Grendel
Well-Known Member
Many were to blame not least the support shown by most supporters to the manager who clearly was never ever up to the job.
My lowest point was getting relegated to Div3. As you well know SISU admitted it was their fault.
My lowest point was getting relegated to Div3. As you well know SISU admitted it was their fault.
At that time we still had a stadium to go to and didn't know about SISU and how much we were going to get shafted
Yes, I don't have a problem with them owning and running CCFC. If they get the Arena at a low rent, improve the squad and eventually buy half or all of the stadium then it would ultimately make us more attractive to another buyer who could maybe take us to the next level.
Couldn't agree more. Regardless of who owns the club, owning the stadium makes us a more viable proposition. Be that Sisu staying or someone else taking over.
The pure anti Sisu is clouding people minds about the bigger picture, which to be blunt, is the safety and progression of Coventry City.
So, were we as equally short sighted into getting him in the first place? And Bailey? And Adams? And Robins?
MR has said we'll fight to keep McG.
Ah, the old house analogy. No, you'd be thrown out. However, this isn't an individual and a house it's a 130 year old football club fighting for it's survival.
I'm a simple man, me. SISU own CCFC and I support CCFC. ACL do not own or run CCFC so I do not support ACL. I want the best possible deal the football club can get so if they have to play hard ball to get it, then so be it.
That will be Hollands pies.....and yes, they are the best. Can't buy them here in Scunny either.Stevenage were in conference a few years ago and the ground is still at that level. £23 to get in was over the top but the last 15 mins of the game made it worth it, free parking aswell.
Oldham is the worst I have been to this season but they make up for it with the best pies in the league, so far.
But that is why I get so annoyed by some of your posts. I support CCFC just like you but the people you constantly defend have played a massive roll (not all) in trying to destroy OUR club. They are putting OUR club at risk by trying to play their hardball games with ACL who just want them to pay what they agreed when they took over the club. Yes re-negotiate the rent, but pay what we owe with that condition added on.
shut up fool
And that is debate is it. Tosser ( c I can be an immature twat too)
The original rent arrangement was always going to prevent this club moving forward.
Out of interest did you think the same of Elliot and co when they couldn't be bothered to pay fees owed to other clubs as well as the inland revenue?
Yes I did because they represent CCFC and just like our current owners gave us a bad rep because of the way they run our club.
Just like last season apart from the a different manager saying it (don't mention the T word)
How odd. Your previous post puts all the blame at sisu yet now you say the last regime was no better.
So the current owners are not all to blame then?
Can't wait till they issue a winding up order and I hope the club goes into administration also, good on you ACL for standing up to the club. 3 cheers for ACL I say
Got the party food, hats and music ready to go
Can't wait till they issue a winding up order and I hope the club goes into administration also, good on you ACL for standing up to the club. 3 cheers for ACL I say
Got the party food, hats and music ready to go
Please read ALL my posts on this thread.
If you want to slag someone off at least do your homework, or like your backers is it easier to twist things to fit around what you want it to read.Do I have to?
The opening one was pretty dumb.
Can't wait till they issue a winding up order and I hope the club goes into administration also, good on you ACL for standing up to the club. 3 cheers for ACL I say
Got the party food, hats and music ready to go
Yes...but you're not a very good supporter though are you.Well we all know the club won't get wound up - but by issuing a winding up order we know that SISU will have to sit up and take note... if they do I will say "well done ACL" for not allowing SISU to walk all over them.
Oh wait, sorry, all that matters in the world is CCFC so naturally all other parties should roll over and are obliged to give us services for free. Stupid of me to forget that.
If you want to slag someone off at least do your homework, or like your backers is it easier to twist things to fit around what you want it to read.
Make no mistake Macca......we are doing well in spite of Sisu NOT because of them. MR was not their first choice (which is well documented). What evidence is there that they have changed and now have the club's interest at heart?Well I m going to get back to footballing matters and put my faith in those in the know who believe Sisu have changed and have the clubs interests at heart. It's easy to forget in all this that we are doing pretty well
Make no mistake Macca......we are doing well in spite of Sisu NOT because of them. MR was not their first choice (which is well documented). What evidence is there that they have changed and now have the club's interest at heart?
Yes...but you're not a very good supporter though are you.
I wouldn't say we are obliged to get services for free, but if they offered it for free I certainly wouldn't turn it down. You would probably turn it down though, in fact you are so generous and charitable you would probably offer to pay 10 times the asking price
Where is it "well documented" robins was not first choice?
Keys on a radio show, I mean its not as if he would have any other agenda to say that is it?Where is it "well documented" robins was not first choice?
Not a very good supporter - because I don't support the club in its hard-headed attempts to trample over everyone else? If that's your criteria of being a supporter, probably not.
If you were a German citizen in the 1930s, would you support Hitler? Yes his tactics were a bit dubious, but creating a master race and bringing the Sudetenland back into the Reich made it all worth it, right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?