Yup. If it gets rescinded, McFazdean is free to play against Wycombe, the goal is knocked off, the result is voided and we have to pay them again on Sunday.Ok, let me get my head around this........
If the red card is rescinded, then Fadz shouldn’t have been sent off and therefore it shouldn’t have been a penalty and we wouldn’t have gone 2-0 down at that stage of the game and we could have staged a comeback when the score stood at 1-0...........
Or am I missing the point here?
I don’t understand football anymore.
Ok, let me get my head around this........
If the red card is rescinded, then Fadz shouldn’t have been sent off and therefore it shouldn’t have been a penalty and we wouldn’t have gone 2-0 down at that stage of the game and we could have staged a comeback when the score stood at 1-0...........
Or am I missing the point here?
I don’t understand football anymore.
That’s probably why EFL won’t rescind it as it opens up a right can of worms . We just seem to get the rub of the green very often .And if we are subsequently relegated by goal difference, we'll never know if we would have secured a point against Luton and stayed up. This is why VAR was introduced... a £1 billion industry where the benefits are massively skewed to the most successful and yet failure can be realised by a single error by one person in one game.
Don’t seem !!! SorryThat’s probably why EFL won’t rescind it as it opens up a right can of worms . We just seem to get the rub of the green very often .
Yes should hear this morningSo, is it today that we hear? You'd hope so re: preparation for Saturday.
And if we are subsequently relegated by goal difference, we'll never know if we would have secured a point against Luton and stayed up. This is why VAR was introduced... a £1 billion industry where the benefits are massively skewed to the most successful and yet failure can be realised by a single error by one person in one game.
We had one of the first ever ones to be overturned by video evidence after Schmeichel pretended he'd been punched by Micky QuinnI cannot remember us ever having an appeal for a red upheld
happens for other teams all of the time, but I dont think we have ever been successful
The 1st appeal i can remember was one for Dion using his elbow (he did use his elbow, but this was around the time they started to penalise use of the elbow)
Or Notts county at home... that was right in front of me. Still don’t think that was a penaltyWin some you lose some. Were you complaining after Notts County away?
YesSo, is it today that we hear? You'd hope so re: preparation for Saturday.
That’s probably why EFL won’t rescind it as it opens up a right can of worms . We just seem to get the rub of the green very often .
I think it’s that the ref couldn’t have seen the handball as he wasn’t sighted and it looks like he may have got it wrongThe jeopardy rule is confusing now and often players have not been sent off if handballing in the area and I assume that’s the appeal
He moved across and I’m sure it his his hand on the way downIf it hit that area, or very close to it, I can't see how it is deliberate handball.
Ok, let me get my head around this........
If the red card is rescinded, then Fadz shouldn’t have been sent off and therefore it shouldn’t have been a penalty and we wouldn’t have gone 2-0 down at that stage of the game and we could have staged a comeback when the score stood at 1-0...........
Or am I missing the point here?
I don’t understand football anymore.
That’s what I think. Someone else said it hit his knee on the way down.Depends. I haven’t watched enough to see but if say it hit his shoulder then his hand it’s a pen but not a red. Otherwise yeah.
I’ve never got my head around the fact that if you loose the appeal the suspension could go up. What’s the justification, not like the offence has got worse?The club wouldn't be forming a case if they genuinely believe it wasn't a red card.
As if they fail, they run the the risk of McFadzean receiving an increased suspension - but only if the panel believe the appeal has been an abuse of the process.
That was disgraceful. Schmeichel was interviewed afterwards and said ‘he’s a good player, so he doesn’t need to do that’. Actual quote. Then it gets overturned because Quinn didn’t do anything. It’s one thing to take a dive in a game, rotten, but it happens. But to compound it after the match....We had one of the first ever ones to be overturned by video evidence after Schmeichel pretended he'd been punched by Micky Quinn
That was when we lost 1-0, right? Their fans took over the ground that day, it was like spot the city fan.That was disgraceful. Schmeichel was interviewed afterwards and said ‘he’s a good player, so he doesn’t need to do that’. Actual quote. Then it gets overturned because Quinn didn’t do anything. It’s one thing to take a dive in a game, rotten, but it happens. But to compound it after the match....
I’ve never got my head around the fact that if you loose the appeal the suspension could go up. What’s the justification, not like the offence has got worse?
I’ve never got my head around the fact that if you loose the appeal the suspension could go up. What’s the justification, not like the offence has got worse?
Frivolous appeal. i.e. so blatantly deserved that you're wasting everyone's time in re-investigating etc. Would never be the case in this scenario & I'm not sure anyone has been punished for frivolous appeal in years anyway.
am I correct in saying the handball rule was clarified so that the first contact is what counts, i.e. if it hits a hand after the initial contact it is not deemed a penalty?He moved across and I’m sure it his his hand on the way down
From the top of my head, I remember Man U appealing against a red card for Ferdinand (definitely Man U, but not 100% sure it was Ferdinand). Blatantly obvious red card. they stupidly put in an appeal and the ban was extended a game. Would be about 10 years ago now. There's got to be more than this though.......I vaguely remember someone having an additional one game ban added a few years back (but probably imagining it - age thing!) Off to Google!!
From the top of my head, I remember Man U appealing against a red card for Ferdinand (definitely Man U, but not 100% sure it was Ferdinand). Blatantly obvious red card. they stupidly put in an appeal and the ban was extended a game. Would be about 10 years ago now. There's got to be more than this though.......
From the top of my head, I remember Man U appealing against a red card for Ferdinand (definitely Man U, but not 100% sure it was Ferdinand). Blatantly obvious red card. they stupidly put in an appeal and the ban was extended a game. Would be about 10 years ago now. There's got to be more than this though.......
Taking my rose tinted glasses off Fadz did use his arm to me himself bigger, the ball struck the side of his chest and onto the underside of his arm. The ball would have gone in without his arm. Still harsh.
I’ve never got my head around the fact that if you loose the appeal the suspension could go up. What’s the justification, not like the offence has got worse?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?