Have never done one of these but I have it on good authority he will be with us this season, albeit on loan. I say good authority, its a mate connected to the clubs youth set up so take it as you will. Would take him mind.
Maatsen was pretty poor defensivelyHow did he do last season with QPR anyway?
He was good for us but if he's still the McCallum of old it's a shame to lose the attacking ability Maatsen gave us - an area Sam needed alot of improvement
Their young player of the yearHow did he do last season with QPR anyway?
He was good for us but if he's still the McCallum of old it's a shame to lose the attacking ability Maatsen gave us - an area Sam needed alot of improvement
He was their young player of the year and was stifled as an attacking threat by playing with a right footed LCB behind him whose passing stats were atrocious for that year.How did he do last season with QPR anyway?
He was good for us but if he's still the McCallum of old it's a shame to lose the attacking ability Maatsen gave us - an area Sam needed alot of improvement
Yeah I don't get the criticism of him as an attacking player, he gets forward well and even scoresHe was their young player of the year and was stifled as an attacking threat by playing with a right footed LCB behind him whose passing stats were atrocious for that year.
How did he do last season with QPR anyway?
He was good for us but if he's still the McCallum of old it's a shame to lose the attacking ability Maatsen gave us - an area Sam needed alot of improvement
Must be nearly 30 by now
Might be wrong but can only remember one Maatsen assist all season. Said many times last season he flattered to deceive.Still got his long throw and crossing and height. Maatsen had none of those but he was brilliant on the ball
McCallum 100% better than Maatsen
Yeah I don't get the criticism of him as an attacking player, he gets forward well and even scores
Maatsen younger and had potential but I would rather Mccallum here next yearNot looking good for Dortmund then if he’s not better than a Norwich reserve…
Yeah I don't get the criticism of him as an attacking player, he gets forward well and even scores
Maatsen younger and had potential but I would rather Mccallum here next year
That's because the ball was so often played behind him because of Hyam being right footed.Not sure I agree. He would rarely look to get forward and instead opt for a reverse back pass or square it. He's not particularly quick and is often reluctant to take players on. His crossing was also highly suspect.
That's because the ball was so often played behind him because of Hyam being right footed.
Someone made a YouTube compilation of it at some point and the lad so often had nowhere to turn apart from the easy ball back.
Would be a great signingProbably be able to get him permanently as doesn’t sound like Norwich are planning to use him anytime soon
£3m and one appearance laterWould be a great signing
Not sure I agree. He would rarely look to get forward and instead opt for a reverse back pass or square it. He's not particularly quick and is often reluctant to take players on. His crossing was also highly suspect.
He did get forward, he used to have to opt for a reverse back pass or square ball as Hyam used to play the ball behind him 95% of the time
Exactly. He did get forward and showed real ability in doing so at times. Giles was clearly a more offensive minded type of wing back but was also more predictable and suspect defensively. McCallum linked really well with Hamer and O'Hare, and many of his square passes were more effective than Giles entirely predictable runs.He did get forward, he used to have to opt for a reverse back pass or square ball as Hyam used to play the ball behind him 95% of the time
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?