Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
That’s ridiculous. They can’t.change a result when the game has been completed. We will get a one goal head start against Wycombe
That’s ridiculous. They can’t.change a result when the game has been completed. We will get a one goal head start against WycombeYup. If it gets rescinded, McFazdean is free to play against Wycombe, the goal is knocked off, the result is voided and we have to pay them again on Sunday.
Yes but the top of his arm i.e. the shirt sleeve which is NOT handball
Are you sure about that? Unfair on Wycombe. I’m sure I’ve read in the EFL rule book (I know, hard to believe) that the next time we play Luton, at the start of the game it will be 1-0 to us, and they’ll have ten men.That’s ridiculous. They can’t.change a result when the game has been completed. We will get a one goal head start against Wycombe
Was his armpit. You can't run around the pitch with the ball under your armpit.
Was his armpit. You can't run around the pitch with the ball under your armpit.
Because it’s obstruction not because it’s handball. And also because you can’t actually hold the ball under your armpit without your upper arm touching it
Why do we have to pay them?Yup. If it gets rescinded, McFazdean is free to play against Wycombe, the goal is knocked off, the result is voided and we have to pay them again on Sunday.
Depends. I haven’t watched enough to see but if say it hit his shoulder then his hand it’s a pen but not a red. Otherwise yeah.
That’s what I think. Someone else said it hit his knee on the way down.
can you imagine if it was upheld and the ref said he gave it although he didn’t see it
Because it’s obstruction not because it’s handball. And also because you can’t actually hold the ball under your armpit without your upper arm touching it
What a surprise.
Well no because it would be:
A) Obstruction
B) Physically impossible
"For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit. "
Not handball
Well, he finds it much more difficult to run and play football without it.Was also physically impossible to stop that goal without his arm being in the way
Was also physically impossible to stop that goal without his arm being in the way
I think they've seen it as I did
It’s up to our outfield players to prevent centres and crosses & not give cheap free-kicks away.Strange decision and not ideal at all given how Wycombe play. Big blow but the CBs have to step up and prove their worth.
Not especially surprising, don’t think there was enough evidence that it definitely wasn’t handball.
Now you can be wrong together
The video in no way proves that it definitively didn’t hit his arm.apart from the video?
The video in no way proves that it definitively didn’t hit his arm.
No surprise considering the incompetent FA. Im sure if it had been a Man Utd or Arsenal player it would have been overturned
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?