doesn't seem to want that!
You mean he wants the Subordinate Collaborative Group?
I see the question of getting a mobile shop on match days was raised, they say it's 'impossible', I really don't think they are trying very hard.
Not a single reference to the Five Point Plan or any progress in that regard?
PW - who doesn't seem to have any "constituency" so far as I can see - amazingly thinks that his information about fans opinions towards Sisu is superior to that of:
a) The Sky Blue Trust survey;
b) A follow up poll in the Coventry Telegraph.
Also appears to twist the message sent by the Trust about inviting Sisu to seek new owners into the more simplistic "Sisu Out" slogan. While personally speaking, nothing would make me happier, the Trust poll question and response was more constructive.
The pro SISU approach is probably why they want to get Nick involved.
SBR stated that the SBT statements around FOI were not intended to discredit TF but were simply intended to present the responses the SBT had received to the FOIs.
TF then read a statement from CBRE, the property consultants, which highlighted that discussions had taken place with Rugby Borough Council on potential stadium sites and their deliverability.
I sometimes wonder if the SBT would be better off not attending. The SCG seem to spend more time talking about what the trust have or haven't done than anything else. If trust representatives didn't attend the SCG would have to talk about the issues at the club instead.
Save a lot of time
So have the club's property consultants discussed potential sites with Rugby Borough Council?
So have the club's property consultants discussed potential sites with Rugby Borough Council?
Didn't the earlier FOI's show that they'd been 1 speculative enquiry about the old Peugeot site at Ryton but everything had already been sold and planning agreed and on some sites ground had been broken?
Didn't the earlier FOI's show that they'd been 1 speculative enquiry about the old Peugeot site at Ryton but everything had already been sold and planning agreed and on some sites ground had been broken?
The usual load of old bollocks then........
"TF stated his intent for an open, honest and transparent approach to supporters" - is he having a fucking laugh?
PW challenged JM to explain how he could continue to be on the SCG when his personal view was that the owners should “go” - why shouldn't he still be on the SCG? So anyone who thinks SISU should go is not welcome in the group?
Confirmation if it were needed that the whole thing is a complete waste of time.
So have the club's property consultants discussed potential sites with Rugby Borough Council?
SISU say yes. RBC say no. RBC have to tell the truth. SISU twist the truth.
So who do you believe Grendel?
So TF seems to be accusing RBC of falsifying a FOI request again. He wants to be careful about those types of accusations.
What's interesting though is despite all evidence suggesting that no discussions have taken place, some fans still seem to think they have based on nothing more than TF's word.
On one hand we have a statement by someone at RBC, who if they have misled could find themselves punished with a custodial sentence.
On the other we have a man who has a history of misleading supporters, who has no evidence to back up his argument, and there will be no serious comeback on him for misleading.
All common sense suggests no discussions have taken place, yet this isn't good enough for some fans. You can see how accusations of "sisu defender/apologiser" come about.
said for a while that the club needs new commercial staff as the ones they have do not have a clueThey have nothing to sell in it so that must make it impossible.
We have the lowest stadium revenue in the league well maybe they should sack some of the people that are causing that people like Scope the commercial sales manager I wonder if Yeovil have one of those?
said for a while that the club needs new commercial staff as the ones they have do not have a clue
Total farce and the group is a sham and should be disbanded.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?