jordan210
Well-Known Member
Solicitors dont have sign NDA's I believe. We dont have one with our ones at work as legal stuff is slightly different apparently. I have questioned it before
The other parties are probably solicitors from both sides
I think last season there was an option to move mid season, hence the subject to an acceptable deal with BrumGenuine question. Are there any penalties for breaking the St Andrews rent agreement in-season?
If the bridges haven’t been completely burned (Real risk of this), I imagine both parties will continue to talk throughout.
I seem to recall the club said last season we could back out at any time? As you sauy though it's looking possible bridges have been burnt once again.Genuine question. Are there any penalties for breaking the St Andrews rent agreement in-season?
If the bridges haven’t been completely burned (Real risk of this), I imagine both parties will continue to talk throughout.
Genuine question. Are there any penalties for breaking the St Andrews rent agreement in-season?
If the bridges haven’t been completely burned (Real risk of this), I imagine both parties will continue to talk throughout.
Wont' CCFC's deal be with ACL and not Wasps?
This always astonishes me. They go on about nobody should trust SISU yet their club caused issues for QPR and Wycombe and have a history of lies that puts SISU to shame.Wasps fans seem so deluded
View attachment 16082
This is exactly why the local media should have been doing their jobs.
Possible?!?I seem to recall the club said last season we could back out at any time? As you sauy though it's looking possible bridges have been burnt once again.
The Wasps statement seems to have completely missed the point. It’s like they’ve lost themselves in there own agenda.
‘We believe CCFC owner’s call to waive the NDA is nothing more than a tactic to distract fans’
It wasn’t her call at all, she has just agreed to it. How can Wasps have twisted this to have come from Joy?
They are really rattled.
Possible?!?
I was referring to the burned Bridget, which is rather more than possible!I think it's possible, but believe there may be a cost to the club of exiting the St. Andrews contract mid-season (and now it's agreed, this would count as such I believe). Will speak to Dave B at some point to see if it's a realistic prospect or whether we need to move on.
Was Bridget the third party?I was referring to the burned Bridget, which is rather more than possible!
Was Bridget the third party?
It was just utter dribble Drabble. The bit in relation to the NDA from wasps was just embarrassing and poorly worded.The Wasps statement seems to have completely missed the point. It’s like they’ve lost themselves in there own agenda.
‘We believe CCFC owner’s call to waive the NDA is nothing more than a tactic to distract fans’
It wasn’t her call at all, she has just agreed to it. How can Wasps have twisted this to have come from Joy?
They are really rattled.
Im beginning to think that a few people on here have gone beyond simply warming to Joy and increasingly see her as an object of their sexual desire.Love it how quick Joy was to come back to that.
I've warmed to her in the last couple of years, since the sky interview I think.
Get em guys
Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
All Wasps have to do is to produce a separate legal document specifically detailing that they not require SISU to indemnify them.
All Wasps have to do is to produce a separate legal document specifically detailing that they not require SISU to indemnify them.
All SISU have to do is produce one saying they do
And then both claim the other is providing false information and we're still in exactly the same place we were before - two organisations, neither of whom can be trusted to be truthful, doing 'he said, she said'.
The problem I'm having isn't believing that either one of them is lying, it's that one of them might be telling the truth. Both are probably making stuff up or being careful with phrasing that doesn't mean they're outright lying but definitely being misleading.
what the hell does that mean? F&B is basically Wasps. What other suppliers could there be?Council denying they're the third party?
Not in so many words but claiming they didn't insist on anything?
Did Delaware takeover Compass role in IEC or did Wasps dissolve IEC and outsource the whole thing to Delaware?Is it still Delaware that do F&B?
Indemnification could involve the council and this statement still be true. Given councillors have been ordered not to comment it would suggest the words have been carefully chosen and any ambiguity may not be accidental.Do we actually believe the Council?
Biggest liars of the lot.
If they aren't the 3rd names party, they will have certainly twisted Wasps arm around a deal.....
Indemnification could involve the council and this statement still be true. Given councillors have been ordered not to comment it would suggest the words have been carefully chosen and any ambiguity may not be accidental.
I love that Simon can speculate now. I thought he could only report on the facts.
Think your reading too much into the SM ban. More likely people saw the reaction to Matons off top of head thoughts and shut that shit down. Council legal team have often shut down comms around this for safety.
I think it’s clear Wasps request also covers the council, didnt we say as much last year? Then this year it’s “third party” which is weird. Doesn’t mean council asked for it, could be that Wasps just wanted all angles covered that Sisu could use to challenge the sale.
Of course NDA third party and negotiation/indemnity third party may not be the same organisation. Could be council in the indemnity but someone boring like the printer ink supplier in the NDA. Wasps should’ve said they’ll drop it though, or modify it to release just the bits about the indemnity request which can’t have involved anyone else other than the three main players surely?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?