Robins - CWR (3 Viewers)

Grendel · Jan 20, 2021

Sky Blue Pete said:
So you think he chose to keep him on cause he thinks he’s better than he is?
Or something else? What’s the rational logical reason?

He made a bad choice and got it wrong - like he has with other players. It happens but it’s an error of judgement

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 20, 2021

Grendel said:
He made a bad choice and got it wrong - like he has with other players. It happens but it’s an error of judgement

But you’re refusing to accept that he didn’t have much choice but it’s a rational opinion

Grendel · Jan 20, 2021

Sky Blue Pete said:
But you’re refusing to accept that he didn’t have much choice but it’s a rational opinion

Of course he had a choice - are you saying there is no other player on his wages we could have signed?

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 20, 2021

Grendel said:
Of course he had a choice - are you saying there is no other player on his wages we could have signed?

I’m saying that’s the choice. Who could he have signed on the same wages for the same position and got more out of? No and neither do I know

What do we know?

Baka was only gonna play a bit part
Would we have noticed had Godden and Walker been fit?

It’s fine I think I just have more patience with him than you. It’s not a wrong and right thing it’s an opinion thing

Johhny Blue · Jan 20, 2021

cc84cov said:
Shipley shouldn’t be close to that starting 11 for a start if he knew the game was over at 2-0 as he said in his interview why didn’t he just go 2 up top and just have a go at them

Can’t you be more creative than cut and paste?

NortonSkyBlue · Jan 20, 2021

PVA said:
The tactics and selection weren't the reason O'Hare missed his chance or Ostigard missed from 5 yards. The tactics weren't the reason Hyam overhit the pass and Fadz got sent off.

I'm not saying Robins is faultless and that he was faultless last night, but that result was on individual errors, not Robins' selections or tactics.

Yes the loss last night wasn’t about Robins, Shipley or Hyam alone. It was about missing chances before Reading got started, it was about calamitous errors from our players and it was about Reading having key individuals who were better than anything we have. Sometimes you have to take it on the chin.

ccfc92 · Jan 20, 2021

Brighton Sky Blue said:
Even if you ultimately still lose, at least put up some resistance and make the opposition earn the win

100%

But seems we can't even manage that.

shmmeee · Jan 20, 2021

Brighton Sky Blue said:
I get that, but I think it’s one of those ‘saying the quiet part loud’ moments. Teams can and do come back from 2 down not that uncommonly especially with half the game to play.

It wasn’t game over because of the score. You could see the players heads had gone.

If we’d have gone two up we’d probably have lost 4/5-0

Brighton Sky Blue · Jan 20, 2021

shmmeee said:
It wasn’t game over because of the score. You could see the players heads had gone.

If we’d have gone two up we’d probably have lost 4/5-0

It's that which concerns me most, same happened at PNE.

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Jan 20, 2021

shmmeee said:
It wasn’t game over because of the score. You could see the players heads had gone.

If we’d have gone two up we’d probably have lost 4/5-0

Erm......

shmmeee · Jan 20, 2021

Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Erm......

Two up top...

shmmeee · Jan 20, 2021

Brighton Sky Blue said:
It's that which concerns me most, same happened at PNE.

There isn’t enough forward quality in the squad at the moment and they know it. We all know we aren’t going to score so why wouldn’t they?

Robins - CWR (3 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member

NortonSkyBlue

Well-Known Member

ccfc92

Well-Known Member

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Robins - CWR (3 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency