more like some secret society i think.
why ? because it all seems to the rest of us, a closed shop, who are they, what do they do, or say ?Why?
why ? because it all seems to the rest of us, a closed shop, who are they, what do they do, or say ?
do they have a site explaining their aims and meeting minutes ?
There is something on the CCFC site somewhere I think.
Have you been Noggin ?, i'd love to hear from these mystery people .The fans views aren't being represented at the SCG, I really don't think there is any doubt about that if you read the minutes from the last few meetings. It's just a forum for Labovich etc to spout of hate about acl, the council, weber shandwick and to try and fill the heads of those people who do want to represent the fans with lies. The people there who are there to represent the fans are between a rock and a hardplace though, they have been bullied by labovich and imo manipulated into playing nice by accusing them of some shocking things. I'm not criticizing people here (well other than the scum who run our club) their position is just impossible, but these meetings at this point in time are a complete farce and are no more than propaganda forums.
Have you been Noggin ?, i'd love to hear from these mystery people .
why don't they ?, whats the point if people who don't agree keep stum, surely all opinions should be aired, or what is the point ?No, I just read the minutes each week, the last lot were horrible. They wouldn't want me there, I'd be calling out labovich everytime he said something untrue, I do wish those there would too but I completely understand why they don't.
The fans views aren't being represented at the SCG, I really don't think there is any doubt about that if you read the minutes from the last few meetings. It's just a forum for Labovich etc to spout of hate about acl, the council, weber shandwick and to try and fill the heads of those people who do want to represent the fans with lies. The people there who are there to represent the fans are between a rock and a hardplace though, they have been bullied by labovich and imo manipulated into playing nice by accusing them of some shocking things. I'm not criticizing people here (well other than the scum who run our club) their position is just impossible, but these meetings at this point in time are a complete farce and are no more than propaganda forums.
Have you been Noggin ?, i'd love to hear from these mystery people .
why don't they ?, whats the point if people who don't agree keep stum, surely all opinions should be aired, or what is the point ?
The whole tone of the SCG seems to have changed in recent months and from reading the minutes it now seems less about the fans point of view being put over and more a chance for Labovich to place the blame on anyone else he can and accuse people of all sorts of things.
Maybe they just haven't had chance yet if it was only last night?
The Club do the minutes now don't they? after putting their spin on them. there is no direct quoting anymore just a summation of what was said. haven't they even removed from the minutes Labvovichs accusation that Simon Gilbert had misquoted him?
I don't know, I just know because Steve from the Trust said a couple of days ago he couldn't attend tomorrow because he was in Preston.
minutes reflect what was said at a meeting and if Mr Labovich is questioned its his views you are going to read, its not a matter of hi taking over, its him being questioned
Meeting was last night so please give minutes secretary a chance to type them up and distribute them among attendees for sign off. Once they are agreed the minutes will be released on CCFC official website first then others are free to publish them but was decided last night that they would first appear on the SCG section of CCFC website.
Jan, do you need to sign anything or agree to anything to say you can't write your own writeup of the meeting?
(This is not me saying you should as I am sure you are busy, but is there anything stopping you now like Kingharvest used to?)
Unless someone's signed an NDA there's no reason people can't post a factual account.
That is what I thought, surely there is nothing to stop people typing exactly what is said both ways. Don't even need to be offical "minutes".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?